Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114
**[Test build #90623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90623/testReport)**
for PR 21114 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21310
I will take a look later today.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user rajeshcode commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
Is this patch will work for spark-sql --master local mode as well.
In our environment localmode is not supporting proxy user where as yarn
mode looks ok. Do we have a solution for
Github user fangshil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21310
@viirya @cloud-fan before I add test, could you guys take a look and
advise if the approach taken in this patch is acceptable?
---
Github user artemrd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114#discussion_r188170023
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/AccumulatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -237,6 +236,65 @@ class AccumulatorSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Matchers
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90615/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800
**[Test build #90615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90615/testReport)**
for PR 20800 at commit
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21260
@er0sin PVCs can be mounted similarly to the example below:
```
spark.kubernetes.driver.volumes.persistentVolumeClaim.pv1.mount.path=/mnt
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90613/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
**[Test build #90613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90613/testReport)**
for PR 21221 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114#discussion_r188164036
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/AccumulatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -237,6 +236,65 @@ class AccumulatorSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Matchers
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3219/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
**[Test build #90622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90622/testReport)**
for PR 21327 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
[SPARK-24107][CORE][followup] ChunkedByteBuffer.writeFully method has not
reset the limit value
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
According to the discussion in
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
cc @manbuyun @JoshRosen @jiangxb1987
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21175#discussion_r188161280
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -63,10 +63,15 @@ private[spark] class ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21175#discussion_r188160813
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -63,10 +63,15 @@ private[spark] class ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks:
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21175
No, I mean that the code here can simply follow the write call as straight
through code. We don't need to guard against exceptions here because the
duplicate of the buffer is used only by a
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21175#discussion_r188160044
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -63,10 +63,15 @@ private[spark] class ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Not sure why, but previously calling `ListVector.clear`, I must change the
reset order to reset element writer first to pass the test:
```scala
override def reset(): Unit = {
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3218/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
**[Test build #90621 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90621/testReport)**
for PR 21312 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21239
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90609/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21239
**[Test build #90609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90609/testReport)**
for PR 21239 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21175#discussion_r188154900
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -63,10 +63,15 @@ private[spark] class ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90610/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90617/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
**[Test build #90617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90617/testReport)**
for PR 21325 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3217/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
**[Test build #90610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90610/testReport)**
for PR 21291 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21175#discussion_r188154716
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -63,10 +63,15 @@ private[spark] class ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
**[Test build #90620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90620/testReport)**
for PR 21326 at commit
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
@rdblue @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
[SPARK-24275][SQL] Revise doc comments in InputPartition
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In #21145, DataReaderFactory is renamed to InputPartition.
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21322
One concern I have is, now we keep broadcasted variables in
`BroadcastManager.cachedValues` by using weak reference. So if a broadcasted
variable with `AutoCloseable` is released before we call
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3216/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21257
**[Test build #90619 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90619/testReport)**
for PR 21257 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
**[Test build #90618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90618/testReport)**
for PR 21312 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114#discussion_r188152980
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/AccumulatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -237,6 +236,65 @@ class AccumulatorSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user er0sin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21260
How does one configure a PV/PVC with this change?
`spark.kubernetes.executor.volumes=pvName:containerPath` ?
---
-
To
Github user artemrd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114
There's "get accum" test which does this, it was updated for new behavior.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3215/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
**[Test build #90617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90617/testReport)**
for PR 21325 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21153
OK. Looks like AppVeyor build is ok now.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
also need this in branch-2.1
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21325
[R] backport lint fix
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
backport part of the commit that addresses lintr issue
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21315
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20872
actually this PR linked to a wrong JIRA, @maropu can you create a new jira
and fix it? thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90616/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
**[Test build #90616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90616/testReport)**
for PR 21267 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21315
merged to master/2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90614/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
**[Test build #90614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90614/testReport)**
for PR 21267 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20636
ping @hvanhovell
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21165
I think we can just update MimaExcludes, since it's developer API. cc
@JoshRosen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114
can we do this?
```
var acc = ...
... // launch a long running job
val accId = acc.getId
acc = null
gc
... // job finished
```
accumulator is created by
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21322
I think users are responsible to call `Broadcast#destroy`, which unpersist
broadcast blocks from block manager and run user-defined driver side cleanup.
It is a valid use case to allow
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19840
@vanzin I am not very familiar with python part
[context.py#L191](https://github.com/yaooqinn/spark/blob/8ff5663fe9a32eae79c8ee6bc310409170a8da64/python/pyspark/context.py#L191),
so handle it at
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3214/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
**[Test build #90616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90616/testReport)**
for PR 21267 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3213/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267
**[Test build #90614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90614/testReport)**
for PR 21267 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800
**[Test build #90615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90615/testReport)**
for PR 20800 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21267#discussion_r188144573
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -211,9 +211,22 @@ def _do_init(self, master, appName, sparkHome,
pyFiles, environment, batchSize,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20800
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user sohama4 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21316#discussion_r188143976
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1607,7 +1607,9 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21028#discussion_r188143390
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -529,6 +567,239 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90611/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21183
**[Test build #90611 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90611/testReport)**
for PR 21183 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90608/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21323
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21323
**[Test build #90608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90608/testReport)**
for PR 21323 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
**[Test build #90613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90613/testReport)**
for PR 21221 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21153
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90612/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21153
**[Test build #90612 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90612/testReport)**
for PR 21153 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21153
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user edwinalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r188136532
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1753,9 +1766,21 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user edwinalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r188136553
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Heartbeater.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
It looks like the `ListVector` also needs `setLastSet` to be called with 0,
which is only in `ListVector`. This is fine though, since `ListVector` is the
only vector extending
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21153
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3212/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21153
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Ok. I will use manual reset for now and leave a TODO comment.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
I'm okay with either way.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3211/
1 - 100 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
