Hey,
As an update, I managed to push the changes in devel (can see them in
https://code.bioconductor.org/browse/omada/commits/devel) but I am still
waiting for the build (
https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.19/bioc-LATEST/omada/) to go green.
After that happens I have to cherry-pick from
If your company is going to ensure that a package called pkgCompany is
only looked for in a local repo by installl.packages() and friends,
I think in your cpmpany wide R installation you can set the option
"available_packages_filters" to a self written one that is exclusively
reporting results
On 02.04.2024 14:07, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 April 2024 at 17:44, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| Untested:
|
| install.packages() calls available.packages() to find out which packages
| are available - and passes a "filters" argument if supplied.
| That can be a user defined filter. It should be
Jan,
Thats only the case if you want to allow later version numbers to override
the versions in the internal repository, the "known-good" is more important
than "latest" point above.
Having a defined set of dependencies while still maintaining currency is a
difficult problem. Always fetching
Duncan,
I have fixed up the repo with git restore-mtime -- I think that should solve it
- please check if it did what we needed.
Cheers,
Simon
> On Apr 3, 2024, at 2:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2024 8:50 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> On 2 April 2024 at 07:37, Dirk
Hi,
You should increment your version in the DESCRIPTION file for the build system
to recognize and propagate the
change:https://contributions.bioconductor.org/description.html?q=version#description-ver.
You can follow up with me if you don't see the change. It takes the devel
builders about
What is the name of your package?
Please keep in mind there are always two active branches of Bioconductor,
currently RELEASE_3_18 and devel. Based on the information provided 1.28.0
would refer to a release version of a package while a verison number of 1.29.0
would indicate a devel
Last week I updated my package to fix a build error and pushed the devel
branch back to bioconductor, which I confirmed by cloning the devel branch
on a different computer and I see my changes there. However, the
multiplatform build is still using the wrong version (1.28, vs my corrected
version
Interesting. That would also mean that putting a company repo first does
not protect against dependency confusion attacks (people intentionally
uploading packages with the same name as company internal packages on
CRAN;
On 2 April 2024 at 09:41, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 02/04/2024 8:50 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 2 April 2024 at 07:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > blosxom, simple as it is, takes (IIRC) filesystem ctime as the posting
| > timestamp so would be best if you had a backup with the old
On 02/04/2024 8:50 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 2 April 2024 at 07:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 2 April 2024 at 08:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| | I have just added R-4-4-branch to the feeds. I think I've also fixed
| | the \I issue, so today's news includes a long list of old
Many thanks Duncan,
I tried to look into the code but didn't manage to advance much due to some
java configuration issues.
To prevent being flooded by content of old versions I added a filter to
only repost those that the release version of the branch is in the title of
the content.
Maybe this
On 2 April 2024 at 07:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 2 April 2024 at 08:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| | I have just added R-4-4-branch to the feeds. I think I've also fixed
| | the \I issue, so today's news includes a long list of old changes.
|
| These feeds can fussy: looks like you
On 2 April 2024 at 08:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I have just added R-4-4-branch to the feeds. I think I've also fixed
| the \I issue, so today's news includes a long list of old changes.
These feeds can fussy: looks like you triggered many updates. Feedly
currently greets me with 569 new
I have just added R-4-4-branch to the feeds. I think I've also fixed
the \I issue, so today's news includes a long list of old changes.
Duncan Murdoch
On 16/03/2024 8:47 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I have now put the files online at https://github.com/dmurdoch/diffnews
. It seemed like too
On 1 April 2024 at 17:44, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| Untested:
|
| install.packages() calls available.packages() to find out which packages
| are available - and passes a "filters" argument if supplied.
| That can be a user defined filter. It should be possible to write a user
| defined filter which
16 matches
Mail list logo
