gt; tsv-...@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh@ietf.org;
> opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-
> v6eh-05
>
> On 1/17/2024 3:34 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> > [Med] This
On 1/17/2024 3:34 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
[Med] This can be part of regular code updates. Please note that this
is not unusual in ipfix (see for example ipv4Options, natevent, etc.
in https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml which depend on
an IANA registry).
Ok; do
Hi Wes,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Wesley Eddy
Envoyé : mardi 16 janvier 2024 21:21
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; tsv-...@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05
On 1/16
On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all
of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte
usage?
*/[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify
and extract
Hi Wes,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Wesley Eddy
Envoyé : mardi 16 janvier 2024 16:09
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; tsv-...@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05
The changes look good to me; I just want to make sure you understand one
of my questions that doesn't look like it was clear enough:
On 1/15/2024 4:13 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
- The way an implementation understands the TCP ExIDs may benefit
from slightly more explanation:
--
Hi Wes,
Thank you for the review.
The changes to take into account your review can be seen at:
https://github.com/boucadair/ipfix-tcpoptions-and-v6eh/commit/8bd7d7f92180a8eeaeb9ce13c0028a5c698b1738
Please see inline for more context.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Wesley
