Amos
That is a great answer for network connections. Thanks - I am familiar
with netstat -p
My question regards DISK IO, (remember when processes were said to be
io-bound or cpu-bound?)
I have a simply question, namely How many disk block reads and writes
is a process doing over a given
On 27/12/06, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/12/06, Ori Idan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to me an X issue, however it is strange that on my system I can
not reproduce this bug.
I use debian unstable with x.org, with gnome 2.14.2 the bug does not
appear nither in firefox nor
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:51, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I've STFW and cannot find how to do what I need. I want that
CTRL-[HebrewLetter] give the same functionality that
CTRL-[EnglishLetter] gives. For instance, CTRL-ב should be copy,
because ב shares a key with C. I use the KDE desktop, ...
As
Danny Lieberman wrote:
I have a simply question, namely How many disk block reads and writes
is a process doing over a given period of time, and what is the minimum,
maximum and average stats
This seemingly trivial question (which can easily be answered in a
Windows operating system using
I think that the gprof output and equivalent is the furthest one can go
to appreciate IO stats. I simply measured disk system throughput (using
hdparm etc) and then tuned my programs until they ran almost that fast,
then stopped worrying. For other types of IO the maximum bandwidth can
be
Peter
As a general approach for tuning a complex, working system, the first
step is to identify bottlenecks under real load, that includes both IO
rates per process and CPU rate per process.
Your method is good for a static system where you have complete control
of the applications - I am not
Gilad
I disagree that this is a situation dependent issue;
I am aware of Linux o/s architecture, and I realize that caching is
problematic. The topic appears in a note Andrew Morton wrote on his
latest version of io-acccounting in kernel 2.6.something.
Let's say (for the sake of argument, we
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Peter
As a general approach for tuning a complex, working system, the first step is
to identify bottlenecks under real load, that includes both IO rates per
process and CPU rate per process.
Your method is good for a static system where you have
Gilad
One more input, which is important (imho) - this is a performance
measurement / system tuning objective, not a system accounting
application - i.e.we are not trying to charge someone
for io usage ( i think they used to do that once upon a time).
10x
dL
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
I think that you should take a good look at the gperf etc output. (even
time(bash)) gives some hints (e.g. system time of a program ~= IO load
it produces, if IO is a major part of the runtime).
Peter
=
To unsubscribe, send
On 12/26/06, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/12/06, Ori Idan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to me an X issue, however it is strange that on my system I can
not reproduce this bug.
I use debian unstable with x.org, with gnome 2.14.2 the bug does not appear
nither in firefox
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:31:02PM +0200, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Let's say (for the sake of argument, we do it the io-accounting way
- i.e. count cache io) - the numbers will be skewed, but they will
be skewed for everyone.
I would settle for a io stats per process (similar to sar, perhaps)
On 12/27/06, Beni Cherniavsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that this is already partially fixed by the toolkits, most
notably GTK.
As Havoc Pennington already noted in the Mozilla bug 69230, Gtk has special
code to handle it in the GtkKeyHash class:
On 27/12/06, Ilya Konstantinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, Beni Cherniavsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that this is already partially fixed by the toolkits, most
notably GTK.
As Havoc Pennington already noted in the Mozilla bug 69230, Gtk has special
code to handle it in
Muli
Thanks. YDM.
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:31:02PM +0200, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Let's say (for the sake of argument, we do it the io-accounting way
- i.e. count cache io) - the numbers will be skewed, but they will
be skewed for everyone.
I would settle for a io
On 12/27/06, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm willing to forego the convinience of having the Dvorak layout
working like qwerty for modifier purposes
Yeah, but we cannot fix a bug by introducing a bug for another user. To be
precise, you may implement it into your private build of
On 27/12/06, Ilya Konstantinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm willing to forego the convinience of having the Dvorak layout
working like qwerty for modifier purposes
Yeah, but we cannot fix a bug by introducing a bug for another user. To be
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Wed, 27 Dec:
On 19/12/06, Cyril SCETBON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi people,
Anyone has links to see streaming from israel with mplayer ?
Haven't tried all but I think it should work:
these also seem OK:
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 07:52, Amichai Rotman wrote:
It would be nice to join forces and create a searchable database containing
all Open Source / Free browsers non-friendly sites and companies, kind of
an official black list to create pressure on said companies to make a
change ASAP...
Hi guys,
I have recently been very pleased to notice that Bank Discount's online
operations website (Telebank Discont) started to work with Firefox! This is a
very welcome change, as it removes one of the last reasons to keep aroung
Windows at all.
I encourage you all to start using that
http://wiki.osdc.org.il/
http://www.hackers.org.il/
On 12/28/06, Alex Gontmakher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 03:18, you wrote:
Let's collect a list of FireFox friendly sites (white list). It could
give good example and encourage the rest to support FF.
Good idea. Is
On 28/12/06, Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone got more illegal links to post to the list? :-)
Sorry, I wasn't aware that there is anything illegal about these links. I
got them from a Tapuz Forum post, where Tapuz is particularly touchy about
putting anything illegal (or even
22 matches
Mail list logo
