We've got 3GB's in our mail server running 2003 32 bit version and it hardly
uses even 1 GB of ram so our needs weren't as great as yours apparently. We
also chose not to renew and watched release after release come out with more
and more bugs. Like anyone else running a mail server it just can't
I've been waiting for version 11 out of beta so I can trust 10. Ipswitch has
been awful at releasing software before it's actually ready. Sorry but
that's the way ipswitch has been doing things over the past several years.
Bill
From: imail_forum-ow...@list.ipswitch.com
We recommend everyone leave messages for 10 days on all devices so
everything goes everywhere. IMAP is nice but when your users are sucking up
2+ GB's of space each you run out of storage pretty quickly.
Bill
found the needle and it was a corrupt mailbox of some sort. Apparently, the
customer checks it from 4 computers and a mobile phone. Not sure how we keep
this kind of thing happening in the future. PITA to resolve.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil
To: Bill Foresman
anybody???
- Original Message -
From: Bill Foresman
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 6:51 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] pop3d consuming cpu
Recently we're having to restart pop3 almost daily and it's continuously
using 50% of the cpu
thanks, Pete, I'll check into it.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil
To: Bill Foresman
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:00 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] pop3d consuming cpu
I have seen this happen before when there were one or more corrupted
mailboxes.
I
Recently we're having to restart pop3 almost daily and it's continuously using
50% of the cpu. Nothing really looks out of the ordinary but obviously
something is wrong. Any ideas?
that's a problem, bummer.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wolf
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 9:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] declude / dnsstuff.com / R. Scott Perry apparent
lawsuit...
I've been on this list for many years. I no longer
We only offer 100 MB mailboxes because mail is consuming more and more
bandwidth. People think nothing of emailing files like you describe these
days. We tell people that files of that size are best sent using a file
service not email.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:34 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Message Size problems
We only offer 100 MB mailboxes because mail is consuming more and more
bandwidth. People think nothing of emailing files like you describe these
days. We tell
Does anyone know that it's possible to send mail from any domain on an imail
server using the root account? Btw, the password is actually 'password'!
To Unsubscribe: http://imailserver.com/support/discussion_list/
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
How was this resolved?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 3:14 PM
To: Bill Foresman
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] sending mail using root user
Does anyone know that it's possible to send mail
They can do that but the bottom line is that if they make it too much of a
PITA we won't care and simply inform our customers to use another free email
service.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: Friday, August 08,
This is the main problem I have had with imail. The never ending upgrades
which cause further problems. Weve learned that its best to stay on
whatever version happens to work and not bother upgrading or paying for the
SA. What a waste of money that was since you have to pay for software that
wallet should be
EXPLODING WITH CASH.
Update still no phone call from Tripp or Kevin.
Travis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:44 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] New Bugs in 10.01
] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:22 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] New Bugs in 10.01
I was too but its obvious that a lot customers have left for safer waters.
Were a family owned hosting company and cannot afford the problems
Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this?
sys0617.txt 67411 06:17 02:10 SMTPD(556901077e5f) [69.8.234.8]
connect 213.69.135.200 port 4156
sys0617.txt 67414 06:17 02:10 SMTPD(556901077e5f) [213.69.135.200]
EHLO mxserver.hoefliger.de
sys0617.txt 67417 06:17 02:10
We use MxGuard, SortMonster and URI which works like a charm.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deborah Chard
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:38 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Premium spam and antivirus filters
I would like some
The best thing to do is talk to your customer instead of turning them off.
Their staff will freak and assuredly move the account. Communication, my friend.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 6:52 PM
To:
What would we need to do to simply block mail from Russia altogether? For us
they’re the #1 spammer on the planet.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª Valades
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:11 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] RULES
: Установка АТС - Низкие цены!
According to our spam research the #1 spammer in the world is Russian.
Brad Senter
Product Marketing Manager
Ipswitch - Messaging Division
706-312-3562
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Friday, April 25
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:56 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] RE: [IMail Forum] RE: [IMail Forum] RE: [IMail Forum]
RULES for Character Russians ej: Asunto: Установка АТС - Низкие цены!
Ok, so how do we block them altogether
No offense but I don't know where you get that from. IIS is simple to
configure and is largely ready to go out of the box. As far as resources go,
if you think that IIS is tough you may want to take a serious look at your
hardware if you're considering moving to 2006.
Sincerely,
Bill
() at
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint,
Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
Don't want to delete their files so any ideas? Everyone else's web interface
works fine.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
I deleted the main.xml and it came up fine after that.s
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lewis
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:17 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject
Copy all.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:26 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Content
I see what you're trying to do now. Ok, you would have to grab anything with
an attachment and forward it to another account for you review.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
but
their concern is that not being realtime in terms of message notification.
Would store and forward be more realtime?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com
What is the spam conference to attend in the US? Filtering isn't working
and I'm curious where all this might be headed. We're harvesting IP's from
our logs and creating an ACC file to simply block them. Working pretty well
but not an exact science like anything else.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
enlightening but surely there's someone thinking of a solution as spam grows
to 95%+.
What happens when it's 99.999%???
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent
of domains or your mail server gets 100K emails per day. Let's not
also forget the subscription fee.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Friday
you're not actually receiving. It's
pretty neat to see just what email is coming through your server.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Friday
Yes, but it still costs a small fortune to accept the spam in the first
place.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:02
We could generate an acc file using that database which would work.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 2:24 PM
To: Len
In order to replace the acc file you need to restart smtpd32. The file is
read on startup so you can replace it and restart the services.
We're blocking over 40,000 IP's at this point and only ipswitch would know
the answer as to how many could be blocked.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity
Pretty sad when you have to use software from the same company to verify
that your other software is actually working.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday
Amen, brother J
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:37 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Monitor
imail
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: "John T (lists)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent 11/23/2007 8:23:06 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server
Bill, I
user" lines are likely to be future spamming IP's
the same IP's keep showing up so blocking one IP removes it from bothering you again
spammers like emails beginning with the letter "J" as the from address (I know, weird)
patterns do emerge
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matro
connections from over 30,000 IP's that are absolutely spammers! We're going to release the software opensource as soon as possible.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: "Len Conrad" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent 11/23/2007 7:36:36 PM
To: I
We're seeing this a lot in the past few days as well. I had to restart IIS
twice yesterday. I'm wondering if this is some spyware script in spam doing
this.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
What's the actual value one should enter into the max message size since KB
is obviously wrong.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
Those are priced per user so looks a bit expensive for us.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:21 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
I doubt Smartermail would have any less performance than Imail with listserv
or regular email. The key to either of those is likely processor and memory
more than application differences.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From
. No reason ipswitch can't make this better. It seems to me that
they're stringing people along so we renew our SA's rather than completing
the software. Each iteration, I won't refer to them as Versions since that
would imply completed software, seems to introduce new problems.
Regards,
Bill
Yeah but it sucks since the email has to be uploaded to the server and then
it gives them an error. Kind of defeats the purpose of saving the bandwidth.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Fuhrmeister
Sent: Wednesday, September
It would have been nice to have had this built into the web app, oh well. If
you move the entire application over theres no reason to upgrade or be
strung along.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 8:11 AM
To:
=1' style='border:0px solid gray;'
WIDTH=0 HEIGHT=0 FRAMEBORDER=0 MARGINWIDTH=0 MARGINHEIGHT=0 SCROLLING=no
Windows Live OneCare kicked in immediately on page load so make sure your
virus software is ready for psyme.gen before playing.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
Anyone?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:11 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] copy all
We're currently using the copy all option for a client but now need to add
another client
As a hosting company we provide IP's upon request so you don't actually HAVE
to have one unless you're using an SSL cert. Yeah, simply add an A record
and point it to the shared IP provided.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL
We've got a client with several thousand mailboxes and have a need to remove
a single message from all mailboxes. Is there a precise way of doing this or
do we have to delete all emails from the day it was received?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
I added a new domain yesterday and users cannot send mail using web
messaging. They get the following error:
An error occurred while attempting to send the message: failed
authentication
?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
Is that necessary now?
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:48 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] new error
Ok, guess I never ran into this before.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:11 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail
Check your redirect settings in IIS and make sure it's not set to send users
to default.aspx which should actually be no redirect or login.aspx
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
The default.aspx should be no redirect or login.aspx
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Jelinek
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:54 AM
To: Imail_Forum
We can't reproduce this in the office but we're hearing from several
customers about this:
Unable to log in to the system. Reason: the return URL specified for
request redirection is invalid.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
What should be in IIS if we want to remove that altogether?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:19 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Here you are:
http://preview.ipswitch.com/preview/messaging/imail-2006.21-RC1.exe
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:55 AM
The resolution for us on the logout issue was a setting for the 404 page
which was set to login.aspx at some point. It should be set to default.aspx
instead. All seems to be well in the world now.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message
Anyone seen this before?
If you encounter this error again, please provide the following information
to your network administrator to assist in trouble-shooting.
Message:
Could not load type 'Ipswitch.Web.Common.IUser' from assembly
'Ipswitch.Web.Common, Version=1.0.2700.16448,
Doh!
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:37 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Grey Listing
additional error
codes..
Any idea how to correct this?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
attachment: winmail.dat
Thanks Daniel but since this only exists on our imail server I don't believe
it to be an IIS issue. I'm hoping ipswitch will chime in and tell me why
this is happening or if its fixed in 2006.2x
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL
straight forward but I must be missing something. Are there
other things that need to be done for this to work?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
This still isn’t working as email is bouncing. I’ve added our server as
secondary MX and added them to the host file. They’re not sending email through
our server so I don’t think I need to relay anything for them?
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656
That last part was a question and if I’m wrong then I’m sure someone would
point that out.
The bounces are when someone sends email to that domain. I think Dan may be
correct about the old DNS at this point.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
How about downloading openoffice instead of playing this game?
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:16 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
While I'm on hold I figured I'd send this out. A client needs to put a
disclaimer at the bottom of every email sent from their domain using web
messaging. In lieu of having every person fill out a footer disclaimer is
there a way to have a custom footer for a single domain?
Thanks,
Bill
I believe there is now a GUI in beta if you search back a few weeks.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:37 PM
To: Imail_Forum
Your server should be able to handle that just fine IMHO. Of course, this
would depend on what virus scanners youre using, spam filtering, etc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:25 AM
To:
Not 2006, it's web admin only until now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:14 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Prototype of IMail console administration utility
is
What if you're web server is hosed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:31 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Prototype of IMail console administration utility
is ready
First question I have is what's the security layer?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:38 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Prototype of IMail console
.
Tripp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:50 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Prototype of IMail console administration utility
is ready for preview
First question I
Try creating the folder for them and deleting once more. It could be the web
admin isn't smart enough to know to delete the user even though the folder
doesn't exist.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:56 AM
To:
Can you guys put a limit on file size sent through this? Getting a 2 MB file
on a list is uncool.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Naren
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:18 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Webclieny error
Hi friens,
What's the deal with ntf files in the spool dir? First time I've ever seen
this before.
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19981110-DD08.htm
says: The *.ntf files in the spool directory are server side
delivery receipts.
Daniel Donnelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
Foresman
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 3:03 PM
To: Imail_Forum
ECTED]>To: <imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue There must be something that .2 changes that isn't reversed by downgrading. Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 -Original Mes
If you're running 2006 which is written in straight asp then you might benefit from Port80's software called ZipEnable (IIS 6) or HttpZip (IIS5). It turns on IIS' built-in compression which will greatly reduce the bandwidth used.Regards,Bill-Original Message-From: "Miguel Benavente" [EMAIL
Not so sure about that since I have CNN refreshing on my browser all the time and it doesn't do that.-Original Message-From: "Bruce Barnes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 9/12/2006 2:56:58 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 - Auto Refresh Steals focus from Compose
someone asked about this a little while ago. Last updated 12/14/2004
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20030513-DM01.htm
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
there are many trade-offs in life, you can buy harder tires and get
better mileage but they won't hold the road as well.
I'll look into ClamD, thanks.
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Those hits need to be qualified as to exactly what they are.
I'm really comparing system overhead here. Clam takes a big
assuming that you're sending to 10,000 different addresses, each
newsletter would be scanned once.
Len Conrad wrote:
Send out a 10K user newsletter and this becomes a problem.
A 10K subscriber newsletter body is scanned once or 10K times?
Len
We're testing fprot with MxGuard since it appears to be a lot less
overhead on our server. My concern is that it doesn't seem to catch as
many viruses as Clam. Can anyone confirm this?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
clam just seems to take up a lot of processor where fprot hardly touches
it. send a mailing list through the server and clam crushes it. That's
the problem.
David Gregg wrote:
We're testing fprot with MxGuard since it appears to be a lot less
overhead on our server. My concern is that it
let me clarify, we're using clamscan to scan email not the server.
Nick Hayer wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 at 6:55, David Gregg wrote:
I have had ClamAV crash on a regular basis ~ once per month. I am not
sure if its the wrapper I use or clamav itself. so I now do not use
ClamAV. Also -
my dilemma is that Clam seems to catch more viruses but takes a LOT
more CPU to run than Fprot.
Nick Hayer wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 at 7:38, David Gregg wrote:
Hi David,
The problem was not Clam after all (and clam was never crashing, IMail
SMTPD was). We quickly returned to Clam
don't think MxGuard does that?
Len Conrad wrote:
my dilemma is that Clam seems to catch more viruses but takes a LOT
more CPU to run than Fprot.
If you have any control over the order of processing, all AV checks,
because they are expensive, should be run after all other
restrictions, so that
we're calling clamscan.exe not clamd
Nick Hayer wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 at 11:12, Bill Foresman wrote:
my dilemma is that Clam seems to catch more viruses
This is probably a question that Declude Scott can answer but my
first thought is ClamAV may be making false
that sounds good but I would also like to see it NOT scan outbound
messages for viruses.
David Gregg wrote:
don't think MxGuard does that?
Nope. All messages entering the server are scanned for vuruses, then spa,.
The reason is that just because something is marked as
I'm really comparing system overhead here. Clam takes a big chunk out
of the processor when it runs while f-prot barely even registers. Send
out a 10K user newsletter and this becomes a problem.
Darin Cox wrote:
Uh...apples and oranges... F-prot is not an anti-phishing product.
Evidently
would it be best to simply add domains that you want to blacklist to the
phrase list since spammers are sending more text only email now?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge
would it be best to simply add blacklist domains to the phrase list
since spammers are sending more text only email now?
R. Scott Perry wrote:
About every 2-4 days one of our customers, without fail will
call
into our NOC and ask us are you having problems with the mail
server, it's
In MS DNS we appear to have a pointer record for our web servers but
when I do a lookup on them it says that we don't. Obviously we're
missing something here and would appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Bill
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
---
- Original Message - From: Bill Foresman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:18 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] PTR record for web servers
In MS DNS we appear to have a pointer record for our web servers but
when I do a lookup on them it says that we don't
/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.104.149.39
Substitute your IP in that URL.
Have a good one,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] PTR record
Title: Re: [IMail Forum] PTR record for web
servers
Seems odd that we didn't have to do anything for the mail server and we
have it. We do get our bandwidth from Qwest and ESi owns the building
we're in.
Greg Kesler wrote:
In MS DNS we appear to have a pointer
record for our web
We've just started using KWM and have an odd problem. We've put them on
just a few domains for testing purposes. One of the domains has been
allotted 25 accounts but only shows being allotted 10 for some reason.
When I log in under the classic templates the correct numbers are shown.
??
To
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
