On 20.03.22 16:02, Roger Price wrote:
I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE):
The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
protocol. The best example of such a failure is
On 3/21/22 15:08, Greg Troxel wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
On 20.03.22 16:02, Roger Price wrote:
I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE):
The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
implementation peculiarities that are
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 20.03.22 16:02, Roger Price wrote:
>>I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor
>>(ISE):
>>
>> The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
>> implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
>>
On 20.03.22 16:02, Roger Price wrote:
I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE):
The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
protocol. The best example of such a failure is
On 3/20/2022 2:15 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 3/20/22 22:02, gene heskett wrote:
...
Even better, hide your local network by getting a good router, reflashing
it to something like dd-wrt or its ilk, and using it to NAT your local
net somewhere in the 192.168.xxx.yyy address space but which
On 3/21/22 00:41, Greg Troxel wrote:
Manuel Wolfshant writes:
Connected to outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com..
Escape character is '^]'.
220 VE1EUR03FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL
Service ready at Sun, 20 Mar 2022 22:20:44 +
|_ssl-date:
Manuel Wolfshant writes:
> Connected to outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com..
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 VE1EUR03FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL
> Service ready at Sun, 20 Mar 2022 22:20:44 +
>
> |_ssl-date: 2022-03-20T22:22:21+00:00; 0s from scanner time.
>
On 3/21/22 00:11, Greg Troxel wrote:
Roger Price writes:
I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE):
The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
protocol. The best
Roger Price writes:
> I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor
> (ISE):
>
> The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
> implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
> protocol. The best example of such a failure is
On 3/20/22 22:02, gene heskett wrote:
On Sunday, 20 March 2022 15:10:00 EDT Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On March 20, 2022 5:02:36 PM GMT+02:00, Roger Price
wrote:
I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions
Editor (ISE):
The command VER is hazardous because it
On Sunday, 20 March 2022 15:10:00 EDT Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On March 20, 2022 5:02:36 PM GMT+02:00, Roger Price
wrote:
> >I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions
Editor (ISE):
> > The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
> > implementation
On March 20, 2022 5:02:36 PM GMT+02:00, Roger Price
wrote:
>I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE):
>
> The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
> implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
> protocol. The
I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE):
The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of
implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a
protocol. The best example of such a failure is the browser version
field in HTTP.
13 matches
Mail list logo
