Re: [Logcheck-devel] Logcheck database updates on stable

2016-03-19 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:46:43PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > Would it be possible to have updates of logcheck rules for stable, > either via backports or proposed-updates, so that it can be useful by > default on stable systems? I'll look after logcheck within the next weeks. Best regards

Re: [Logcheck-devel] [PATCH] Set VERSION to the current version (i.e. 1.3.16).

2014-10-18 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
fixed in 3b37edb, thanks ___ Logcheck-devel mailing list Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel

Re: [Logcheck-devel] Opinion on #742069

2014-04-03 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:31:42AM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: On a similar note. I have already accumulated a few regexes to add to postfix. In my case, I have plenty of lines for postfix/submission/smtpd. I don't know how's postfix criteria to create these log lines, but it seems it is

Re: [Logcheck-devel] logcheck and bash

2014-02-03 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:40:48AM +0900, Drey Tee wrote: Sorry for bothering you, but I can't find a solution for my problem. I installed 1.3.14 on freebsd from src, followed install instructions, but stuck on starting because bash is installed in /usr/local/bin/bash and not in /bin/bash

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#712941: logcheck-database: logcheck triggers a fatal error in egrep

2013-07-01 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
tags 712941 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hello, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 07:33:51PM -0400, shiz...@vif.com wrote: Since I upgraded to wheezy in may, logcheck reports contain only one line: egrep: character class syntax is [[:space:]], not [:space:] I'm not able to reproduce this issue

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#652148: Bug#652148: Please add rules for dropbear

2011-12-16 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
# fixed in 20a68db tags 652148 + pending thanks Hello, Thanks for your contribution. I've added the rules to git[0]. Best regards Hannes [0] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=commit;h=20a68dbcc687700e37fdcefdc423bdc24822f4ad

Re: [Logcheck-devel] small amavisd logcheck match

2011-09-07 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 05:00:01PM -0700, John Clements wrote: It turns out that on my machine, amavisd-new doesn't necessarily include a Message-ID field in its log lines. Also, it now appears to place quarantined messages into subdirectories indexed by a single character. Thanks for your

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#613124: Bug#613124: rule update for changed snmp log messages

2011-09-02 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:48:05PM +0200, Uwe Storbeck wrote: For me these log messages contain a space at the end of the line (snmpd version 5.4.3~dfsg-2). So this rule may need an additional ? or * at the end to work for all cases: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ snmpd\[[0-9]+\]:

Re: [Logcheck-devel] Shell Expansion in logcheck.logfiles

2011-07-11 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Florian Mutter wrote: Jeff Jansen bamakoj...@gmail.com Wed Jan 30 02:02:01 UTC 2008: [...] I found this old mail and wanted to ask, if there is any plan to include this patch? I think there is also a little bug in the patch. It needs to be 'ls -1

Re: [Logcheck-devel] Requesting clarification on a few things

2011-07-08 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote: One thing that Hannes mentioned was in response to commits 5f7da05[1] and cf5e9d3[2] which I made to address bug #590559[3]. As he mentioned in his email, webmin was removed from the Debian archive over five years ago[4]. He

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#609649: cron-apt: Insufficient logcheck patterns

2011-01-13 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, Thanks for your contribution. Could you please provide some example log lines showing the new format? Greetings Hannes ___ Logcheck-devel mailing list Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#609649: cron-apt: Insufficient logcheck patterns

2011-01-13 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:57:25PM +0100, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: I've asked you for some example log lines so I can test my rule changes before committing them to the git repository. If you want you can send me the log lines in private if they should contain any confidential

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#588312: Bug#588312: logcheck-database: updated rules for many packages

2010-07-08 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, Like Gerfried said, please file different bug reports for different packages the next time. Some comments about your rule suggestions: Radosław Antoniuk wrote: #dkimproxy ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: connect from .*$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#588285: Bug#588285: logcheck: Additional rules to ignore successful kerberos authentication

2010-07-08 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Michel Messerschmidt wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 06:26:10PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: I wonder if the right way of handling this would be to instead install a logcheck rule as part of the libpam-krb5 package that looks something like: ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

Re: [Logcheck-devel] Question about logcheck on redhat

2010-06-14 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Juan Manuel Perrote wrote: Hello my name is Juan Manuel. I interested on install logcheck on RedHat Linux 64 bit, please can you tell if is logcheck compatible with this operating system, and where I can download the latest version. You can download the latest source tarball using the source

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#583600: Bug#583600: ignore individual entries but write summaries

2010-05-29 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
tag 583600 +wontfix thanks Hi, interesting feature request, but due to the current design of logcheck it is not practicable. So I tag this bug as wontfix. Greetings Hannes ___ Logcheck-devel mailing list Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#583155: Bug#583155: logcheck-database: Please create rules for amavis(d-new)

2010-05-26 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
reassign 583155 amavisd-new thanks Hi, amavisd-new has its own rules for logcheck. So I reassign this bug to amavisd-new. However the current version of amavisd-new does not contain the rules, due to the missing taking back of changeset 7899d57341c4 (while changeset a08df29d4ad7 has been

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#578749: Bug#578749: logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect session opened

2010-04-22 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Didier Raboud wrote: The /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect the session opened messages that are IMHO completely normal. The attached patch solves this. Can you please provide some sample log lines and/or a patch against the HEAD code in the logcheck git? Thanks Hannes

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#574858: Bug#574858: logcheck: Does not ignore unresolvable hostname

2010-04-16 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
tags 574858 +moreinfo thanks Bob Proulx wrote: I believe what was intended was the following: # Hostname either fully qualified or not. if [ $FQDN -eq 1 ]; then HOSTNAME=$(hostname --fqdn 2/dev/null) else HOSTNAME=$(hostname --short 2/dev/null) fi Fixed in

Re: [Logcheck-devel] [PATCH] commit 941a3c38cccde0b30dfd3b641e40f6a6f35ce3b3 Author: Kerstin Puschke kpusc...@zedat.fu-berlin.de Date: Wed Mar 17 18:58:27 2010 +0100

2010-04-13 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Applied to git, thanks for contribution. Greetings Hannes Kerstin Puschke wrote: logcheck cd's to $STATEDIR before cleaning up temp dir Now you can run logcheck as a user who has no permissions for /var/lib/logcheck (where logcheck used to cd to) Signed-off-by: Kerstin Puschke

Re: [Logcheck-devel] [PATCH] commit 9a4c9f8949768da31520dd8b4780875dc2da231d Author: Kerstin Puschke kpusc...@zedat.fu-berlin.de Date: Tue Mar 23 11:12:01 2010 +0100

2010-04-13 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Applied to git, thanks for contribution. Greetings Hannes Kerstin Puschke wrote: Look for header.txt and footer.txt in $RULEDIR instead of hardcoded /etc/logcheck This makes header.txt. and footer.txt customizable even if using a non-default rule directory. Signed-off-by: Kerstin

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#569843: Bug#569843: logcheck-database: acpid filter misses trailing white space

2010-04-13 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
tags 569843 +unreproducible +moreinfo thanks Mats Erik Andersson wrote: The syslog messages for acpid when a window client connects or disconnect all have a trailing single space at each line. Therefore the existing two patterns in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/acpid fail to filter out the

Re: [Logcheck-devel] dnsmasq-(dhcp|tftp) missing from dnsmasq ignores

2010-04-12 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Michał Sawicz wrote: I'd like to point out that currently dnsmasq (as of version 2.48, see http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/CHANGELOG) marks the log messages with the subsystem, so currently messages from dhcp look like so: Mar 30 17:14:24 media dnsmasq-dhcp[1420]: DHCPREQUEST(eth1)

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#568468: Bug#568468: logcheck: ignore wpa_supplicant scan results

2010-02-05 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, This message should be filtered in workstation level. Please ensure that you use this level (set REPORTLEVEL in /etc/logcheck/logcheck.conf to workstation) and provide feedback if that solves your problem. Thanks, Hannes ___ Logcheck-devel

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#534724: Enhanced kernel rules

2010-01-19 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: Sorry for the late reply. I'm absolutely willing to submit small and useful bits, I'm just a bit unclear about the policy. If bootup messages are intentionally excluded, then some of the current rules should in fact be dropped as well. Does bootup also

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#547182: Bug#547182: logcheck-database: violations.d/sudo not catching calls to /usr/bin/sudo

2010-01-19 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
tags #547182 +unreproducible +moreinfo thanks Hi, I tried to reproduce this in squeeze and sid with no success. The log line contains only sudo not the full path /usr/bin/sudo. So I'm tagging this bug as unreproducible. Please provide more info about howto reproduce this behaviour, if its

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#565858: Bug #565858 [sslh] sslh: Please add logcheck file

2010-01-19 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, We prefer if package maintainers take care of the rules themselves and they are distributed with the package to which they apply. So if you are willing to include the rule in sslh itself it would be great, otherwise I would include it in logcheck-database. I've adjusted the rule to be a

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#534724: Bug#534724: Enhanced kernel rules

2009-09-03 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Frédéric Brière fbri...@fbriere.net wrote: Thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, I don't think anyone has the time to go through these 599 rules and sort out that big pile. From a quick glance, most of these appear to be bootup messages, which are willingly not included in

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#542536: logcheck: [PATCH] new ntpd rule - kernel time sync status change

2009-08-20 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, at first we should clarify how to handle debian bug #498992. Hannes ___ Logcheck-devel mailing list Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#542663: Bug#542663: logcheck: /etc/cron.d/logcheck runs too often (now every 2 hours)

2009-08-20 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Frédéric Brière fbri...@fbriere.net wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:51:21PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: A more appropriate default would be every 24h (once a day). I can't speak for other people, but when I was sysadmin, I wanted to be informed of any problems *now*, not the day after. I

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#535976: patch

2009-08-19 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, the attached patch adds ignore.d.server/apcupsd to ignore messages like these Aug 7 18:15:53 berlin apcupsd[2155]: UPS Self Test switch to battery. Aug 7 18:16:00 berlin apcupsd[2155]: UPS Self Test completed: Battery

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#542273: please add rule for ext3 writeback data mode

2009-08-18 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, the attached patch modifies ignore.d.server/kernel to also ignore messages like this Aug 18 20:19:51 t400 kernel: [25946.743205] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with writeback data mode. Hannes -- System Information: