Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.2 Release Candidate 1 available for download

2016-10-13 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 13:57:58 +0300, Gena Bug via ParaView wrote: > I'm slightly confused with background color for the screenshots when > trying to override palette. If I set Background to a Single color in the > Properties tab (gray by default) then nothing can change it -- > background

Re: [Paraview] Multiprocessing doesn't work on windows for pvpython

2016-12-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:23:29 -0500, Luo Han wrote: > I have a script to post processing data. It needs pvpython to call it. The > script import multiprocessing module. But when I import the package, it > shows: Yeah, it isn't a full Python; I had tried stripping it down, but that turns out to

Re: [Paraview] ParaViewConfig.cmake created too late with ENABLE_paraviewpluginsexternal

2017-01-05 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 13:07:32 +0100, Fabian Wein wrote: > I think there is still an issue building plugins via > -DENABLE_paraviewpluginsexternal:BOOL=ON when building > paraview-superbuild. > > cmake ../paraview-superbuild -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release > -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF

Re: [Paraview] Problem reading a numpy NPZ file in ParaView 5.2.0 on Windows

2017-01-06 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 14:36:53 -0500, Cory Quammen wrote: > Thanks for the report. I looked into this and I think I know what is going on. > > In ParaView 5.2.0, we reduced the number of Python modules that > shipped with the ParaView binaries. One of the modules not included > was the

Re: [Paraview] Question on compiling external plugins with 5.2

2017-01-02 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 21:36:51 +0100, Fabian Wein wrote: > Then I do something wrong: > > cmake ../paraview-superbuild -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release > -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF -DENABLE_cxx11=ON -DENABLE_qt5=ON -DENABLE_boost:BOOL=ON > -DENABLE_hdf5:BOOL=ON -DENABLE_zlib:BOOL=ON

Re: [Paraview] Question on compiling external plugins with 5.2

2017-01-02 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 23:48:52 +0100, Fabian Wein wrote: > • enable_paraviewexternalplugins:BOOL=ON: Enables building using external > plugins. Sorry, that should be ENABLE_paraviewexternalplugins. PR pushed: https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/merge_requests/253

Re: [Paraview] git question on paraview-superbuild master

2016-12-23 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 21:10:04 +0100, Fabian Wein wrote: > What is the relationship of paraview-superbuild and common-superbuild? The common superbuild is updated via merge requests in paraview-superbuild; it does not track master automatically. I'll make a merge request here today. You can

Re: [Paraview] Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.

2017-03-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:31:28 -0700, Burlen Loring wrote: > I had to apply to clang-format manually. it's up there now. changes were > minimal so I squashed them into the patch. The fixes would have had to had been squashed in anyways; the robot checks each commit individually. > System has

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 released

2017-03-15 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 17:58:18 -0400, Cory Quammen wrote: > The superbuild was tagged with v5.3.0 this morning. That may be, but it seems you missed pushing it to the main repository :) . --Ben ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware

Re: [Paraview] Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.

2017-03-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:36:10 -0700, Burlen Loring wrote: > fyi, https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/1476 > > it complains about clang-format, but it seems that the source file was > not formatted in that way to begin with. When I enabled clang-format checking, I did

Re: [Paraview] [SuperBuild] Docker ?

2017-04-10 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 16:18:21 +0200, Nabil Ghodbane wrote: > it is not clear to me what you did. Did you build your own docker with > Paraview on top of it and if this is the case could you share the > Dockerfile you implemented to build the docker image? The Dockerfile (and associated files)

Re: [Paraview] [SuperBuild] Docker ?

2017-04-10 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 18:30:11 +0200, Florian Hoffmann wrote: > does anybody out there would like to share some experience with a recent > ParaView Superbuild (>=version 5.2) with *Docker* ? > > - Suggestions/recommendations for existing Dockerfiles ? > > - Suggestions for settings like: Qt

Re: [Paraview] error when building ffmpeg

2017-04-13 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:26:22 -0400, David E DeMarle wrote: > Turn on paraview_FROM_SOURCE_DIR Note that the `master` and `5.3.0` branches now have `paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION` and it should be set to `source`. --Ben ___ Powered by www.kitware.com

Re: [Paraview] paraview-superbuild fails to buiild osmesa

2017-04-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 15:33:30 +0200, Patrick Begou wrote: > This could be solved with disabling swr gallium driver and selecting only > swrast, even if my cpu is from intel family and provides AVX : > > --with-gallium-drivers=swrast You should be able to unset the `mesa_USE_SWR` option (it's

Re: [Paraview] Python not found in paraview-superbuild cmake

2017-04-18 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:57:49 +0200, Patrick Begou wrote: > I've posted this email last week but I did not reveive it via the list. May > be a > mistake of myself. I appologize if some one reveive it twice. > > I'm trying to compile Paraview 5.3 on CentOS6 because I use a modified > OpenMPI

Re: [Paraview] paraview-superbuild hdf5 not found

2017-04-18 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 18:15:00 +0200, Patrick Begou wrote: > Something additionnal to set ? This was fixed in VTK here: https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/commit/641fc17e5e63f7ae5c3654f86a4ac97a33a2c63a HDF5 can be found with targets or with library paths. The VTK module system does not

Re: [Paraview] paraview-superbuild hdf5 not found

2017-04-18 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 13:23:36 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > We can fix this in the superbuild by setting that in `paraview.cmake`. > I'll make that change. https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/merge_requests/308

Re: [Paraview] problem freezing python

2017-04-21 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 14:44:47 -0700, Burlen Loring wrote: > [100%] Freezing Python and ParaView Python packages and modules > Removing > /usr/common/software/ParaView/builds/ParaView-5.3.0/Utilities/PythonInitializer/FrozenPython > Error: could not find python lib directory > Use >

Re: [Paraview] ParaView Web - module twisted.internet error

2017-03-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:01:32 -0300, Rodnei Couto wrote: > Python modules are different from 5.2 to 5.3 > > For example, inside* lib/python2.7/site-packages, *the version 5.2 has the > modules *autobahn, zope and twisted*, and the version 5.3 does not. > > I tried to copy the twisted and zope

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-15 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 17:59:47 +0300, u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr wrote: > I solved the problem and i am able to run the simulation code with > Catalyst support by installing PV (5.4.0 rc4 and 5.3.0) with newer version > of protobuf library (3.3.0) and compiling the model code with this

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 20:45:41 +0300, u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr wrote: > Again thanks for your help. I tried to use protobuf 3.3.0 with PV 5.4.0rc4 > but i am getting following error > > CMake Warning at > >

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 21:44:41 +0300, u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr wrote: > I am trying to install a code with support ParaView, Catalyst (version > 5.3) to a new system. In this case, the code crash (seg. fault) at the > beginning without giving any valuable hint about the problem. If I run

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 16:49:55 +0300, u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr wrote: > Thanks for your help. The server is Scientific Linux release 7.3 > (Nitrogen) and yes i install PV from source using NVIDIA EGL libraries. In > this case, I set USE_X OFF and also QT_GUI OFF. I tried both Intel (2017)

Re: [Paraview] COMPILE AND RUN pvBatch with h5py support errors

2017-07-13 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 14:54:11 +0200, Nabil Ghodbane wrote: > dear experts, > on a CentOS6.8 x86_64 node, I used the Superbuild to compile Paraview > 5.3.0-1 with dev tool 4 (which provides gcc 5.3 ) > > As shown on the attached screen captures, In the CCMAKE configuration, I > enabled Python

Re: [Paraview] pvserver and mpi

2017-07-13 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 19:23:20 +, Scott, W Alan wrote: > I remember a thread from a few weeks ago that the current Linux > distribution has built in MPI. Is this correct? Does this mean a > user can use the Kitware binaries on a cluster, without rebuilding? Theoretically, yes? Though I'd

Re: [Paraview] Paraview segfaults on CentOS 7.2

2017-07-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 14:38:08 -0600, Martin Cuma wrote: > I have been having trouble running the release binary of Paraview on > relatively stock CentOS 7.2 using > the OpenGL. It segfaults before it loads up the GUI window.. If I start > Paraview with the --mesa option, > it works fine. > >

Re: [Paraview] Paraview segfaults on CentOS 7.2

2017-07-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:11:38 -0600, Martin Cuma wrote: > I tried the backtrace but it does not show anything useful since there are > no symbols in the binary. Do you have a binary build that includes symbols > that I could download and try to run? Not on hand, sorry. The backtrace might

Re: [Paraview] Paraview segfaults on CentOS 7.2

2017-07-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 18:57:18 +, Martin Cuma wrote: > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x in ?? () Run `bt` (short for `backtrace`) to get a trace. Though if this frame is `NULL`, I suspect something went really badly somewhere :/ . > So, as you can

Re: [Paraview] Using python IDLE 3.6 with VTK and paraview.simple

2017-07-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 13:03:12 +, Amine Aboufirass wrote: > It appears that the module is defined but it has trouble with some of > the VTK submodules. I tried to import VTK on its own but since the > modules inside make use of the old print statement (no parentheses) > there is not a way to

Re: [Paraview] problem freezing python

2017-04-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:10:36 -0700, Burlen Loring wrote: > That file lives in: lib/python2.7/config/config.c.in OK, it looks like the freeze_paraview.py file can't find it. Could you debug around line 250 to see what it is actually doing? > -set(ENV{PYTHONPATH} "${PACKAGE_ROOT}") >

Re: [Paraview] Color legend not working properly

2017-04-27 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 17:04:24 +, Lawson, Joel M. wrote: > It worked! Thank you very much. > Out of curiousity, what does the --mesa option do? We build Mesa as part of our packages and place the required libraries under `lib/paraview-5.3/mesa`. The `--mesa` flag just adds that directory to

Re: [Paraview] paraview-superbuild fails to buiild osmesa

2017-05-03 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 16:59:18 +0200, Patrick Begou wrote: > Even with v5.3.0-1 the problem remains. It seams related to the OSMESA > config > as a QT4 config on my desktop is successfull (same compilers and OpenMPI > version > but CentOS 6.9 instead of 6.7 on the cluster). > > On the

Re: [Paraview] paraview-superbuild fails to buiild osmesa

2017-05-03 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:55:15 +0200, Patrick Begou wrote: > My git commit is: > > commit 8c380916ea13198b8912bef78971a71bba6d7147 > Merge: e75a492 84ebd63 > Author: Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> > Date: Tue May 2 12:33:58 2017 + Are you building

Re: [Paraview] pvpython vtkMPIController usage? rank is always 0

2017-05-16 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 19:07:14 +0200, Ephraim Obermaier wrote: > $ mpirun -n 2 pvpython test.py I believe you want to use pvbatch for MPI-enabled Python scripts. --Ben ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

Re: [Paraview] Paraview 5.4.1 FTBS on Debian/Testing with gcc 7.2 when -DPARAVIEW_USE_VISITBRIDGE=ON

2017-10-12 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:41:46 +0200, Christophe Trophime wrote: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtWidgets -isystem > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtGui -isystem > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore -isystem > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -g -O2 >

Re: [Paraview] Paraview 5.4.1 FTBS on Debian/Testing with gcc 7.2 when -DPARAVIEW_USE_VISITBRIDGE=ON

2017-10-12 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:39:29 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Hmm, my browser history says I searched for this back in July… looking > around there finds: > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17456 > > which seems to have dropped off our radar. Is the V

Re: [Paraview] OpenGL inside VMWare virtual machine

2017-11-16 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:40:43 -0500, Ken Martin wrote: > Basically there is a bug in Qt on windows where it refuses to see the 3.2 > context from Mesa because it is not a compatibility context. On startup, Qt makes a context without a profile. Mesa gives it the best compatibility profile it

Re: [Paraview] pvbatch

2017-11-13 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 22:42:29 +, Scott, W Alan wrote: > What are the magic cmake switches, for superbuild, that are used to > build a non MPI, Mesa version of pvbatch? Where is this documented? pvpython is the non-MPI version of pvbatch. The superbuild docs could probably be improved

Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: pvbatch

2017-11-15 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 22:04:19 +, Scott, W Alan wrote: > I believe this is a change from the past. Here is what I desire – how > do I get it? > > I want to run pv(pythonScript). I want it to produce output. I want > it to run off screen, not showing on the console display or current >

Re: [Paraview] No module named paraview.simple on MacOs sierra

2017-11-03 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 19:49:26 +, the lily wrote: > export PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:/Applications/ParaView-5.4.1.app/Contents/bin The modules should be in /path/to/.app/Contents/Python. Try: export PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:/Applications/ParaView-5.4.1.app/Contents/Python --Ben

Re: [Paraview] cygwin installation

2017-12-05 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:20:50 +1300, Zohar Levi via ParaView wrote: > To be more specific, I'm building paraview 5.4.1 (gcc on cygwin), and I > get the following errors: > > $ make > [� 0%] Built target vtkWrappingTools > [� 0%] Built target vtkWrapHierarchy > [� 0%] Building CXX object >

Re: [Paraview] superbuild: fontconfig too old to compile (current does)

2017-10-30 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 20:10:26 +0100, Fabian Wein wrote: > I could not find the build error in the link. > > The earliest version that builds for my gcc 7.2.1 is > fontconfig-2.12.4, maybe this is a „compromise“? Ah, sorry, I forgot to report back here. The issue is fixed on master. It

Re: [Paraview] superbuild: fontconfig too old to compile (current does)

2017-10-25 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 13:35:51 +0200, Fabian Wein wrote: > thank you! So the current master will have the upgrade within a few days? Hopefully. I need to get `gperf` onto the build machine since it is a new build dependency of fontconfig. --Ben ___

Re: [Paraview] superbuild: fontconfig too old to compile (current does)

2017-10-25 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 13:35:51 +0200, Fabian Wein wrote: > thank you! So the current master will have the upgrade within a few days? It's not so simple :( . There's a build failure with older compilers: https://open.cdash.org/viewNotes.php?buildid=5114526 --Ben

Re: [Paraview] superbuild: fontconfig too old to compile (current does)

2017-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 16:51:09 +0200, Fabian Wein wrote: > fontconfig 2.12.1 does not compile with the error at the end of this > mail. > > Building the current fontconfig 2.12.6 works for me, maybe the version > could be upgraded? I've pushed an MR for the common-superbuild here:

Re: [Paraview] Problem compiling ParaView with NMake

2017-10-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:40:34 -0400, Cory Quammen wrote: > I strongly recommend using the Ninja generator for building ParaView with > Superbuild on Windows. It will build much faster than if you use other > build generators, and will take care of the particular problem you are > seeing as -j

Re: [Paraview] python mismatch with superbuild on os x

2018-01-29 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:40:40 +0100, Nicolas Vuaille wrote: > I don't know if there is a proper fix but there is a CMake option to bypass > this check: > set PYTHON_I_KNOW_WHAT_IM_DOING to true may solve the problem. Indeed, this is the workaround. The problem is that we've had folks with

Re: [Paraview] paraview-superbuild Qt5 not found

2018-02-08 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 15:46:27 +, Hermitte Luc (CS SI) wrote: > I'm calling cmake with the following options?: > cmake -Dqt5_enabled=On -DUSE_SYSTEM_qt5=On(/Off) > -DQt5_DIR=/path/to/qt/5.9.1/lib/cmake/Qt5 .. The input setting is `ENABLE_qt5`. The `qt5_enabled` variable indicates

Re: [Paraview] Python shell, os.environ

2017-12-21 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 22:50:50 +, Heiland, Randy wrote: > Ah, I see ‘os’ has been hijacked by PV. But something like this seems > to accomplish what I want, maybe… > > Create a new module for PV: > > /Applications/ParaView-5.4.1.app/Contents/Python$ more envs.py > import os >

Re: [Paraview] Parview Build Faulure on Mac OS 10.12.6

2017-12-22 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 23:37:55 +, Beach, Timothy A. (GRC-LTE0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] wrote: > Helo, I’ve been working through some issues compiling on a new MAC > but this one has me stuck. I used CMAKE 3.10 to generate xcodebuild > files for paraview 5.4. Any ideas? Yep, Working on a

Re: [Paraview] Python shell, os.environ

2017-12-21 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 15:14:01 +, Heiland, Randy wrote: > Thanks Ben. You’re right, of course. Moreover, my idea for having > (non-admin) users install additional Python modules (e.g., scipy) into > PV’s dir, is a not going to go well. Well, if `sys.path` or `PYTHONPATH` can be pointed to

<    1   2