On utility section of ipswitch's site; there is a e-mail tracking lite that indicated
as free.
On answer track site, I didn't find this program free; It is possible only purchase it.
Maybe I didn't find the correttly link?
There is anyone that have this application?
Thanks.
Pasquale.
Thanks all. I've run Imail on either NT or 2000 Workstation for nearly
seven years. Never understood that a server OS had any real performance
advantage. Will rethink that now.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent:
On utility section of ipswitch's site; there is a e-mail tracking lite
that indicated as free.
On answer track site, I didn't find this program free; It is possible only
purchase it.
Maybe I didn't find the correttly link?
There is anyone that have this application?
The Ipswitch site is
Unless we read the specs wrong for the Imail antivirus, in that case my
bad...
snip
IMail Anti-Virus Premium Edition
* Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server
* The IMail Anti-Virus server and LiveUpdate require Internet Explorer
4.71.1712.6 or later be installed
* Pentium III 500
RE: If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I
HIGHLY recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why
your performance might be degrading.
I found the opposite to be true - I used to run IMail on Win2K Server and switched to
If you are running it through the GUI don't, there is a bug I submitted to
ipswitch support. You have to run it through the command line to have it
perform as intended.
Cale
-Original Message-
From: Oblio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 11:39 PM
To: [EMAIL
I have been reading several lists where people are
having a problem with the SMTP server service stopping in version 8.05. Has
anyone found out the cause and/or a fix?
Please share.
---Marcel
I have been reading several lists where people are having a problem with
the SMTP server service stopping in version 8.05. Has anyone found out the
cause and/or a fix?
The only known cause I can recall is that IMail v8's anti-spam would cause
the SMTP service to stop occasionally if certain
Thanks for the quick reply. Below is a link to one
of the messages I was referring to:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?ForumID=10MessageID=1290
I am experiencing a similar problem and can trace
it back to around 9/10/04. I haveno BLs listed .
---Marcel
The statement I was replying to was that Windows workstation was required
for the AV product and that was my bad I reversed workstation and server
when I read it. But you could have stayed with workstation by using declude
virus if being on workstation was that important and probably saved some
I've seen references on this list to the Monitor
service causing problems with the Queue Manager. Don't know if that could
affect the SMTP service as well, but it might be worth stopping the Monitor
service for a couple of days asa test.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Marcel
Even with the premium AV product (which requires a server platform to run
on) you can point the AV processing to a machine running it and off load
this processing..Just keep in mind network latency
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have a client who's email failed to get sent because they had a bad
address in their 'cc' field. Their question is, why didn't the message get
sent to the good address? Is there a way to make sure that it does?
Example:
Mail From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rcpt To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rcpt
I have found that this usually happens when the bad address is an address on
your server. Imail seems to check for accurate internal addresses first.
If the address is rejected, then it will not send the e-mail out at all.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Aaah. So, if the example had been a bad email that wasn't local, like
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it would have accepted the message, delivered the
first half and failed on the second half?
That makes sense.
Thanks,
Oblio
At 10/20/2004 03:54 PM, you wrote:
I have found that this usually happens when
This isn't really an issue with your mail server, but rather your mail client. A mail
server should respond with an error if the
recip address isn't allowed or doesn't exist. The rest of the session can continue if
the mail client so chooses, but your client
appears to stop at the first error
As Christian said. This is a know failing with Microsoft clients. They do
not handle this error well... I believe Mozilla based client and some others
(Eudora Pro, Pine, Thunderbird, etc) can handle this
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Christian Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Noted. I only know the Microsoft because it is what we use in our office.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom
[Ipswitch]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 'cc'
- Original Message -
From: Christian Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 13:07
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 'cc' behavior
This isn't really an issue with your mail server, but rather your mail
client. A mail server should respond with an
If you have a gateway and your cusomers on on your own IP address you can
have them use the gateway which will accept the mail and deliver it.
Effectivly bypassing the outlook/express issue.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 19:49:52, A. Clausen wrote:
This annoying behavior is found in Outlook Express and Outlook. I get
frequent calls from customers who can't send email because an errant
message keeps popping up as unsendable. It's quite annoying, and it's
amazing that MS has never
This annoying behavior is found in Outlook Express and Outlook. I
get frequent calls from customers who can't send email because an
errant message keeps popping up as unsendable. It's quite annoying,
and it's amazing that MS has never seen fit to fix it.
To be fair, however, you're
22 matches
Mail list logo
