Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 07/07/2016 07:56 PM, RDP wrote: > On 6 July 2016 at 17:28, Christian Schoenebeck > wrote: [..] >> Anyway, I approved your forum user, so you should be able to post now on all >> forums without moderation. And I also changed the board's settings so that >> newly

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On Thursday, July 07, 2016 18:56:40 RDP wrote: > > Anyway, I approved your forum user, so you should be able to post now on > > all forums without moderation. And I also changed the board's settings so > > that newly registered users can at least immediately post on the "Newbies > > & Support"

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 6 July 2016 at 17:28, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > On Sunday, July 03, 2016 20:12:12 RDP wrote: >> On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck >> >> wrote: > I was not even aware that posts of newly registered users were forced

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On Sunday, July 03, 2016 20:12:12 RDP wrote: > On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck > > wrote: > > Well, you can simply start a topic on bb.linuxsampler.org and update your > > (i.e. upper most) post with the latest version of the text. Of course I > > can

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 21:09:20 Robin Gareus wrote: > On 06/29/2016 08:17 PM, RDP wrote: > > On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote: > >> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > >>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, > >>>

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 29 June 2016 at 20:09, Robin Gareus wrote: >> Might it not be a good idea for this discussion to be taken here, >> >>http://bb.linuxsampler.org/ >> >> .. with some drafts published ( wiki style ), so that such a beast >> can be formalised? >> > > wiki-style sounds good

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/29/2016 08:17 PM, RDP wrote: > On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote: >> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > >>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate >>> and suggest >>> clear license terms by yourself which

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote: > On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: >> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate >> and suggest >> clear license terms by yourself which could become a candidate to resolve >>

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > However writing such a long new license text takes a load of free time (which > is already quite limited on my side), energy, research and finally a clear > consent by the developers. I understand. I am however of the strong opinion that

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 22:24:08 you wrote: > On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > Robin, please understand that this issue had been discussed over and over > > again on this list. So please refer to the list archive on this one. You > > are really not adding anything new on

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 22:16:41 Robin Gareus wrote: > I'd like users to respect the intention of the authors of this IMHO > great software. But I very much wish for these intentions to be clearly > solidified by a proper license (until a time comes where software > licensing becomes

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > You know the terms under which LinuxSampler is released, its > clearly and prominently written on the website Sadly no, those terms as self contradictory and hence invalid. One can only assume or guess your intentions. You're on the safe

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Robin, please understand that this issue had been discussed over and over > again on this list. So please refer to the list archive on this one. You are > really not adding anything new on this topic and this has also been discussed > with