Chuck,
thank you very much for the info. This is most useful.
Frank.
From: Chuck Atkins [mailto:chuck.atk...@kitware.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2016 21:28
To: Albina, Frank
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Building ParaView v5.1.2 on Linux from source with
support for GPU and SWR.
b)Use the
Hi Frank,
I tracked down the problem. The way the superbuild was calling ./configure
for mesa was causing the default -O2 flags set by mesa's ./configure to get
dropped, thus resulting in an unoptimized mesa build. I just merged a fix
for both issues into the superbuild.
--
Chuck
>
> which are not copied into the archive when packing the binaries using:
>> “ctest -V -R cpack-paraviewsdk-TGZ”
>>
>
> This should have been fixed a while ago. I'll try to reproduce it and
> make sure the packaging is correct.
>
I see the same problem. I have a fix for the packaging and will
Hi Frank,
> 2. There are still libraries built into /path/to/build/install/lib64.
>
> · projects/apple-unix/szip.cmake
>
> · projects/unix/mesa.common.cmake
>
> · projects/apple-unix/freetye.cmake
>
These should not need to be part of the resulting install and can be
Chuck,
thanks to your help, I could compile ParaView v5.1.2 with Mesa v12.0.3 (release
version, not from GIT repository) using the master git checkout (hash
26eb1fa8f5364242d9f9c03b598f0ee735cf88e4) from last week.
It was not easy but probably due my lack of experience using the superbuild
Hi Chuck,
Thank you very much for your reply. It is very interesting and I will try my
best to get ParaView compiled following your recommendations.
Unfortunately, others duties are holding me off this week from concentrating on
this but I will share my test results comparing ParaView on GPU,
>
> > My intention is to compile paraview without GUI to run it in batch on
> > our cluster. This is the main reason why I am using a specific test
> > suite to check the performance of mesa-llvm vs. mesa-swr vs. GPU. At
> > the moment, on CPUs supporting AVX2 instruction set, mesa-swr shows a
> >
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 17:54:53 +0200, Albina, Frank wrote:
> I had to recompile from scractch, which took a bit of time. Actually,
> the GNU compiler requirement is coming from building the OSPRAY
> project, as shown hereafter:
>
> [...]
> CMake Error at cmake/gcc.cmake:48 (MESSAGE):
> GCC
Ben,
Thank you very much for the information in your email.
>> 3. You need a GNU compiler v4.8.0 or above to build. My Linux
>> distribution comes with gcc v4.7.2. Fortunately, I had gcc v4.9.2
>> installed with which I could perform a successful build.
> What subproject required this?
I
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:06:15 +0200, Albina, Frank wrote:
> In this regard, I would like to point out a few things I have found
> while performing the build process on the aforementioned Linux
> distribution. Note that my incentive is to help improve the ParaView
> software suite as well as
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Albina, Frank <
frank.alb...@sauber-motorsport.com> wrote:
> David,
>
>
>
> I could manage to get Paraview 5.1.2 compiled using the ParaView
> superbuild on my Linux desktop running OpenSuSE 12.3.
>
>
>
> In this regard, I would like to point out a few things I
David,
I could manage to get Paraview 5.1.2 compiled using the ParaView superbuild on
my Linux desktop running OpenSuSE 12.3.
In this regard, I would like to point out a few things I have found while
performing the build process on the aforementioned Linux distribution. Note
that my incentive
Perfect!
Thanks.
Frank.
From: David E DeMarle [mailto:dave.dema...@kitware.com]
Sent: Montag, 26. September 2016 15:49
To: Albina, Frank
Cc: paraview@paraview.org; Del Citto, Francesco
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Building ParaView v5.1.2 on Linux from source with
support for GPU and SWR.
3.3
3.3
David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Albina, Frank <
frank.alb...@sauber-motorsport.com> wrote:
> Hi David!
>
>
>
> Thanks for the swift feedback. As I have been compiling ParaView from
Hi David!
Thanks for the swift feedback. As I have been compiling ParaView from source
for at least the last 6 years, it never came to my mind trying out the
super-build. £
I’ll try it out and report if I find myself stuck.
By the way, which CMake version do you recommend for building
I recommend the ParaView superbuild. All of the incantations that we use to
setup and build paraview, mesa and the rest of our dependencies are written
down and maintained there.
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild
We've used it for our Desktop binaries for years, and more
Dear all,
after having downloaded last week the latest ParaView release (v5.1.2) for
Linux, I have found out that the binary version has the following folder
structure in lib/paraview-5.1:
mesa-llvm
|-- libGL.so -> libGL.so.1
|-- libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.5
|-- libGL.so.1.5
|-- libOSMesa.so ->
17 matches
Mail list logo
