On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:57:12 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
The mission statement of the Sage project is: Create a viable free
open source alternative to Magma, Maple, Matlab, and Mathematica.
I came up with this statement one year after starting the project, and
have stuck with it
On Monday, February 11, 2013 9:12:08 PM UTC+1, mhampton wrote:
I think this could be valuable, but it is not clear to me what SimPy
can do. We definitely need more capability for simulation with
interactive controls in Sage.
If SimPy is all Tkinter-based, it might be hard to
On 02/12/2013 03:12 PM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
-in my country, many people use matlab only for graphics; Sage as good
graphics, but not yet exactly at the same level as matlab.
I would say the graphics _output_ in Sage is better than in matlab - try
introducing antialiasing of figures in
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 8:12:42 AM UTC+1, tdumont wrote:
-parallelism: matlab as some interesting things...Sage has only mpi and
forks...
... wait until ipython 0.13 is properly inside sage:
http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/dev/parallel/
H
--
You received this message because
On Monday, February 11, 2013 7:38:08 PM UTC+1, Christian Kuper wrote:
I would be greatly interested in your opinion why you think no.
Well, I wasn't that serious and it's just for me personally. Can you give
me some examples what this package could do? I'm happy to learn more every
day :-)
+1 for having a FEM implementation.
I've seen some of the codes in numerical GR (Cactus) and they are
definitely not generic FEM implementations that one could apply to a wide
range of problems ;-)
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:12:42 AM UTC, tdumont wrote:
I like FreeFem++
Le 12/02/2013 11:55, Volker Braun a écrit :
+1 for having a FEM implementation.
I've seen some of the codes in numerical GR (Cactus) and they are
definitely not generic FEM implementations that one could apply to a
wide range of problems ;-)
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:12:42 AM UTC,
Hello Harald,
thanks for your quick reply
Honestly personal answer: no. But I'm happy to be proven wrong :-)
I would be greatly interested in your opinion why you think no.
Simulation does play a big role when analysing systems (which I use Sage
for) and I personally like having the whole
I think this could be valuable, but it is not clear to me what SimPy
can do. We definitely need more capability for simulation with
interactive controls in Sage.
If SimPy is all Tkinter-based, it might be hard to incorporate it into
the notebook. At the moment the most promising route forward
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Christian Kuper
christian.ku...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello Harald,
thanks for your quick reply
Honestly personal answer: no. But I'm happy to be proven wrong :-)
I would be greatly interested in your opinion why you think no. Simulation
does play a big role
Le 11/02/2013 22:57, William Stein a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Christian Kuper
christian.ku...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello Harald,
thanks for your quick reply
Honestly personal answer: no. But I'm happy to be proven wrong :-)
I would be greatly interested in your opinion why
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 9:17:55 PM UTC+1, Christian Kuper wrote:
Do you think something like this would be useful?
Honestly personal answer: no. But I'm happy to be proven wrong :-)
Since it is a normal python package, the first step of integrating this
into sage is to package it as an
12 matches
Mail list logo
