Dear all,
I reviewed the draft and I do not have any further comments or concerns.
All my previous comments have been successfully addressed. Therefore, I'm
supportive of the document.
Best regards,
Marco
*From:* OAuth *On Behalf Of *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
*Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2024 2:32 PM
/issues/137
Once again thanks for your feedback.
Cheers
Pieter
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Tim Cappalli
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 8:13 PM
To: rifaat.s.ietf
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Cross-Device Flows BCP
You don't often get email from
tim.cappalli=40okta
Looks great! Some small proposed tweaks:
Nit: "SmartTV" and "Smart TV" are used interchangeably throughout the doc.
No preference on which one is used, but should be consistent.
*6.2.3.1 *
Current text: "supports a new cross-device authentication protocol, called
"hybrid""
Proposed text:
4 at 7:02 AM
To: "Saxe, Dean" , "rifaat.s.ietf"
, oauth
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Cross-Device Flows BCP
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
: Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Cross-Device Flows BCP
You don't often get email from
deansaxe=40amazon@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:deansaxe=40amazon@dmarc.ietf.org>.
Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Rifaat,
I have a few minor nits in the
pril 22, 2024 at 7:57 AM
To: oauth
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Cross-Device Flows BCP
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
We have not rec
We have not received any feedback on this document so far.
This is a reminder to review and provide feedback on this document.
If you reviewed the document, and you do not have any comments or concerns,
it would be great if you can send an email to the list indicating that.
Regards,
Rifaat
