at other options.
I'm always open to better ideas
.rick..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
The statement I
Server is more pricy than WS, but since there are no Microsoft protocols
running on the server
MS tcp/ip is an MS protocol
Len
_
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites
To Unsubscribe:
: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:49 PM
To: Devaprasad Kantharaj
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
Hi,
Prasad brings it to the point. Use Windows 2003 Server, at least double the
memory and your IMail
server will be happy for the rest of its live
, October 19, 2004 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!
what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct me if I am
wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions.
If your AV
RE: If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I
HIGHLY recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why
your performance might be degrading.
I found the opposite to be true - I used to run IMail on Win2K Server and switched to
Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!
what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct
me if I am
wrong but there is AV software available for all
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
The statement I was replying to was that Windows workstation was required
for the AV product and that was my bad I reversed workstation and server
when I read it. But you could have stayed with workstation
John Carter wrote:
I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us.
(Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude
on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a
The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus insisted
upon it.
.rick..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading
I have Imail installed on a Dell server with Win2000SRV for Primary. Same
hardware but WinXP Pro (not my idea) for the backup server. The main
server, on the same hardware, is almost twice as fast at
Declude/Fprot/Imail. Neither box runs anything else continually (the backup
has a program that
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
The only reason we chose server over workstation was our
antivirus insisted
upon it.
.rick..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
Sent: Tuesday, October 19
Hey John,
If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I HIGHLY
recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why your
performance might be degrading.
You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive if
Hi,
Prasad brings it to the point. Use Windows 2003 Server, at least double the memory and
your IMail
server will be happy for the rest of its live.
Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 um 00:05 schrieben Sie:
Hey John,
If you are speaking of using a
13 matches
Mail list logo
