Anyone?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 2:00 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] max rcpt exceeded
It seems
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:02 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] max rcpt exceeded
Anyone?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
It seems that Imail will deny access to anyone exceeding that max rcpt
setting in smtp. Anyway to NOT have it block someone and just deny the
email?
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
I searched the kb so I apologize if I missed this but I need to change a
domain name from a .org to a .com for a virtual domain.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
.
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Tech Support mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:36 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] change virtual domain name
I searched the kb so I apologize if I missed this but I need to change
Interesting. Keep us posted on how things when you put a load on Imail for a
better comparison.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Toussaint
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Read the last 4 words in that message and I think you can call them back.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:54 AM
To:
enough since we will be
planning the upgrade soon after 2006.2 is released.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:57 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail vulnerability, or do we have
.
marc
At 18:03 29.01.2007, you wrote:
Oh how silly of me.Let me call them and say: excuse me, uhhm. I choose
not to upgrade, therefore there is no alternative.
I try that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent
in with my opinions about both.
They are both decent products in their own regard, but they both have warts.
Matt
Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
My faith in installing ipswitch upgrades has been demolished. Good luck with
that. They'll help you but it shouldn't be as bad as it's been for us. Brand
new
No big deal. :)
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 12:05 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail rule to
I’m buying a license to Smartermail 4.0 very soon. $899 for an enterprise
license and it already does way more than Imail. Their version 4 is comparable
to Imail version 10 which we won’t see for 2 more years. I’ll keep the imail
server up as long as I have customers that require the odbc
: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 8.22 to 2006 Upgrade
I heard the enterprise version comes with Spam Assasin - is that ture?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:27 PM
To: Imail_Forum
We'll be moving away from godaddy due to their solicitation of customers.
Probably use tucows as a registrant since they don't host websites.
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, January
Oh, thanks for that. Not interested in funding my own competition since we
have enough as it is.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:04 AM
To:
kind of problems you ran into.
Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
We'll be moving away from godaddy due to their solicitation of customers.
Probably use tucows as a registrant since they don't host websites.
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I'm hoping we can set a global value in a future release of imail rather
than having to go through these steps to setup a new domain. Also, the
addition of abuse would be nice as well.
Thanks,
Bill Foresman
MatrosityHosting.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: IMail AV
$3995! Are they stoned? There are at least 3 other mail servers for
less than $1000 that already have more functionality and look like they
should cost $3995!
Why would anyone buy this at that price?
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
It seems imail may be going back to have a
Title: IMail AV
I would stay with that, we're extremely pleased.
L. Bhandari wrote:
I couldn't find anywhere to just subscribe to
the anti virus - they just keep sending me emails to get the IMail
Secure server (which sounds like an ICS alternative) for $595 which
includes the
I wouldn't do that as our experience showed us that people won't check
the spam folder. You then have to run a weekly delete script or risk the
mailbox filling up due to the spam folder. We modify the headers and let
the clients filter on their end. This way we're out of the loop and
I can understand some of your statements but it's the way things are.
I'm not real pleased with the cost of imail and it's lack of what would
be considered standard features in other offerings. The bottom line is
that it's a lot more to switch to something else than it is to prod
ipswitch into
I definitely agree that features should work no matter how old the
software is and any vendor should be held to the fire to make them work
as advertised.
Joe Wolf / Internet Specialists, LLC wrote:
Bruce,
I won't beat this dead horse any longer. We just a have a difference
of opinion.
I
It's not but it should be. If you bought a car with 6 gears and it
doesn't shift into the 6th gear then the manufacturer has to fix it.
Software should be no different. I pay my subscription fees to ipswitch
to ensure that we keep pace with the demands of our clients. The only
way to do that
My model would require the software vendor to guarantee that what they
code actually works as sold. Some of the problems people are having
have been reported multiple times and I don't believe anyone should
have to buy an upgrade to get a fix for something that never worked
correctly when they
urchin but definitely NOT webtrends. We own what used to be an
enterprise license but they changed the name of the software and now
charge for pageviews if you can believe it. They changed the name to
screw their customers out of valid upgrades. Since we owned an
enterprise license which meant
smartertools is a company that I would definitely do business with.
Pricing is reasonable and the software looks better than its more
expensive competitors. Ipswitch ha ssome time before we move on but they
had better hurry it up.
Dan Horne wrote:
Yeah, Webtrends can get expensive. We have
I don't know how we ended up on the BLARS list but I'm sure as hell not
paying him to find out. Why does Declude list this guy on DNSStuff if
he's just some guy with a list. From looking at his site it seems he's
just extorting people for $250 per hour.
Bill
To Unsubscribe:
I agree so why even list him to give him any credibility?
Rod Dorman wrote:
On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 10:00:30, Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
I don't know how we ended up on the BLARS list but I'm sure as hell not
paying him to find out. Why does Declude list this guy
That's much more like it!
Tripp Allen wrote:
I've posted some screen shots on the web forums. The link is:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?ForumID=10MessageID=1018
5
Tripp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Rogers
we disable their accounts. this is a pain if they have a lot of them
but mail is still delivered. you'd be amazed how quickly you get paid
when they can't get their email.
Martin Schaible wrote:
Hi Jason,
We usually disable the virtual server on IIS or Apache and delete the mx-record.
What are you guys charging (if anything) to customers for a copyall
service? It appears you can really only do this for one domain as well.
Bill
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 8:36 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] copyall fee?
What are you guys charging (if anything
Of Matrosity
Tech
Support
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 8:36 AM
To:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] copyall fee?
What are you guys charging (if anything) to customers for a copyall
service? It appears you can really only do this for one domain as well.
Bill
To Unsubscribe:
http
it and is just another feather
in our cap. We do not like to nickel and dime our customers.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity
Tech Support
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 3:28 PM
To: IMail_Forum
what is done for any other mail account.
A little parinoid are we!
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matrosity
Tech Support
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:36 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
One of our client is now required to copy and keep all inbound and
outbound email. Is there a way to do this using imail?
Thanks,
Bill
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge
Killer templates are VERY buggy in my experience but you can disable
the ad banners.
IMail has needed a serious overhaul of web templates for several years!
Pascal Brenner wrote:
I posted a entry on the forum, but in case this is
a different audience.
Is there any way to get
we've been asking about that for almost 2 years now that I know of so I
would say there is no plans to improve webmail on the horizon.
Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango wrote:
Any answer from Ipswitch? Should I take this silence as there is no time
table or new developments on the
Does Imail no longer support the max outbound msg size limit for virtual
domains? I had thought this feature worked with virtual domains in the
past and now I'm being told that it doesn't support that for virtual
domains.
Bill
To Unsubscribe:
Yes, my understanding was you set it on the primary domain and that set
it for all virtuals.
Bill
Matt wrote:
I thought that it used your primary domain's settins for this, but
that it couldn't be set on a per-virtual domain basis.
Matt
Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
Does Imail
Our smptpd32 process runs up to about 400 MB's of ram. I've spoken to
ipswitch about this on numerous occasions and was previously told this
was not normal until upgrading to 8.21. Now, they tell me that it is
normal. It's not like we don't have the memory but it seems odd for a
process to use
just closes but no time period.
Will wrote:
Am I correct in assuming it will simply close the smtp connection, which
will bounce and allow them to correct and try again? Or should I fear
that it will lock out their connection for a time?
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I've faxed 25 solid black pages to the paying client with a note at the
end defining spam and how I would appreciate them stopping. Makes me
feel better, decimates the fax ink ($$) but probably does nothing.
Bill
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Sorry, guy, but murder is and always will
that sounds like more of a platform change than a change away from
ipswitch. Unless I was a unix guru, I wouldn't want to move in that
direction. We also renewed our maintenance although we had every
intention of moving to smartermail. Probably will if ipswitch doesn't
reinvest our maintenance
so dump they're AV and use MxGuard or Declude.
Barr, Barry A wrote:
But they're no longer letting you resubscribe to AV updates ala carte
-Original Message-
From: Imail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 11:35 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Darin,
You're insane to even think about trying this on your production box.
Load it onto your workstation or some other machine.
Bill
Darin Cox wrote:
How about back it up, do a search and replace on the reg file, then restore?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Hruska
ok, sorry.
Dan Horne wrote:
Wrong thread, Bill. You're thinking the "Trying out Collaboration
Suite" thread.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Matrosity Tech Support
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 200
they're probably blocking smtp access to other servers.
Rick Hogue wrote:
Anyone else heard of something that is going on with Netscape that would
allow a user to send to their Netscape email address but when sending
through Netscape or through Outlook using our SMTP servers that the emails
been very happy with mxguard so you might consider starting with that
before diving into Declude.
Chris Mechsner wrote:
Were
looking into 'out sourcing' the SPAM filtering from Imails Admin
interface - to Declude. I know a lot of you guys/gals use Declude -
would you use them again
we just use spamcop and spamhaus and delete after one match. no sense in
checking all of those for every message. If you're listed on those two
then you're a spammer in our book.
Mike Biddle wrote:
Does anyone else here have any major problems with deleting messages
after 2 matches with
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
spamcop and spamhaus
Kalpesh Kamdar wrote:
Hello All,
Off-late we have been receiving a lot
of SPAMs. At present, the spam settings are to tag the subject line and
deliver to the user.
Can anyone suggest "Trusted DNS
we don't bounce anything anymore for this very reason. I have taken to
trusting spamcop and spamhaus for instant deletion though. As I
mentioned earlier, if you're on those lists then you better get it
fixed.
Dan Barker wrote:
That's a great way to get YOU blacklisted, you spammer!
If
get your host to deal with this or move. You should be worried about
being blacklisted as well.
Jeffrey C Owen wrote:
Has anyone on the list
had any experience in getting GoDaddy
to white list a mail server?
GoDaddy has had a spam
report from an IP address within the
same
I'm having a disagreement with a person at advancedhiring.com
because they're blacklisted by spamhaus. How would I find out if these
guys are or are not actually spammers?
Thanks,
Bill
Yes, the guy spouted off that Media3 was one of the largest ISP's there
are and that Spamhaus was "flawed". I also had to listen to how many
fortune 500 clients they had that didn't have a problem with them being
on spamhaus.
Duane Hill wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 at 12:41:52 PM,
they're sending it from a web server using cdonts.
Duane Hill wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 at 12:41:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I'm having a disagreement with a person at advancedhiring.com
because they're blacklisted by spamhaus. How would I find out if
these
kicking it out. When they argue that I tell them to get
lost and fix their problem.
Barry Bahrami
Commercial Network Services
www.CommercialNetworkServices.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matrosity
Tech Support
Sent
I'm still dealing with this open connection problem. I've listed the
offending IP in the control list but it seems they can still maintain
open connections?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
What do you have your tcptimedwaitdelay set at?
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
time_wait
You should be setting the TcpTimedWaitDelay to a lower value than the
default of 4 minutes. See my previous posts on the topic, such as:
We're showing an IP in our open connections using netstat that we have
denied access by adding them to the control access list. The problem is
that they are still opening connections. I thought this would prevent
them from even keeping a connection open but I guess not. Any idea how
to prevent
to?
Eric S
- Original Message - From: Matrosity Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:49 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] open connections
We're showing an IP in our open connections using netstat that we
have denied access by adding
- Original Message - From: Matrosity Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:49 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] open connections
We're showing an IP in our open connections using netstat that we
have denied access by adding them to the control
ranges between 45000 and 47000
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
on what port?Eric S
- Original Message - From: Matrosity Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] open connections
bounced the service
it will say "Max Invalid RCPTs exceeded"...
ajay wrote:
Hi,
I have modified the
registry to close the session once a
email contains 3 invalid addrs. I want to find out if the feature is
working
correctly. How do I see that in the log file..I mean what will it write
in the
yes
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
and on the what about the other end of the connection are these all
on 25?
Eric S
- Original Message - From: Matrosity Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] open
time_wait
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
and the state of these connections? Time_Wait, Close_Wait, etc?
Eric S
- Original Message - From: Matrosity Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] open connections
Title: Help: Why this mail couldn't be sent to us?
I would disable it anyway and use MxGuard or Declude which will allow
you to use multiple scanners instead of just one.
Joe Raykiewicz wrote:
I am
currently wanting to upgrade to 8.20,
but am using Imails Antivirus. They no
That interface and features are EXACTLY what we should have in Imail by
now. Who's mail server software is that?
Dev wrote:
My bad for not being hyper-accurate with my
terminology.
True, "tarpitting" is the ability to trigger a
"time-out" period against originating IP's that exceed
a
ping
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
sorry for this I just applied HF2.
Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
ping
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe
:)
The board was awfully quiet so I thought I would check.
Thanks, Scott!
R. Scott Perry wrote:
ping
pong. :)
-Scott
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
on their part.
HE They could have made this function better while at it.
HE H.
HE Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
no period of time so they can simply open
another connection and keep
doing so.
Tom Pepper wrote
-
Original Message -
From:
Matrosity
Tech Support
To:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent:
Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:33 AM
Subject:
Re: [IMail Forum] Dictionary Attacks
that's because imail doesn't have tarpitting by definition.
S.J.Stanait
are there newer templates since these problems effect web messaging and
calendaring?
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
HF2 is addressing the 5 vulnerabilites found in Imail -
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13727/credit/
Darrell
---
DLAnalyzer -
no period of time so they can simply open another connection and keep
doing so.
Tom Pepper wrote:
IMail 8.20: After the maximum invalid recipients are reached, the SMTPD
will close the connection.
How long is this IP address denied access to the server? Is it reset after
a period of
backup?
Rob Taylor wrote:
I added a new host to Imail and entered an IP that was already in use.
The new host tied itself in with an existing host.
Thinking it to be no problem, to fix this, I deleted the new host
addition and it also modified the existing host information, it was
now
restore it to your desktop and look through it to check it against your
existing registry. Since your primary host hasn't ever change it should
be easy to compare and fix manually.
Rob Taylor wrote:
I have Backup Exec and looking at a restore, the System State is white
but the question I
thing you speak of?? :)
- Mike (someone who's been slacking off on his backups recently)
- Original Message -
From: "Matrosity Tech Support" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Spam] [IMail Forum]
need to do one of
the above or dump Imail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:01 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTPD Memory usage
I'm sure
at all. Search your logs for
invalid user and see how many hits you get. Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:55 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum
Eric,
Sorry to be a pest but where are we at on the smtp memory leak???
Bill
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
ALso make sure your NAT device also allows ESMTP (using the EHLO
command) or even if they have ot checked in the client it won't go
eric S
- Original Message - From: Chris Gibson [EMAIL
No! good
Which version are you running? 8.2 HF1
What OS? Win2K SP4
What kind of hardware? Dell
How long does it run before needing a reboot? not consistent but ram usage grows above 100 MB's in about 2 hrs
for 8.2 you should see memory between 6 and 20 mb for smaller installs but it
can grow
just create a 2 letter alias to a 3 letter username
Flint wrote:
Last I checked (and it still seems to be working for the one client
who insisted on a two character name), The 2 character names worked
fine in Aliases but not as usernames..
Anton
- Original Message - From: Jim Comerford
2 for us
John Carter wrote:
Now that MaxInvalidRcptsPerSession has been available for a month or so in
8.20, are there any opinions on a good setting (realizing your mileage may
vary)?
Thanks,
John
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
I asked this question with no reply from ipswitch:
How much ram is your smtpd32 service using on average? Ours seems to
just keep using memory until a bounce of the service. Is this normal?
Sorry for hijacking the thread...
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
This will not work as IMail will not accept a
this problem.. If you find anything out, I
would appreciate any suggestions.. I will do the same..
So to answer your question, when operating normally, ~11 to 12 Meg..
Anton
Information Boulevard
- Original Message - From: Matrosity Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum
I'm not real excited about going into every domain we host each time
some problem like this arises but it really would be nice if we had
global rules to handle this.
Dan Horne wrote:
Not if I nor any of my clients conduct business in German.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
How much ram is your smtpd32 service using on average? Ours seems to
just keep using memory until a bounce of the service. Is this normal?
Bill
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge
Below is spam that I received two of this morning. You can't see the '=20' in
the original email but a view of the source reveals them. Would a filter
looking for =20 actually get these or would it cause problems?
Submitting your website in search engines may increase your online sales =
sorry, forgot to remove the other stuff but I changed the subject so
your thread is fine.
Darin Cox wrote:
What does this have to do with who John Hunt is?
I think you hijacked the thread...
- Original Message -
From: "Matrosity Tech Support" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: I
message, it says:
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the headers; thus, we are on the same thread.
RTFM. This ain't exactly Rocket Surgery.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 11:18 AM
they're most likely undeliverable bounces so you can delete them after
however many days you feel is comfortable. Just look at a few of them to
make sure they're to bad addresses. You can setup ispcln.exe to delete
them automatically so search the kb for that.
dave wanta wrote:
hi all,
I'm
I'm trying to determine who at one of our client's offices may have a
virus or worm. I ran the analyzer using the smtpd errors and it came
back with 2,160 invalid user IP = client IP. What is this supposed to
tell me?
Thanks,
Bill
To Unsubscribe:
yup
Kevin Fenn wrote:
I made the change under the SMTP Security tab, and then applied the changes.
However the copying of incoming and outgoing email has not started yet. Do
I need to stop and restart the SMTP service to accept the changes?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're using MXGuard, Clam and F-Prot which certainly works better than
Ipswitch's single AV.
Michael Graveen wrote:
At 11:05 AM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
Hello
all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a
situation I
am having with IP Switch, along with a recommendation on AV
products.
agreed. Probably would have been a better move to include Clam into ICS
than Symantec.
Lee Cox wrote:
We are using FProt and ClamAV with MXguard. It is a very effective package.
With the spike in Virus activity last week and this week, we stopped over
2500 viruses from getting to our users.
Why not just run imail with another AV?
Jason Loven wrote:
So anyone currently running the
Symantec solution for Imail will be in this position when their current
license runs out?Well isn't that sweet. Guess we'll be making plans to
get away from Imail then at that rate. What the
I'm sure the folks at Declude would be happy to help you.
Chris Moody wrote:
I should point out that this was for Declude Junkmail.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Moody" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: [IMail
use this one:
http://www.vantekcommunications.com/spam/url-domain-bl.txt
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
Martin Schaible wrote:
Hi,
I checked the new url-domain-bl.txt for swiss and german domains. I think, the
editor had
no clue about what he added to the list.
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:07 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] control access list
Would you mind sharing your list so I can check it out? I think this would
be as valuable to everyone as the url-domain file.
Thanks
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
