I don't know much about Sunpak but perhaps yours wasn't designed for Pentax.
Even the most complicated Pentax cameras have 4 contacts only.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I have an old model camera, Pentax SF10 w/Sunpak auto 266 D thyristor
flash. Now whether that means anything to
Sylwester wrote: Taht's just another proof how stupid some tests could
be... I just remember, that in CF tests, older kit lens - FA
28-80/3.5-5.6 was better than not only FA 28-70/4 AL, but even it proved
to be better than FA* 28-70/2.8...
Maybe the magazine has to be read and judged with a
Fra: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dag, we've used Access too for various applications over the years,
including an Access 2 program that currently runs in 38 hospitals in our
state, and an Access 95 (became 97) program that manages the maintenance of
our city council's mobile phones and
On 10/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Pretty funny link, mac users with bandwidth to spare will especially
enjoy it. bg
http://www.waveworks.net/mac.html
This one wouldn't even complete loading unless I downloaded Macromedial
Flash 6 player.
That sort of coercion I can do without! So I
G'day All.
The missus is mad keen on decorating the house with bloody christmas
lights again this year.
Seeing as how I am the poor mug that has to get on the roof and do all
the fitting of the things,
I was thinking of getting some photos of the lights at just on dark.
Can anyone suggest what
What, in the opinion of the list, is:
A/ too much
B/ just right
C/ a bargain
in any currency you like for the Pentax SMC K 50mm f/1.2 ???
Many thanks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 11/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'm new to the group and have a question. I noticed in the gallery this
coming month's gallery theme is Professional. What is the criteria for
Professional? Is this in regards to professional photography, photographs
of a profession or speaks of a
Hi,
Cotty wrote (in respect of the reigning high submitter to PUG):
Pugzilla?
Pugeroy?
Pugenon?
Pugicist?
PUG*ist???
Pugtan (male)
Pugtana (female)
mike
Hi Arnlod.
It seems that my reply to your message got lost. So I am trying once
more sigh.
- The prices given by the magazine are the prices on the German market.
I stand corrected. I suppose it is uncustomary for German magazine to
publish prices outside Germany. Well, my bad.
- The ratings
Hi all,
could we all please check that the contents of our mails match the subject
heading. Sorry to mingle in this, but it is annoying finding message after
message not covering the subject heading.
:-)
Paul Delcour
For Pentax AF cameras, you might want to stick with these flashes. There are
a couple of these on eBay now so you might wish to check them out.
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/flashes/AF/index.html
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I will look around and see what other flash types there are
Hi,
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 8:30:02 AM, you wrote:
What, in the opinion of the list, is:
A/ too much
B/ just right
C/ a bargain
in any currency you like for the Pentax SMC K 50mm f/1.2 ???
in HM's pounds here in Olde London Towne they are normally priced
around the £250- mark
I'd say the absolute maximum is US$300 for the K, significantly more for the
A. But I don't really know the market price for this lens that well. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
What, in the opinion of the list, is:
A/ too much
B/ just right
C/ a bargain
in any currency you like
Fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Charlton Vaughan
I'm new to the group and have a question. I noticed in the gallery this
coming month's gallery theme is Professional. What is the criteria for
Professional? Is this in regards to professional
Andre Langevin schrieb:
What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter +
winding (compared to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a
reference)?
Hello Andre!
That's not an easy question!
I would not only take the absolute noise level into account but also the
pitch of
On 11/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
What, in the opinion of the list, is:
A/ too much
B/ just right
C/ a bargain
in any currency you like for the Pentax SMC K 50mm f/1.2 ???
in HM's pounds here in Olde London Towne they are normally priced
around the £250- mark for good examples.
Hi all,
this is from Paul Fox who had an excellent response. He may join us, but for
the moment couldn't work out how to join. I showed him the way...
:-)
Paul Delcour
From Paul Fox:
I just found the thread on pentax discission forum but I don't know to
reply..
Anyway :
I have made my
Hi,
Andre wrote:
What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter + winding (compared
to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a reference)?
Can't compare them to the references, as I don't have either but,
compared to each other, I would say that the MZ-S is quieter.
Ah Fred,
that reminds me that the min. focus disctance at 1.7m makes the lens partly
useless. I often get much closer than that. Can any zoom handle that better?
It's primes for now then.
:-)
Paul Delcour
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003
If people look at me and say, but you're a professional conductor, they mean
that word implies I know it all, or at least a lot. I don't of course. The
word just means I conduct for a living, no matter how good ar bad: that has
nothing to do with it. Amateurs can be better at things than many a
There's one on ebay.de
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2950656543category=12877
Wow!
:-)
Paul Delcour
Hi,
Early versions of this flash do not swivel 270degrees, as later models
do. The head only turns 90degrees each way from straight ahead. This
is how to modify it to get more turn.
CAVEAT: I AM NOT RECOMMENDING ANYONE TO DO THIS WORK. I AM ONLY
EXPLAINING HOW I DID IT.
The stops for the
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Paul Delcour wrote:
There's one on ebay.de
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2950656543category=12877
Wow!
The collest thing about these extreme tele lenses is the focusing scale.
While more normal lenses have 15 meters as the last mark before infinity,
Hi All
In one of his books Galen Rowell said that 60% of his best images were made
with either a 20mm or a 180mm.
of the remaining 40%, 60% were with a 35mm or 85mm.[This is all pre-zoom]
OK these are Nikon focal lenghts but its an interesting
exercise..especialy
DougF,
I don't know which version of Access you have been exposed to, but
from what you say, I think you have run way over to the far side.
Access97 is pretty stable in a single user environment, but not for
shared applications. Access2000 is a _lot_ better in this respect.
Take the AutoPug as
Christian,
That's a good one.
I ran into a similar problem with the old IR remote
sender/receiver, which
is a two-component story with a handheld IR flash, and a receiver
that
sits on the hotshoe and triggers the camera by cable release. It
was
designed for the original 645 and contemporaries
On 10 Sep 2003 at 9:12, Doug Franklin wrote:
Maybe I'm biased, in part, by the types of apps that I've worked
on with
databases in general and Access in particular. To me, you don't
go from
small to medium sized until you're talking about 100k records or
so.
Large doesn't start until
It appears to be the poor man's house, hence 8mm required.
Guess at a 1 or 2DK.
OPeter
On 10 Sep 2003 at 14:30, Alan Abbott wrote:
Anyone any experience with MySQL?
We use MySQL for a project at work.
It has proven to be very stable. It was simple to install,
and has required no particular maintenance at all.
Don't know much about APIs available. The front-end we have is web
Charlton,
may I ask whether this happens with all lenses you use? It could be that your
lens is defective. Remember, we are talking TTL flash here and whether or not
the flash is triggered (and with what 'strength') is determined by the camera
during exposure. In other words, the camera checks
On 9 Sep 2003 at 22:00, Cotty wrote:
'Noting that a pretty young woman called Siobhan in Ireland is
building
G5 Macs,...'
How 'bout a PDML-meet in Ireland? :-)
Jostein
--
Photos at: http://www.oksne.net
--
.
These danged Aussies is taking over the list!
Welcome, Trevor. Beware enablement..
-Lon
John Coyle wrote:
G'day Trev! Welcome to the list, and if you're ever coming to BrisVegas give
me a bell!
YES, I'M GUILTY...
...of breaking two rules at a time here,
but it's not me selling the item.
And who of you has actually ever seen such a monster?
Not me!
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2950656543category=12877
:-)
Thomas
Yup. Too far left focuses grain.
Herb Chong wrote:
one thing i have discovered in my experimentation. the leftmost position is
not usually the position with minimum effect. start at the leftmost setting
of deblur and move the slider to the right one click at a time. you will see
that there are
Hi,
now there's only missing the F/FA 135/2.8[IF] in his comparison!
What do we know about it?
All the best
Thomas
Hi all,
this is from Paul Fox who had an excellent response. He may join us, but for
the moment couldn't work out how to join. I showed him the way...
:-)
Paul Delcour
Trevor wrote:
TB I figured that if I left the MZ60 on smiley green and mounted on a
TB tripod,
TB The pentax would work out it's own settings.
TB Is this correct?
Not necessarily, Trevor. Too much light and the meter might
underexpose. In normal illumination, with shaded areas prevailing,
Another vote for FileMaker. Easiest to program that I ever saw.
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 10.09.03 5:54, Doug Franklin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is, avoid it at all costs. Are you using OSX? If so, there are
tons of open source databases out there, and almost any of them will
beat
Paul Eriksson wrote:
If we're not talking about the *ist D then it would be
FA 24mm f/2.0
FA 35mm f/2.0
FA 100mm macro f/2.8
FA 80-200mm f/2.8 or FA 200mm f/2.
If you can stand 1 stop slower for the first three,
substitute:
K 24mm f/2.8
M 35mm f/f.8
M 100mm macro f/4
And if you want a 200mm
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, keller.schaefer wrote:
may I ask whether this happens with all lenses you use? It could be that your
lens is defective. Remember, we are talking TTL flash here and whether or not
the flash is triggered (and with what 'strength') is determined by the camera
during
Mark, you may want to avoid thumbnails in the database if you're
talking huge amounts of pictures. If the database provides
a picture name that you can find quickly with a decent picture
browser and an organized series of picture folders, you'll probably
be able to ZIP or RAR your database to a
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Paul Delcour wrote:
that reminds me that the min. focus disctance at 1.7m makes the lens partly
useless. I often get much closer than that. Can any zoom handle that better?
The FA28-80/3.5-5.6, 0.5m across the zoom range. The FA50/1.7 is
0.45m, for comparison.
OK, not
Hi!
And if you want a 200mm prime instead of the 4th:
M 200mm f/4
Lon, mind if I ask you (and other wizards) about this very lens. Is it
heavy? How's it optically? Is there A version?
Boris
Musical type conductor? If so, where.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Paul Delcour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Users Gallery - theme: professional
If people look at me and say, but you're a professional
I just pulled my Sunpak out, and lo, tis the auto 266D.
There's a switch labled OT and PT. Must be set to PT
(meaning Pentax, not Olympus). Does analog TTL or thyristor
on one of two f-stops (2.8 or 5.6 when at ISO 100). Tilt,
no swivel, on full manual it cannot do fractions of full flash.
Oh bugger,
I have just discovered that my Cokin P-series polariser vignettes on the
55mm f/4 for the 6x7 :-( This is using a cut-down holder (*).
I am most dischuffed about this 'cos the same setup doesn't vignette
with grad NDs on the 55mm or with anything on the 24mm f/2.8 for 35mm. So
my
No wizard, me. But I do own one. The M-200 f/4 is smallish,
52mm thread, built-in hood. I like mine a lot, although scans
often show slight chromatic problems (yellowish fringe on one
side of an object, bluish on the other). I assume, therefore,
no APO elements were used to construct it. The
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:39:12 +0200, Jostein wrote:
DougF,
I don't know which version of Access you have been exposed to, but
from what you say, I think you have run way over to the far side.
You're right. I was forced, against my will, judgement, and advice, to
implement serious, large
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If an item has a reserve on it, I usually don't bid.
I find this kind of weird. Whether or not an item has a reserve has no
effect at all on whether I bid or how much. eBay doesn't charge me
anything for bidding! I wait until the last moment and bid the
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, you may want to avoid thumbnails in the database if you're
talking huge amounts of pictures. If the database provides
a picture name that you can find quickly with a decent picture
browser and an organized series of picture folders, you'll probably
John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dag, we've used Access too for various applications over the years,
including an Access 2 program that currently runs in 38 hospitals in our
state, and an Access 95 (became 97) program that manages the maintenance of
our city council's mobile phones and radios
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My family is from the area between Seneca and Cayuga lakes. Heaven. Go there
in mid-October...
I *will* be in that area in mid-October, actually! Going up to Rochester
for a 10-mile race but plan on getting in a couple of extra days for
photography.
--
Mark
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 05:21:07 -0700, Keith Whaley wrote:
I understand, but I'll never succumb to I.E.
Never!
I use Netscape Communicator 4.79 at the moment.
Opera! Opera! Opera! Opera! Opera! Opera! ... :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
This is tough, but I would pick (from what I have)
16/2.8 fisheye
M50/1.4
M85/2
M*300/4
and to cheat a bit, the Vivitar 2x macro focus converter
William in Utah.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003
The collest thing about these extreme tele lenses is the focusing
scale. While more normal lenses have 15 meters as the last mark
before infinity, this one has 500 m. Just that there is a
difference between focusing at 25o and 500 meters is mindboggling
:-)
Well, yes, they don't focus
Another relatively new sharpening tool is FocalBlade, which
appears to be an unsharp-mask based tool. I'd say it beats Nik
Sharpener Pro by a considerable margin (more flexible,
faster, less grain sharpening). I no longer use actions based
on USM - gimme FocalBlade any day. And I'm thinking of
I've notice the same thing. I go with three lenses:
20-35
50 1.4
100 2.8 or 135 2.5 or Sigma 100-300 DL
I prefer the 100 or 135, but sometimes I need the reach of the zoom.
I've considered a 70-200 or something like that, maybe the Tokina. The
Pentax ones are too cheap or way too expensive
On 10 Sep 2003 at 16:09, whickersworld wrote:
I would recommend:
24mm, 35mm, 85mm, 200mm (my personal choice), or
20mm, 28mm, 50mm, 135mm (for wider angles of view), or
28mm, 50mm, 135mm, 300mm (if you want a longer outfit).
John
My choice would be:
20mm
normal zoom; eg. 24-90 or
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Myself, I'd be using only primes for situations that
required low rectilinear distortion.)
What he said!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
What, in the opinion of the list, is:
A/ too much
B/ just right
C/ a bargain
in any currency you like for the Pentax SMC K 50mm f/1.2 ???
in HM's pounds here in Olde London Towne they are normally priced
around
which days? the Columbus Day weekend is already taken, but the weekend
before has possibilities.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: First Front Cover
I *will* be in that area
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Musical type conductor? If so, where.
And if *not* a musical type conductor, what type???
(I've never met a professional electrical conductor!)
-Original Message-
From: Paul Delcour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:18
We will be spending 3 nights in Cambridge and 2 nights in Rockport, MA,
in early October. Aside from the usual tourist attractions, are there
any neighborhoods/vantage points/buildings etc. that we shouldn't miss
(especially for photography?) We've each been there briefly but never
spent any time
Railroad
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Users Gallery - theme: professional
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Musical type conductor? If so, where.
And if
Hi Chris,
I just can tell you that with my 55/4 I use a regular polarizer
without problems (B+W 77mm diameter).
HTH.
Gianfranco
Chris Stoddart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just discovered that my Cokin P-series polariser
vignettes on the
55mm f/4 for the 6x7 :-( This is using a cut-down
Hi,
Chris wrote:
Oh bugger
Cokin do a bigger system now, called X-Pro. I think it is about 100mm
wide.
mike
Bus or Tram (at least in Europe) :-)
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Musical type conductor? If so, where.
And if *not* a musical type conductor, what type???
(I've never met a professional electrical conductor!)
Chris ding, ding all aboard.
Thanks Herb,
That's interesting. I guess you have gradually built up to this which is
probably the best way to do it unless you're dead lucky. Meanwhile I hope
it's first prize you've won! But congrats anyway on winning and you must
show us the shot when you know?
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, 10 Sep
In M42, the 85mm F1.8 SMCT is the one
to get but it sells for about $200-300
used.
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
Oh, heck, I forgot the most important item:
FocalBlade has Deblur and DeblurPro modes
that seem to do things very similar to focus fixer.
These modes require less RAM than FocusFixer, and have
more User Interface goodies (two sliders and 4 methods
in novice mode, and many more in Pro mode).
I can
I tend to agree with most of what Paul has passed on to us.
I have made my expperiences with many Pentax 135 lenses :
The 1.8 A, K2.5, K-Takumar 2.5, M42-Takumar 2.5, A 2.8, M 3.5
My 135mm experience is similar, except for the M 135/3.5, where my
135/3.5 is the K 135/3.5 (which is a different
i am using FocusFixer on some film camera images taken with my Sigma 15-30
and FA24-90. both are a little softer than i would like. when used gently,
the FocusFixer filter improves things a lot, about the same as turning off
Digital ICE and then applying a slight sharpen in Photoshop, but without
Hilversum and surrounding areas, Netherlands.
:-)
Paul
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:06:34 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pentax Users Gallery - theme: professional
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Thu, 11
Keith,
I have the SMC 85/1.8 and absolutely love it. It may not be full portrait,
but the 1.8 gives a lot of candid opportunities with little light. Great to
observe people and snap.
:-)
Paul Delcour
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003
You'be amazed at much electricity I conduct when conducting...
:-)
Paul Delcour
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:52:49 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Users Gallery - theme: professional
Resent-From: [EMAIL
I'd love to have railroad as a theme being a mad train lover myself, though,
whenever I take pictures of trains myself I am never happy with the result.
Somnehow I do not seem to have the feel for how to put them in the frame
properly. O well, I'll just enjoy the real thing.
:-)
Paul Delcour
Actually I met several picturesque coach drivers. They certainly
displayed a conductor's sobriety. Anyone around? ;o)
Servus,Alin
Chris wrote:
CS Bus or Tram (at least in Europe) :-)
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Musical type conductor? If so, where.
And if *not* a
Ah Fred, that reminds me that the min. focus disctance at 1.7m
makes the lens partly useless. I often get much closer than that.
Min focus distance is an annoying aspect of many lenses - for me,
it's not a constant annoyance, but only an occasional frustration,
but sometimes - depending on the
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I *will* be in that area in mid-October, actually! Going up to Rochester
for a 10-mile race but plan on getting in a couple of extra days for
photography.
which days? the Columbus Day weekend is already taken, but the
Paul wrote:
PD that reminds me that the min. focus disctance at 1.7m makes the lens partly
PD useless. I often get much closer than that.
Sorry to disapoint you, the K 135/2.5 you narrowed your search to is
limited to 1.5 m (enough for portraits if you ask me, but tastes may
vary). To get
On 11/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I understand, but I'll never succumb to I.E.
Never!
I use Netscape Communicator 4.79 at the moment.
Opera! Opera! Opera! Opera! Opera! Opera! ... :-)
SAFARI !
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
probably won't work then. another time.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: First Front Cover
The race is on Saturday, October 18. I'll probably come a day early and
shoot
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I've notice the same thing. I go with three lenses:
20-35
50 1.4
100 2.8 or 135 2.5 or Sigma 100-300 DL
I prefer the 100 or 135, but sometimes I need the reach of the zoom.
Either way,
I still seem to like the 3 lens approach: wide, normal and fast, long.
I've only got
Brother Chris,
Did you discover this from the viewfinder or from finished shots? Did
you notice that there was a difference when wide open vs. stopped
down? As I will be in a position to use this combination on the
upcoming NorCal PDML outing, I am most curious.
Thanks for the info.
Brother
Mark, you may want to avoid thumbnails in the database if you're
talking huge amounts of pictures.
BTW, I am sure someone has mentioned -- but, if they haven't, link
thumbnails, do not embed them in the database. Embedding graphics in an Access
database
bloats the whole thing memory-wise and
FYI,
Here's a dozen or so 35mm shots I took yesterday
morning with some of my trusty takumars
kodak tmax 100:
http://www.jcoconnell.com/cspark.htm
Hadnt used my Pentax 35mm gear in almost 6 months,
(have been 4X5ing a lot lately). Not bad really...
Unfortunately, my epson 2450 died
right
Herb Chong wrote:
the image size is pretty small and they don't have a link to anything
larger. here is where it is on my web site:
http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/Random/Selected_Images3.htm. it's most of
the way down the page. click on it to get a larger view. they cropped the
edges to
P.S. Your best choice for automatic field fill in, is probably creating some
drop down lists. You cam do this in the form wizard.
Marnie aka Doe And linking your tables, as others have mentioned.
i shot for fine art/gallery composition and they needed a cover shot. i
didn't do any verticals of this set of cascades.
when i get a chance to spend about 3 or 4 days working on it, i'll have my
editorial stock site up and running. this set of pages in the link are the
portfolio pages and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think about what the word professional means to you.
Then try to capture it in a single frame.
Good luck.
I am really looking forward to seeing this gallery.
So do I :-)
Maybe we'll even have some non-technical
A friend of mine is looking for a good condition Pentax MX. I'm not
selling him mine(!) and I thought checking here would be a better bet
than scouring eBay.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Yes. But the K-mount version goes for
$400-$500 on ebay. OUCH!
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
My SMC Tak 135mm f/2.5, Model I, gets down to 1.5 meters.
My Tak (Bayonet) 135mm f/2.5 gets down to 1.2 meters.
keith whaley
Paul Delcour wrote:
I see. O well, I'll have to live with that. Anyone know if the Takumar gets
closer?
:-)
Paul Delcour
From: Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good point! We're not going to miss it entirely though. We'll be staying
near Concord the first night and probably spend some time in Concord the
next day, and we'll be out of the city our last 2 days. I'm sure we'll
see lots of turning trees. Thanks for your other suggestions, btw.
Is it true
Wow! That's a substantial price!
Any idea what they sold for new?
keith
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Yes. But the K-mount version goes for
$400-$500 on ebay. OUCH!
JCO
Hi,
Andre wrote:
What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter +
winding (compared
to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a reference)?
Can't compare them to the references, as I don't have either but,
compared to each other, I would say that the MZ-S is quieter.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
BTW, checkout the contrast in the 35mm03s image!
Stunning!
I also like the depth of field in the 24mm 04s. And the one immediately
following.
Excellent work...
keith whaley
amazing for a non-multicoated, 1965 vintage super-takumar lens,
JCO
John Francis wrote:
(Only one Common, I believe).
Actually, there is only one Commons.
For high altitude hiking : M20mm, 40mm, 85mm and 170mm f4 (from 85mm + 2X).
For shows: fast 28, 50, 85 and 135 lenses.
Andre
--
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (whickersworld) wrote:
Patrick Wunsch wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag,
which ones would you chose and why.
For 35mm, it would be 17mm, 24mm, 35mm, 85mm. I mostly shoot interiors and
portraits, and the 85mm gets
Check KEH.
I saw a black one in excellent-plus condition there recently.
- THaller
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
