>
> ...but that's a luxury someone would have to pay for.
>
I'd happily give up my Netflix subscription for this. I suspect the
R-foundation/consortium could assist as well?
Referring to the "Using Rust in CRAN packages" document we must be able to
...download a specific version from a secure
polars be able to exist on CRAN.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:06 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 08.05.2024 17:56, Josiah Parry wrote:
> > Thank you, Dirk. This was a direct email from a CRAN member and not part
> of
> > the automatic checks. The whole email is below. I think the i
l the work
of creating a way to build, store, and retrieve the dependencies only for
CRAN to decide they don't support it.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 3:32 PM Ivan Krylov wrote:
> В Wed, 8 May 2024 14:08:36 -0400
> Josiah Parry пишет:
>
> > With ChatGPT's ability to write autoconf, I
or has changed (and not give
> a check warning nor error)."
>
> Neal
>
> [1]: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:03 AM Josiah Parry
> wrote:
> >
> > I am sorry for blowing up this thread lately.
> >
kage.
Best,
Yes, prqlr is a great Rust-based package! My other Rust based packages that
are on CRAN are based, in part on prqlr.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:51 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 8 May 2024 at 11:02, Josiah Parry wrote:
> | CRAN has rejected this package with:
>
I am sorry for blowing up this thread lately.
I've submitted a package to CRAN that uses Rust which thus requires
dependencies to be vendored. https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgisutils/
The vendored dependencies are 18mb when zipped and 16.4mb when zipped with
XZ -9e. The *installed package size
Thanks to @yutannihilation for pointing out that the issue repros on
r-universe
https://github.com/r-universe/r-arcgis/actions/runs/8990426306/job/24695887245
.
Do folks know if there are any templates for the linux CRAN check? It
appears that the r-lib/actions linux checks don't cover all of the
:40 Ivan Krylov wrote:
> В Tue, 7 May 2024 14:03:42 -0400
> Josiah Parry пишет:
>
> > This NOTE does not appear in Ubuntu, Mac, or Windows checks
> >
> https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgisutils
> /actions/runs/8989812276/job/24693685840
> <https://github.com/
I've submitted an R package to CRAN and am failing checks *only on Debian*
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/arcgisutils_0.3.0_20240507_194020/Debian/00check.log
This NOTE does not appear in Ubuntu, Mac, or Windows checks
In my Makevars file (linked below) I link to ssl by adding `-lssl` to
`PKG_LIBS`. Since I do this, does libssl need to be added to the System
Requirements field?
Makevars:
https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgisgeocode/blob/8194a478a616f7ddc3a25bcb024c0534007bcd51/src/Makevars#L4
If so, is there a
I agree with Ivan here. And more generally, R is a fully featured
programming language. You don't need just this one "exploit" (though, it
really does feel like a feature to some degree lol!) to be a bad guy with
R.
You can link to a pre-compiled binary (like my team makes for an R package
that
Well, after trying to install the package, I believe the issue is because
margins has been archived.
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/margins/index.html
You can check recursive dependencies using
`tools::package_dependencies("pkg", recursive = TRUE)` which would help you
in this case. I
My understanding is that the order of CRAN repos available in
`options("repos")` are tried sequentially. So if cran.r-rproject.org is
first, that will be tried. If the package is not available there, the next
repository will be tried.
I do appreciate the ease of release to R-universe quite a bit
name
> and email address of the new maintainer.
>
> Best,
> Josh
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 10:38 AM Josiah Parry
> wrote:
> >
> > I intend to change the maintainer of my package {sfdep}
> > https://cran.r-project.org/package=sfdep.
> > Is the process
[1] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html#Submission
>
> On February 8, 2024 8:37:50 AM PST, Josiah Parry
> wrote:
> >I intend to change the maintainer of my package {sfdep}
> >https://cran.r-project.org/package=sfdep.
> >Is the process as simple as submittin
I intend to change the maintainer of my package {sfdep}
https://cran.r-project.org/package=sfdep.
Is the process as simple as submitting a new release where the DESCRIPTION
file changes who has the role of `aut`?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
a.m., Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 7:48 AM Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25/01/2024 10:27 a.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> I've encountered use of the native pipe operator in the examp
Hey all,
I've encountered use of the native pipe operator in the examples for
'httr2' e.g.
request("http://example.com;) |> req_dry_run()
Since r-oldrel (according to rversions::r_oldrel()) is now 4.2.3, can the
native pipe be used in example code?
I do notice that the package httr2 requires
Thanks for the update!
Ill be submitting a change in the coming days and will report back :)
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:12 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 January 2024 at 10:28, Josiah Parry wrote:
> | Oddly making the change has made CI happy.
> |
> https://github.com/R-Arc
Oddly making the change has made CI happy.
https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgisutils/actions/runs/7543315551/job/20534063601
It may be that the issue was OS related but I'm unsure since only oldrel
for windows and macos check results are published
Hey folks! I've received note that a package of mine is failing tests on
oldrel.
Check results:
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-oldrel-windows-x86_64/arcgisutils-00check.html
I think I've narrowed it down to the way that I've written the test which
uses `as.POSIXct(Sys.Date(), tz =
AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 10.01.2024 15:35, Josiah Parry wrote:
> > Thanks, all. As it goes, the package submission failed. The package that
> > is suggested is available at https://r.esri.com/bin/
> > <https://r.esri.com/bin/> and as such provided `ht
; Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>
> On 03.01.2024 18:19, Josiah Parry wrote:
> > Thanks, both. I'm not familiar with Additional_repositories. Must the
> > package source be specified there? Or can it be specified via
> > documentation a la Rd file?
> >
> >
Alternatively, you can create a new environment in your package and assign
into it and fetch out of it. This is definitely safer and probably "more
idiomatic." Hope that helps!
# create a new environment
I understand that this doesn't actually *solve *your problem, but would
like to offer an alternative perspective.
I often find that vignettes may be most useful as an extended form of
documentation. If you have a pkgdown site, you can use
`usethis::use_article()` to create an article which will
Thanks, both. I'm not familiar with Additional_repositories. Must the
package source be specified there? Or can it be specified via documentation
a la Rd file?
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:14 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 03.01.2024 17:58, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > On 03/01/2024 11:
Lovely, thank you!
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:43 AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 03.01.2024 17:33, Josiah Parry wrote:
> > I have a scenario where I have an exported function that requires the
> > installation a package that *is not* available on CRAN. The body of the
>
I have a scenario where I have an exported function that requires the
installation a package that *is not* available on CRAN. The body of the
function is generally:
fx <- function() {
rlang::check_installed("noncranpkg")
noncranpkg::gx()
}
As required, this package is in the Suggests field.
Unfortunately, it is often important for us to pay attention to what
machines our code is being tested on.
I think the point is more or less that we often find ourselves trying to
make super small adjustments for machines and builds that are used by a
number of users in the single digits. The
Rafael,
I believe the issue is that packages cannot include binary *executables.* If
you have a binary file (such as a parquet file) in inst/extdata, I do not
think that would be a problem. It would be a good idea to ensure that that
file is small, though. I think downloading a file is a big no
In these cases, I unfortunately find the best approach to be to wrap the
examples in `if (interactive()) ` to ensure that they will not be ran on
CRAN tests machines. It hampers the checks of CRAN but it makes it possible
to get usable code to users.
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 9:54 AM Artur Araujo
31 matches
Mail list logo
