Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Robert Davies
- Original Message - From: "Andre Hedrick" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Linux on Abit Motherboards" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 6:09 AM Subject: re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale As you see all benchmarks work. This is running both HPT366 channels. This is also an

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Rogier Wolff
Daniel Smolik wrote: [Charset iso-8859-2 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] Andre Hedrick wrote: hdparm -t /dev/hdc /dev/hdb /dev/hda /dev/hdc: Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.89 seconds = 22.15 MB/sec /dev/hdb: Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.00 seconds = 21.33

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Rogier Wolff
Daniel Smolik wrote: ./DiskPerf /dev/hdc ; ./DiskPerf /dev/hdb ; ./DiskPerf /dev/hda Sorry, where I can get DiskPerf ? It doesn't compile for me "out of the box". Roger. -- ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes

[LINUX-ABIT] Re: UDMA66 Problem

2000-12-05 Thread Robert Davies
Thanks Mike, there's been some interest in alternatives to HPT on linux-abit list. So as you said I could forward it, I will. Cheers, Rob PS. For a laugh take a look at http://bofhcam.org/co-larters/index.html part of the O'Really network ;) - Original Message - From: "Michael

re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
| From: Andre Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for responding. I'm very interested in what you post, but first I must say that it really doesn't relate to what I intended to say in my message. My message was warning about a design "feature" of the board that limits the total number of bus

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Vidiot
My message was warning about a design "feature" of the board that limits the total number of bus mastering boards in PCI slots 4 and 5 to one. This was not explained at all in my manual, and needs to be made very clear to all who might try to sonfigure a BP6 system. Hugh Redelmeier It is plain

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Rogier Wolff
D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: - The BP6 manual suggests that the HPT366 was designed for hard disks and recommends not using it for other ATA/ATAPI devices such as CD drives. Do you feel that this recommendation applies to LINUX (i.e. is it a feature of dubious BIOS or MSWindows drivers,

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Robert Davies
- Original Message - From: "D. Hugh Redelmeier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Discussion List for Linux on Abit Motherboards" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:03 AM Subject: re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale | From: Andre Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Rogier Wolff wrote: Daniel Smolik wrote: ./DiskPerf /dev/hdc ; ./DiskPerf /dev/hdb ; ./DiskPerf /dev/hda Sorry, where I can get DiskPerf ? It doesn't compile for me "out of the box". Rogier please try again with the stuff in the mail. Only the noise maker of

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Wu Liu
I seem to recall reading somewhere (a review of one of the first Intel 440BX-based motherboards designed with more than 4 PCI slots; I don't remember which one) where the reviewer mentioned that due to limitations in the chipset, only 4 IRQs were available among the 5 PCI slots. This meant that

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Robert Davies
I seem to recall reading somewhere (a review of one of the first Intel 440BX-based motherboards designed with more than 4 PCI slots; I don't remember which one) where the reviewer mentioned that due to limitations in the chipset, only 4 IRQs were available among the 5 PCI slots. This meant

[LINUX-ABIT] 2.2.18

2000-12-05 Thread Ahmon Dancy
1) Where does one locate this 2.2.18 kernel that people keep talking about? 2) I would like to also thank Andre for his IDE work. It is probably one of the most important contributions to linux speed on PCs. 3) I have a broken (while trying to do the capacitor trick) BP6 mobo I can

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 2.2.18

2000-12-05 Thread Ahmon Dancy
I mean the kernel itself (not the IDE patches for it) On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.18/ -- =- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -= =-body of "unsubscribe linux-abit".

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Wu Liu wrote: I seem to recall reading somewhere (a review of one of the first Intel 440BX-based motherboards designed with more than 4 PCI It was a 440FX UP/SMP PPRO and I have one. Cheers, Andre Hedrick CTO Timpanogas Research Group EVP Linux Development, TRG Linux ATA

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 2.2.18

2000-12-05 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ahmon Dancy wrote: I mean the kernel itself (not the IDE patches for it) On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.18/ http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/linux-2.2.17.tar.bz2

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] BP6 PCI slots 4 5 share Bus Master Control Signal (badly) [was Re: a cautionary tale]

2000-12-05 Thread Robert Davies
- Original Message - From: "D. Hugh Redelmeier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Discussion List for Linux on Abit Motherboards" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 6:42 PM Subject: [LINUX-ABIT] BP6 PCI slots 4 5 share Bus Master Control Signal (badly) [was Re: a cautionary tale]

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Rogier Wolff
Robert Davies wrote: [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] What you say is true, but Abit went into denial on the problems, broke the GPL on Gentus, by including Andre's updated driver and didn't even show him the source. Finally on the Rev 1.1 their return policy was

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Robert Davies
the source. Finally on the Rev 1.1 their return policy was apalling, why should the customers end up soldering alternative caps on boards? Stop! As far as I know, they have offered: - Take your board to your vendor, or send it to us. However, in either case it will take us 3 to 4 weeks

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] a cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 07:58:04PM -, Robert Davies wrote: Yes, but a good policy would be to swap the board, then fix it and send to another customer sending it back. Probably what a very good dealer would do my board failed for a different reason and my dealer just swapped the boards.

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] Re: BP6 Caps - was cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:40:31PM -0600, Vidiot wrote: OK, for those of us who are clueless about this cap thing, what is it all about? Is there an on-line web page that explains the problem and the cure? the problem is that a capacitor behind a regulator was not changed when a higher

Re: [LINUX-ABIT] Re: BP6 Caps - was cautionary tale

2000-12-05 Thread Ahmon Dancy
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Vidiot wrote: Is there an easy way to identify the version of the board without taking the board out? yes. it's called a mirror. use it to look at the lower part of the ISA slot. there is a sticker. if it annoiunces v1.0 you're all set. if you have v1.1 you may be