Re: [sage-devel] Re: stopping cypari2, pari-jupyter and pplpy maintenance

2024-03-13 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Thanks Matthias. You are now an owner on PyPI. On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 22:59, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Thanks, Vincent, for all your work on these projects in the past, and for > letting us know about your decision. > As https://github.com/sagemath/cypari2/issues/131 indicates (and previously

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

2024-03-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 6:13:42 PM UTC David Roe wrote: Dear Sage developers, Thank you for those you nominated people for the committee following my request , and thank you for those of you willing to serve. The

Re: [sage-devel] Re: conda sage

2024-03-13 Thread William Stein
With switching to Miniforge it is now working for me extremely well. I’m going to be making a new video and tutorial about this soon. Thanks for all you do Isuru! -- William Stein On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:11 AM Isuru Fernando wrote: > Hi William, > > Let me know if you have any questions

Re: [sage-devel] Re: conda sage

2024-03-13 Thread Isuru Fernando
Hi William, Let me know if you have any questions regarding conda installation of sage. It'd be great to have more visibility towards conda installation to attract more users and developers in particular who can help out. Thanks, Isuru On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 7:37 PM William Stein wrote: >

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

2024-03-13 Thread John H Palmieri
Dear all, First, in response to Dima's post: yes, it should definitely be Nils Bruin on the ballot. My sincere apologies to Nils that we got his name wrong! If anyone would like to adjust their ballot in light of this, please let us know and we will make any corrections you request. Second,

[sage-devel] UniqueRepresentation MRO Question

2024-03-13 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hi everyone, On https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37128, we find it useful to swap the order of the base classes for UniqueRepresentation. Thus, it becomes class UniqueRepresentation(WithEqualityById, CachedRepresentation): I believe this is very reasonable since we want to have

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

2024-03-13 Thread Giacomo Pope
Thanks David, there's a bunch of nice things we could do for genus two in various cases which would be worth including. The inert case, where all degree zero divisors (except the identity element) have u with degree 2 would probably allow something particularly nice. As another update I have

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

2024-03-13 Thread Nils Bruin
One thing that may deserve a cursory check is the overhead involved in inheriting from AlgebraicScheme_subscheme_toric class . Some parent structures are optimized for prolonged use *after* creation and may do a lot of caching/precomputation. There may be scenarios where one wants to construct

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

2024-03-13 Thread Giacomo Pope
Thanks so much for the context Oh interesting. In this case I wonder whether we should work on and include a new class (maybe something as simple as a WeightedProjectiveSpace and a curve from this) mirroring the implementation for the plane curves. Alternatively I could go into the old plane

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: disputed PRs

2024-03-13 Thread David Roe
The vote has passed. There are currently 36 open disputed PRs . Given the extensive comments on some of these PRs, I would agree that we should follow some version of Karl-Dieter's suggestion. In particular, while the author of the PR remains