Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to start a merging work of Debian fixes (there're some
that are very interesting to have in). What's the idea regarting 1.8
branch? Will we release a 1.8.1 or even 1.9 before 2.0?
IMHO we should have those releases in between as well. We
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please find attached the 'diff -urNp' against the current SVN trunk.
This patch is meant to address the following:
a. libparted/filesys.c, ped_file_system_type_unregister: Handle
instances where
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a. libparted/filesys.c, ped_file_system_type_unregister: Handle
instances where fs_types == NULL and the given fs_type is not in the
list of registered file-system types. Some code clean-up.
b. libparted/disk.c, ped_register_disk_type,
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, those files will be present on the tarball but not on SCM.
In that case, fine by me.
I'll wait for one more OK to push it.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
I implemented the support to print the backtrace when throwing an
exception. It can probably be improved but it works fine here.
What do you think about merging it on 1.8?
I'd like this support in 1.8. Might
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:26:48AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Checking what there's available for C I found Check[1][2]. It looks
interesting for me.
1. http://check.sourceforge.net/ 2.
GNU fdisk already uses check for its unit tests. Have a look at it.
Oh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:54:39PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
If we choose to use git, I can do the migration on monday.
Does anyone object to replacing darcs by git? If no one does,
I would like to accept your offer.
Ok. I'll do it tomorrow. Alioth supports
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello David,
as promised some information on the plans for GNU Parted 2.0.
[SNIP]
PARTED:
---
Task #1 (bundle):
=
* parted -l (direct interface to print all command)
I have implemented this feature. However I
debian/changelog |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 6c80bf113026d43b1a4b9480d0cc76eb615f02a3
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Nov 26 22:45:08 2006 -0200
debian/changelog: annotate the disbleness of kfreebsd patch
doc/mdate-sh| 97 -
doc/texinfo.tex | 6200 ---
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6297 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 200930aa6757b01484ce9a1679e1beb0263c3275
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Nov 26 22:47:11 2006
doc/mdate-sh| 97 -
doc/texinfo.tex | 6200 ---
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6297 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit fe82ffd5d1f8f7f812fdc2115e692e95ec9ec56e
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Nov 26 22:47:11 2006
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My understanding of Debian's packaging system is that everything is
put in a debian/ subdirectory in the project source tree. A single
diff is generated which contains the contents of the debian/
subdirectory. I find patches in this directory and
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@@ -1999,7 +1999,7 @@ _(Without arguments, print displays the
argument, information about free space will be displayed otherwise if a\n
partition number is given, then more detailed information is displayed\n
about that partition. If the 'all'
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* warn before mklabel
Erasing a partition table is dangerous, the user should be warned and
asked for confirmation.
Should not mkfs also have a similar warning?
Yes, it should.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
parted/parted.c | 44
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 9fe3e315603f469f86234602f65e2e397950e486
Author: Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Nov 29 03:43:05 2006 +0530
Warn before mklabel and mkfs.
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/control.in |2 +-
debian/rules |6 --
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit da577e8a80e2458759bc090387dd88b408a5c89c
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Nov 28 17:22:54 2006 -0200
configure.ac |2 +-
libparted/arch/linux.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit ad358e802bc539e49608e05badd257a1ff6d3658
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Nov 28 17:36:03 2006 -0200
libparted/arch/linux.c
:
commit 3e9d85b11ec9705eb051e274792239f59d9687e9
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Nov 28 20:13:23 2006 -0200
Readd part of lvm2.dpatch
Current device mapper code isn't probing the LVM partitions and Debian
Installer needs it
commit
configure.ac |2 +-
libparted/arch/linux.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 1dc978b56644a2ac54bab87b29aee04f72c6bd65
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Nov 28 17:36:03 2006 -0200
libparted/arch/linux.c
Hello,
While porting the need modules of Debian Intaller to parted 1.8 I
found a missing feature on libdevmapper support.
I'm attaching the current patch that we're using that's based on our
previous lvm2 support patch. It probably isn't the best way to get it
done but it works.
index
commits:
commit 517bc37a34042ebc0423af914aadbbf9a08e1960
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Nov 28 22:29:53 2006 -0200
Remove parted-print-name.dpatch since it was merge upstream
commit a7cb8eca8b5d14c6cb5c363e10c682eb3ee8c861
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue
parted/parted.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d6dda771b80bb99a88c636056393420202488a47
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Nov 28 22:26:50 2006 -0200
Proper print when there're no extended partitions, but partition
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's a change that probably won't make 1.8.x because it'll probably
change too much code but if it proves stable we can rethink it.
However it is still a trivial change after all.
Indeed. Please provide the patch and then we see what we do ;-)
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Strangely the 'print free' command does not seem to work as it is
supposed to. The output is identical to the one given by 'print'. The
reason for this seems to be the fact that there is simply no code to
show the free space in 'do_print' in
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you provide an example output and point what's the problem on it?
The following session with the Parted sources from the Git tree can be
taken as an example. I have also added the output of 'df' to point the
amount of usage on each
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could we please also do something with the names of these warn functions
as well? Currently I think the names are not obvious, for instance
Yes, that is true. In some places in libparted the naming of the
functions are not uniform. eg.,
):
| Updated translations.
|
| Otavio Salvador (13):
| Rework backtrace support
| Remove useless semicolon from PED_ASSERT calls
| Remove useless 'return 0;' call
| Change version to 1.8.1
| Readd the 'return 0;' to please GCC
| parted/parted.c: Remove
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've released parted-1.8.1 now. Here are some changes I made:
- Leslie, your disable ext2fs resize patch lacked braces around the if
block. Added those.
- Otavio, I added an --enable-selinux configure option to enable
linking with libselinux and
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I *never* could find anything in the git documentation to explicitly
check out a tag. The only documentation I can find explains how to tag,
but not check out a specific tag.
How do you do this?
If you use cogito (which I highly recommend), you
Stefan Scheler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello list,
can we add some basic LUKS [1] support (see attached file) to parted?
It's currently probing only but that's nevertheless a useful feature.
Thanks in advance.
It looks great to me. Could you please make it against our GIT
repository? So
and then fix it later. I'm still lacking
an idea how to reproduce it using our C library but I'll try to make
it. Any comment is welcome on it too.
Please review the patch, comment and send suggestions. PLEASE, DO NOT
COMMIT IT YET.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: [EMAIL
Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have forked a bleeding-edge development version of GNU Parted
from 1.8rc2-something. The repository is in Darcs form with all
the history preserved. You can check it out, provided you have a
working installation of
commits:
commit fe914828d2b36451a7056292560820633c891afe
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Dec 5 14:12:24 2006 -0200
parted/parted.c: Remove useless line break
commit ba43cb6ff7bb1d945062e25b94efecb1b84c0c33
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Dec 4 23:40
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
commit ba43cb6ff7bb1d945062e25b94efecb1b84c0c33
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Dec 4 23:40:54 2006 -0200
Add check unittest support and a initial test for a resizing bug.
Folks, I'm sorry. I commited it by mistake. I'll
0f1ba3f5d9d57f3a2205ec67738f611cf5b22e7d
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Dec 5 14:16:04 2006 -0200
Revert Add check unittest support and a initial test for a resizing bug.
This code wasn't ready for commit yet.
This reverts commit ba43cb6ff7bb1d945062e25b94efecb1b84c0c33
parted/parted.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit bba602738804241613ea21cd48899beab78d3ab8
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Dec 5 14:12:24 2006 -0200
parted/parted.c: Remove useless line break
libparted/disk.c | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit a9fea1add642a8f1243932a4db2ee967ad668a4b
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Dec 5 15:32:26 2006 -0200
libparted/disk.c: Standarize the way we walk throught
libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c |4 ++--
parted/parted.c |8
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit e4777a8008ef2689451c3e6cd07bd041e6f14f8c
Author: Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 00:00:04 2006 +0100
Add a
85bc153aadbe836f6459acc205284735638a13a4
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Dec 5 14:12:24 2006 -0200
parted/parted.c: Remove useless line break
commit 759160902988778d55f59ae42f7bed116e531fb0
Author: David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Dec 3 22:21:12 2006 -0500
Hello folks,
Today I managed to get a test of Parted on s390 (using hercules) and
it fails to reconize the disk label.
I checked previous version of code that was being in use on Debian for
1.7.1 and that works fine against our current version on 1.8.1 and
most of code is similar.
Looks like
, 2320 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c75b3e81168edc42879131b9d90da6661a9c3b22
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 00:20:47 2006 -0200
Readd s390 patch and revert DASD support to our previous and stable version;
commit
Sadrul H Chowdhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12/5/06, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Today I managed to get a test of Parted on s390 (using hercules)
and
it fails to reconize the disk label.
I notice the same problem with ext2, ext3
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello folks,
Today I managed to get a test of Parted on s390 (using hercules) and
it fails to reconize the disk label.
I checked previous version of code that was being in use on Debian for
1.7.1 and that works fine against
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please, hold this decision...
Looks like we're basically producing a already ready for use
solution. Why we don't just use Trac for all of this?
Trac is yummy, but it supports only SVN inbuilt AFAIK. So basically
we'll only be using its bug and
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My personal suggestion is that we should be looking for a solution
outside of any company or distribution to centralize all of the things
we need:
- source repo in git
- mailing lists
- web site
- download location
Tarballs
parted/parted.c | 64 ---
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 13c28f379c46d983e7005808261119c188b9c8a0
Author: Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Dec 7 07:31:39 2006 +0530
Implement 'print
parted/parted.c | 64 ---
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 38d2355c2d2550aa0e70a2c8d7df49e8286f7d49
Author: Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Dec 7 07:31:39 2006 +0530
Implement 'print
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please find attached a patch to implement the 'print devices' command.
It is meant to display all the active block devices, similar to the
way GParted does it.
The function ped_unit_format_byte has a problem which causes it to
format a device of zero
parted/ui.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit b8903b3f54151437a2fff93399ca50b01abd4184
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 22:44:40 2006 -0200
Output a backtrace when catching SEGV_MAPERR or a general SIGSEGV
parted/ui.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 14ff7f8e10ea3034f35c96ec9050561697204f3a
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 22:44:40 2006 -0200
Output a backtrace when catching SEGV_MAPERR or a general SIGSEGV
libparted/exception.c | 23 ---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 53195acd3d8ce1af9188a68a179955cf8e35a938
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 23:33:52 2006 -0200
libparted/exception.c: Dynamically allow space
Kristoffer Ericson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings,
I filed a bugreport at
http://viridian.homeunix.net/flyspray/?do=detailsid=7
Hello Kristoffer. I sent some details and a possible fix for your
problem that I would like that you make a test. Check the ticket for
detail.
--
O
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:09:32AM +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
I have edited the 'help print' output too, and hav tried to arrange
the arguments in an alphabetical manner. However since the 'print'
command is getting more and more new arguments, would not it be a
} files to host them and wrote the label.c file to
use the most interesting features of CHECK framework.
Please review this patchset and comment.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
From: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
libparted/Makefile.am |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libparted/Makefile.am b/libparted/Makefile.am
index 0cb7c09..b071658 100644
--- a/libparted/Makefile.am
+++ b/libparted/Makefile.am
@@ -3,7 +3,13
From: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
configure.ac |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 8200564..5dc4ebc 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -432,6 +432,10 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADER([execinfo.h
From: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
libparted/tests/Makefile.am | 11
libparted/tests/common.c| 22
libparted/tests/common.h|6
libparted/tests/label.c | 61 +++
4 files changed, 100 insertions
libparted/unit.c | 20 +++-
parted/parted.c | 12 +++-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 4005d75a05b7d043c285479f73fbb9cecfd92b70
Author: Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Dec 8 00:51:06 2006 +0530
Zero sized device
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:00:52PM +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Should I provide all the changes as a single patch against the master
branch?
Please post a patch against master and, if they differ, stable for review.
But would be good if the patches could be splited
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trac is a good way to keep things in one place. We keep the releases and
website at gnu.org; while we let Trac handle the Wiki, Bug tracker. We
can link the existing repository from Trac (like Otavio mentioned, it
has a plugin for Git)
I'm not
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to make my changes to the linux-swap code of libparted
public. However since I myself think, and some of you said so also,
the changes are not suitable to be merged into the next 1.8.x release,
what should I do?
Should I provide all the
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Is a wiki _that_ useful to the project? Is there something the wiki
can provide that we can't get from the web site and mailing lists? Too
many stimuli mean the project quickly gets
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if we really need this, and whether a shell-based interface
wouldn't be easier _and_ appeal to a larger audience.
pyparted is in use by every distribution that uses anaconda (that
includes Fedora, RHEL, CentOS, Yellowdog, rPath, and the list
rohit hooda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding the VFS layer...if we write it to where
new filesystems can be
easily added, we can then pick and choose which ones
we want to use
external libraries for and which ones we just keep
our code for.
I would like to work on this ... i.e. for
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was also thinking about having multiple language bindings to
libparted. My thinking was triggered by the libparted++ project
[1][2]. Since Python is a language I have started using from a few
months back, I am also interested in the Python bindings
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Iff it doesn't use that kinda of framework I'm not favoured to merge
it.
I differ on that opinion. libparted is a system-level library and does
not deserve to use SWIG at all. The only real way to write python
bindings for something like libparted
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a patch to deprecate ped_[register|unregister]_disk_type in
favour of ped_disk_type_[register|unregister]. I did this since almost
all the functions in libparted have ped_filename as a prefix, which
was not the case here.
The older functions
___
parted-devel mailing list
parted-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
___
parted-devel mailing list
parted-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 23:33:52 2006 -0200
libparted/exception.c: Dynamically allow space of exception message.
commit 14ff7f8e10ea3034f35c96ec9050561697204f3a
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 6 22:44:40 2006 -0200
Output
scripts/release/tarball_upload.sh |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c6df442f83ceaeeddf0121a28a3c9bd3b91c666d
Author: Leslie P. Polzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Dec 9 10:51:43 2006 +0100
Release script: cannot call return from top level;
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is the patch.
Any outstanding issues with this one?
I think it's ok.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
+++
6 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 6928477436823359850941fabd78444635752095
Author: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Dec 11 07:46:34 2006 -0200
Include a disk probing test
commit c95d7f912f577c6188c4900826f50ddd54505b4e
Author: Otavio
parted/parted.c | 52 ++--
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit b9fadd12d1a6c0a853f999398ed5d689fd7d9106
Author: Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Dec 9 01:11:49 2006 +0530
Alias 'print list' with
Hello David,
Please, once you have time please push the v1.8.1 tag to our git
repository since it's missing...
Thanks a lot
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 02:58:15PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I personally like how the kernel folks does it. They use a definition
to add an attribute that raise a warning on compile time. For example:
#define __deprecated __attribute__((deprecated))
So you
Kristoffer Ericson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings,
is svn://svn.debian.org/parted/upstream/;module=trunk correct?
No.
git://git.debian.org/git/parted/parted.git
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello folks, and esp. Otavio,
the __deprecated method to mark deprecation is good, but I fear it
won't suffice for the partition guessing stuff (and everywhere else
where signatures or semantics of functions have changed without changing
the name).
But then this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
probe function. 2.0 will presumably return an integer between 0 and
100. When using a macro, we can have flexible semantics for legacy
apps and new semantics for upgraded apps.
Why do you wish to change that?
This shall not be the discussion in this mail, but:
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm starting to think that we're probably needing a 1.9.0 development
release to make it available for more people to test. What others
think about it?
I think most of the features planned for 2.0 should be in place in
some form or the other in 1.9.x
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Straightforward code modifications. These changes look good to me,
but I agree with Otavio that's in edge material rather than 1.8.x
material.
Yes, would be better if it had been done as a patchset so some of
them, the code cleanups, could be merge on
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anant Narayanan wrote:
Instead of removing it we could make it optional. That would give us
the best of both worlds ;-)
Perfect :)
David; I think making po4a optional instead of removing it looks like
the best way to go.
OK, how about a
Hello,
I would like to discuss a proposal for Parted 2.0. I think we should
rewrite the Parted UI application.
Current code has a lot of problems and should be refactored but while
I was looking at it and talking to David on IRC we thought that could
be better to rewrite it.
The idea is:
-
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to discuss a proposal for Parted 2.0. I think we should
rewrite the Parted UI application.
Current code has a lot of problems and should be refactored but while
I was looking at it and talking to David on IRC we thought that could
be
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to be clear... I'd prefer this parted-ng directory to be inside
the master branch checkout. Not another branch. So you'd check out
the master branch code and see these directories inside the project:
parted/
parted-ng/
Sadrul H Chowdhury [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. I would like to re-suggest libgnt for this (re:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2006-December/000565.html
and
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2006-December/000775.html
).
Since
configure.ac |1 +
libparted/arch/gnu.c |4 +---
libparted/arch/linux.c |6 +-
libparted/device.c |4 +---
libparted/labels/fdasd.c |2 --
parted/table.c | 40 ++--
parted/table.h |4 +---
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a start.
Favoring the lighter-weight FILE* output function is not a big deal,
but does tend to make the code smaller and a little more robust.
BTW, I noticed some inconsistency in spacing before function-call
open parentheses, e.g.
printf (
doc/C/Makefile.am |2 ++
doc/po4a.mk |2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit f757156d846c70a88b90ab3ff47ff385ed136a56
Author: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Feb 14 12:37:45 2007 +0100
Make it so make distcheck passes.
*
parted/ui.c | 96 ++-
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 3965965b3413df11d6306704478490f6e5b72549
Author: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Feb 13 22:51:56 2007 +0100
Use lighter-weight
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a patch to replace ped_[register|unregister]_disk_type with
ped_disk_type_[register|unregister], and deprecate the former. I have
used the __attribute__ ((deprecated)) technique to do this.
What do you think?
I didn't find the prototype tagged
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which is the best way to reverse the effect of:
$ ./autogen.sh ./configure make
I have tried:
$ make distclean
but a few of the generated files still remain.
git clean -d
;-)
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I'm preparing a patch that makes the build warning free,
and found some unused functions in libparted/labels/fdasd.c.
Here they are:
(fdasd_partition_type):
(fdasd_write_vtoc_labels):
(fdasd_change_volser):
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 15:28 +0100, May DouĊĦak wrote:
Hi there,
I have 120gigs HDD with vista NTFS partition that starts at 40gigs.
I'd like to move that partition to beginning of hard drive and
expand it all over disk. Expanding (to right) works in
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is no dissenting voice then I will make the changes in favour
of (a) tomorrow.
go!
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058
Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
struct foo {
int ...
struct bar {
int ...
}
};
This has led to two completely different ways of defining such complex
data-types, in turn affecting the style and readability of the code.
Which one is preferred?
David Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems like I could spend some time reviewing the code base and filling
out doxygen blurbs. Good idea? Got any guidelines or special
requests?
Perfect.
No special requests. Just prepare the patch and send it here for review.
--
O T A
debug/clearfat/clearfat.c|6 ++
libparted/arch/linux.c | 42
libparted/cs/constraint.c|3 -
libparted/cs/geom.c |3 -
libparted/debug.c|6 +-
libparted/disk.c |5 --
libparted/filesys.c
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My gnulib-based (in-progress) changes also automatically adds files
to m4/, and gnulib-tool provides a way to remove such directories.
Adding this line to Makefile.am should do the trick:
MOSTLYCLEANDIRS
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Update regression tests.
Isn't this more something that'd be done mainly during development?
Otherwise, (doing it at release time) it's too easy to introduce tests
that are not as portable as they should be.
Yes. You're right.
* Run regression
1 - 100 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
