Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19939
**[Test build #84692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84692/testReport)**
for PR 19939 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19939
cc @cloud-fan @ueshin @srowen @JannikArndt
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19939
[SPARK-20557] [SQL] Only support TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE for Oracle Dialect
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the previous PRs,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19938
**[Test build #84691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84691/testReport)**
for PR 19938 at commit
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19938
[SPARK-22747][SQL] Localize lifetime of mutable states in HashAggregateExec
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR localizes lifetime of mutable states, which are used
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19918#discussion_r155939348
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/typeCoercion/native/binaryComparison.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
+--
+-- Licensed to the
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19933
I think you miss my point. Please image that I am an infra team member in a
company, and spark users are almost using spark sql or just offering an
application jar. What I want is get the submit
Github user caneGuy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19764
Ping
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84689/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
**[Test build #84689 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84689/testReport)**
for PR 19932 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
I confirmed that this failure does not occur after merging #19937 in my
environment.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19928
Thank you for review and approval, @HyukjinKwon !
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84690/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
**[Test build #84690 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84690/testReport)**
for PR 19527 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
ping @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
**[Test build #84690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84690/testReport)**
for PR 19527 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
**[Test build #84689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84689/testReport)**
for PR 19932 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932#discussion_r155936167
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -353,15 +374,6 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932#discussion_r155936087
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -213,6 +213,29 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19754
(The package build failure, which began Nov 26, is:)
```
gpg: skipped
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19754
The package build was failing for a while, but the docs build has a
probably-related new error:
```
ATTENTION! Your password for authentication realm:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934
Hi @liancheng, @steveloughran and @srowen.
What do you think about the current approach? The JIRA seems targeting
"Spark's local dir should accept only local paths" and it's my best
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932#discussion_r155935430
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -213,6 +213,29 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r155935022
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark-base/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717#discussion_r155934917
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/spark-base/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155934663
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
sounds like a good to go from @vanzin and a couple of others too.
any other comment?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
yes!
sorry about the delay, I think there's a lot of interests in this PR.
@gatorsmile @viirya ?
---
-
To
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19754
yes, specifically this changes the output location for
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20Packaging/job/spark-master-docs/
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19805#discussion_r155934026
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -537,9 +537,48 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*/
@Experimental
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84688/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
**[Test build #84688 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84688/testReport)**
for PR 19865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84687/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
**[Test build #84687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84687/testReport)**
for PR 19865 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19676#discussion_r155929522
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaKMeansExample.java ---
@@ -51,9 +52,14 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19676#discussion_r155928871
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaKMeansExample.java ---
@@ -51,9 +52,14 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84685/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937
**[Test build #84685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84685/testReport)**
for PR 19937 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19525
**[Test build #84686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84686/testReport)**
for PR 19525 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19525
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84686/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19525
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155927167
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user danielvdende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19911
@dongjoon-hyun @gatorsmile As @gatorsmile pointed out, the
`isCascadingTruncateTable` is a method in the public API, so we can't just drop
it. I've made changes again, now the truncate query
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
**[Test build #84688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84688/testReport)**
for PR 19865 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155927018
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155926973
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
**[Test build #84687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84687/testReport)**
for PR 19865 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155926812
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84684/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934
**[Test build #84684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84684/testReport)**
for PR 19934 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155926316
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19936
@khanm002, could you close this please?
If you are going to propose a change, please follow this linke -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19931
Oh, thank you so much, @HyukjinKwon .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19525
**[Test build #84686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84686/testReport)**
for PR 19525 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937#discussion_r155925941
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -617,6 +619,7 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865
@cloud-fan unfortunately, #19878 did not fix this issue. #19937 will fix
this issue.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937
**[Test build #84685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84685/testReport)**
for PR 19937 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Ok, I understood. In other words, the extra category is added as the last
category and `dropLast` option works as before. It makes sense to me.
---
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19937
[SPARK-22746][SQL] Avoid the generation of useless mutable states by
SortMergeJoin
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reduce the number of global mutable variables
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19754
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19754
merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user khanm002 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19935
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19933
You're just using this as a write-only config to pass info, and it's for
your own app-specific purposes. It's easier to just pass this info or log it in
your app.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19935
@khanm002 close this
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19936
@khanm002 close this
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user khanm002 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19936#discussion_r155924835
--- Diff: repl/src/main/scala/spark/repl/SparkILoop.scala ---
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ class SparkILoop(in0: Option[BufferedReader], val out:
PrintWriter, val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19936
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19935
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user khanm002 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19936
Branch 0.5
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch
GitHub user khanm002 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19935
Branch 0.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84683/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
**[Test build #84683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84683/testReport)**
for PR 19594 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934
**[Test build #84684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84684/testReport)**
for PR 19934 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934#discussion_r155922544
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -829,7 +829,18 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19934
[SPARK-3685][CORE] Prints explicit warnings when configured local
directories are set to URIs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to print warnings
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19933
How about change it to system property and it can show in Spark UI. It
really can help user (platform team) to trace, control and support application.
---
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932#discussion_r155921370
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -413,32 +413,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
**[Test build #84683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84683/testReport)**
for PR 19594 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
retest this please..
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84682/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594
**[Test build #84682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84682/testReport)**
for PR 19594 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19931
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19931
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19931
@dongjoon-hyun mind double checking if there is anything we should do as a
followup before we go merging this?
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84680/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19932
**[Test build #84680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84680/testReport)**
for PR 19932 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19933
Your app can already log what it likes. This isn't a config, just an
attempt to pass a piece of info. I think this should be closed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19676
**[Test build #84681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84681/testReport)**
for PR 19676 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19676
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84681/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19676
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
