On 8/22/05, Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:23:00PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Did a quick browse of their website. Download seems to be
Windows only, or am I missing something?
It user SIP, so you can use any program or device
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the filesystem image in the file ? If so, what
version of mount etc is this ?
thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:01:37AM +0300, Peter wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the filesystem image in the file ?
Yes.
If
Interesting that according to IANA:
http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htm#p
the text , Occupied is not considered necessary. All the other
examples quoted (Falklands/Malvinas, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Democratic
Republic of Korea etc) remain with their extended versions.
RP
I try to install and configure openssi cluster on FC3.
We succeed to install , boot the kernel , and get some failover between 2
nodes from the cluster.
I cannot get loadbalancing using ha-lvs that is inculded in kernel.
Does anybody know how to do it ?
Thank you
Camelia Botez
System admin
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:05:01PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
Hi,
Your problem with the mlterm settings, which apparently was not
addressed in the answers you received, caught my eye, because I
am also contemplating moving to UTF8, and because I grew to be
addicted to my habits. I would,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:01:37AM +0300, Peter wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 8/22/05, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the filesystem
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:26:16PM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:05:01PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
Hi,
Your problem with the mlterm settings, which apparently was not
addressed in the answers you received, caught my eye, because I
am also contemplating
When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
without specifying its limits (size) ? What if I have another
partition at the end of the one I need - isn't there a chance it will
be overwritten?
What I meant by /dev/loop0p1 (look at a file in fdisk), is whether
there's a way
Hi all,
I have this problem which comes without warning on my box, it seems / gets
remounted (without any warning, not reason) as read only. I can use the box
without real big problems, until something needs to write to the disk (for
example konqueror gets a file from the web or something as
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:29:42PM +0300, Itay Duvdevani wrote:
When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
without specifying its limits (size)?
Interesting question. I believe so - at least for the file systems
I've used this with, the file system always knows where
On Monday 22 August 2005 22:58, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
In other words, mount the whole file as a disk rather than a
partition. I'm not familiar with a comfortable way of doing it.
Interesting scenario. If the file contains a disk image (with
partition table etc.) than what is actually needed is
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Oron Peled wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2005 22:58, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
In other words, mount the whole file as a disk rather than a
partition. I'm not familiar with a comfortable way of doing it.
Interesting scenario. If the file contains a disk image (with
On 8/23/05, Itay Duvdevani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
without specifying its limits (size) ? What if I have another
partition at the end of the one I need - isn't there a chance it will
be overwritten?
Not if the filesystem
On 8/23/05, Itay Duvdevani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
without specifying its limits (size) ? What if I have another
partition at the end of the one I need - isn't there a chance it will
be overwritten?
loopback mounting does
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:55:41AM +0300, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Hi all,
I have this problem which comes without warning on my box, it seems / gets
remounted (without any warning, not reason) as read only. I can use the box
without real big problems, until something needs to write to the
17 matches
Mail list logo
