I suppose I spoke too soon, for when I compiled the code, the result was
actually the same.
HC
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 7:47 AM Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
> Indeed, that helps tremendously. Thank you so much!!!
>
> Hwaen Ch'uqi
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 7:24 AM Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> Am
> […]
> Well, the explanation wasn't that brief. Sorry that I didn't have
> time to write a shorter one, as they say.
PS: Maybe I should mention that at the time I went down the rabbit
hole of Python packaging in general because of Frescobaldi, I wrote
two articles on the LinuxFR site, which may
> unfortunately, as I noted above, the problem seems to be that frescobaldi
> depends on a now-deprecated version of qtwebengine, and without updating
> it we'll eventually reach a point where it no longer runs. I looked into
> this because qtwebengine-5.15 failed to compile on my machine this
> I own a bunch of Macs. In fact, right here in my studio I have two late-2014
> Mac Minis with fresh Monterey installs which are completely unused. I also
> have a *really* excellent [fibre] internet connection — it usually hovers near
> 900Mbps up and down (though right now it’s only at 200Mbps
> Just had a quick look. It seems to me we need to create a python-poppler-qt6,
> port qpageview to Qt6 and of course frescobaldi itself. I would hope that
> qpageview and frescobaldi both basically mean moving from PyQt5 to PyQt6 which
> I expect to be mostly busy work. The poppler bindings seem
> Thanks, but unfortunately the kind of work needed is deeply technical, not
> busy work.
>
Just had a quick look. It seems to me we need to create a python-poppler-qt6,
port qpageview to Qt6 and of course frescobaldi itself. I would hope that
qpageview and frescobaldi both basically mean
> I understood that. I was responding in particular to Jean’s comment
>
> > NB: I don't own a macOS machine, which of course makes all testing very
> difficult
>
> but also offering the hardware for use in whatever way it might be helpful
> (e.g., compilation, not just testing).
>
> Cheers,
>
Hi,
> unfortunately, as I noted above, the problem seems to be that frescobaldi
> depends on a now-deprecated version of qtwebengine, and without updating it
> we'll eventually reach a point where it no longer runs.
I understood that. I was responding in particular to Jean’s comment
> NB: I
Hi All,
The Qt5 dependency seems a much more serious and important issue than the
packaging for macOS. Although an app bundle installer is most desirable for
ordinary macOS users, there are alternatives such as MacPorts and Homebrew. I’m
currently running Frescobaldi from the latest source
Hi Kieren,
unfortunately, as I noted above, the problem seems to be that frescobaldi
depends on a now-deprecated version of qtwebengine, and without updating it
we'll eventually reach a point where it no longer runs. I looked into this
because qtwebengine-5.15 failed to compile on my machine this
Hi all,
>> If there is busy work that needs to be done on the project, I can do that,
>> but I also don't own a Mac.
I own a bunch of Macs. In fact, right here in my studio I have two late-2014
Mac Minis with fresh Monterey installs which are completely unused. I also have
a *really*
> If there is busy work that needs to be done on the project, I can do that, but
> I also don't own a Mac.
Thanks, but unfortunately the kind of work needed is deeply technical, not busy
work.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 4:15 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Doing some system updates today, I see that frescobaldi is the only
> program that requires PyQtWebEngine:5, which in turn requires
> qtwebengine:5. Looking at the frescobaldi page, I see a somewhat concerning
> note that the project is on
> Is Frescobaldi the most common tool on Linux, or what do the majority of
> Lilypond users use?
Frescobaldi is the most common LilyPond editor, on all OSes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Indeed, that helps tremendously. Thank you so much!!!
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 7:24 AM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Am So., 28. Apr. 2024 um 06:25 Uhr schrieb Hwaen Ch'uqi <
> hwaench...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am trying to typeset a stack of spoken lines above a
I use Frescobaldi on all of my Macs with slightly different operating systems.
It works well, but I'm concerned about the future. Unfortunately, I'm not a
programmer, so I can't contribute with coding. This is exciting, perhaps a bit
too exciting, considering how we'll be able to continue with
Am So., 28. Apr. 2024 um 06:25 Uhr schrieb Hwaen Ch'uqi :
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am trying to typeset a stack of spoken lines above a multimeasure rest.
> This works fine when preceded by notes in the same system. However, when it
> follows a forced break, the output is not so desirable. Can
> Doing some system updates today, I see that frescobaldi is the only program
> that requires PyQtWebEngine:5, which in turn requires qtwebengine:5. Looking
> at the frescobaldi page, I see a somewhat concerning note that the project is
> on the verge of being unmaintained, due to this dependency
Paolo Prete wrote:
Note that there's also this (no trial-and-error):
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00142.html
But it doesn't compile with 2.24...
That's due to merge request !818 [1], applied between 2.23.3 and 2.23.4.
Simon Albrecht ran into the same problem
Hi List,
Doing some system updates today, I see that frescobaldi is the only program
that requires PyQtWebEngine:5, which in turn requires qtwebengine:5.
Looking at the frescobaldi page, I see a somewhat concerning note that the
project is on the verge of being unmaintained, due to this
20 matches
Mail list logo
