On Jan 01, 2007, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Thank you for reporting this issue. I will fix it later.
libqemu.a(kvm-tpr-opt.o): In function `enable_vapic':
/house/cmarenas/kvm-58/qemu/kvm-tpr-opt.c:221: undefined reference to
`kvm_enable_vapic'
i still get this on i686 using kvm-59. (log at
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:06:00AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Jan 01, 2007, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Thank you for reporting this issue. I will fix it later.
libqemu.a(kvm-tpr-opt.o): In function `enable_vapic':
/house/cmarenas/kvm-58/qemu/kvm-tpr-opt.c:221: undefined reference to
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:37:23PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
if nothing is available hp's testdrive have some itanium systems that
could be
used at least to validate the userspace part builds (as I did) :
On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 22:25 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:23 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
I've not
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
Avi, how would you like patches to fix build issues in ia64 to be handled?,
should be expected that kvm releases build for ia64? is there any system that
could be used as part of a compile farm / testing for ia64?
In theory every commit should compile and
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
Thank you for reporting this issue. I will fix it later.
libqemu.a(kvm-tpr-opt.o): In function `enable_vapic':
/house/cmarenas/kvm-58/qemu/kvm-tpr-opt.c:221: undefined reference to
`kvm_enable_vapic'
Xiantao, are there any plans to merge into qemu all
Avi Kivity wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
Avi, how would you like patches to fix build issues in ia64 to be
handled?, should be expected that kvm releases build for ia64? is
there any system that could be used as part of a compile farm /
testing for ia64?
In theory every
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
if nothing is available hp's testdrive have some itanium systems
that could be used at least to validate the userspace part builds
(as I did) :
http://www.testdrive.hp.com/systems/itanium.shtml
I prefer a cross compiler, but if that turns out to
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
if nothing is available hp's testdrive have some itanium systems
that could be used at least to validate the userspace part builds
(as I did) :
http://www.testdrive.hp.com/systems/itanium.shtml
I prefer a cross compiler, but if that turns
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
I tried setting up a crosstool environment, but I couldn't get
binutils (2.18 and 2.18.50.0.3) to build (FC6 and F8, both x86_64).
Frankly speaking, I have no experience on it. But seems this page can
help us :
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
if nothing is available hp's testdrive have some itanium systems that could be
used at least to validate the userspace part builds (as I did) :
http://www.testdrive.hp.com/systems/itanium.shtml
I signed up for an account, but they don't allow ssh
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:37:23PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
if nothing is available hp's testdrive have some itanium systems that
could be
used at least to validate the userspace part builds (as I did) :
http://www.testdrive.hp.com/systems/itanium.shtml
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:58:23PM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
kvm-58 as released doesn't build in ia64 either because of the tpr/vapic
changes that were done at release date as shown by :
gcc -Wl,-G0
Hi, Xiantao
diff --git a/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h b/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h
index be409c7..2d91cb9 100644
--- a/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h
+++ b/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
#define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
-
-#define TARGET_PAGE_BITS 14
+#define TARGET_PAGE_BITS 16
Do we need to use
Akio Takebe wrote:
Hi, Xiantao
diff --git a/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h b/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h index
be409c7..2d91cb9 100644 --- a/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h
+++ b/qemu/target-ia64/cpu.h
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
#define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
-
-#define TARGET_PAGE_BITS 14
+#define
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
From: Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:47:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu : Fix ia64 build on latest
Amit Shah wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:23 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
I've not checked the patch yet; but a curiosity question: Do you also
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
From: Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:47:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu : Fix ia64 build on latest source.
Due to last merge with qemu
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:23 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
I've not checked the patch yet; but a curiosity question: Do you also test x86
compiles / builds?
Amit Shah wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:23 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
I've not checked the patch yet; but a curiosity question: Do you also
On Friday 21 December 2007 23:38:14 Izik Eidus wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:23 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed, and
leads to build fail
, this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
I've not checked the
Amit Shah wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 20:28:23 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi, Avi
Due to last merge with Qemu upstream, some interfaces are changed,
and leads to build fail , this patch fixed them.
Xiantao
I've not checked the patch yet; but a curiosity question: Do you also
test x86
22 matches
Mail list logo
