On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 10:27 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
The current trac.sagemath.org mail notification section is the following:
[notification]
always_notify_owner = true
always_notify_reporter =
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
As regards Scilab and Sage, I think that Ronan Paixão has worked on a
Sage-Scilab interface. From my reading of the Scilab license, I think
it can be legally problematic to include Scilab in Sage, but I'm not a
Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
As regards Scilab and Sage, I think that Ronan Paixão has worked on a
Sage-Scilab interface. From my reading of the Scilab license, I think
it can be legally problematic to include Scilab in
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
On a note related to the Scilab --- Sage interface, there's an
experimental spkg up on trac. See ticket #4821 at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4821
But the Scilab version for the spkg is a bit outdated.
On 2009-Mar-23 12:38:45 -0700, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
FreeBSD and I've reached the point where I can compile sage-3.4 on
FreeBSD-8/amd64 (using gcc/g++/gfortran 4.3) and get it to start.
Which FreeBSD release are you using?
As I said, 8-current/amd64.
This is way too much - I
Hello SAGE people.
Everything is in the title. Several attempts with make leading to
the exact same point of failure.
The install log file :
http://download206.mediafire.com/nzjxxh0x9jmg/4ljzjnh2mdd/install.log
I'm on Debian Lenny with gcc -v :
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
On a note related to the Scilab --- Sage interface, there's an
experimental spkg up on trac. See ticket #4821 at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4821
But the Scilab version for the
Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
currently in use) file SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex:
lots of mathbf, no mathbb.
Is this an official style choice for Sage, or did it just
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
currently in use) file SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex:
lots
On Mar 24, 1:27 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I temporarily put a few ip's into /etc/resolv.conf until I can restart
the vmware server safely (i.e., I'm onsite), and according to
Alfredo,
I finally got your point. Sincerely I didn't know that such thing as
requesting
a particular feature in the LiveCD was possible, that's why I built mine.
I also want to make clear that my intention is not to take your place or
anyone's, I just built that distro and thought it would be
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:27 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 1:27 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I temporarily put a few ip's into /etc/resolv.conf until I can restart
the
You all make good points. Certainly more documentation for applied
stuff is called for, and I really like the idea of a configuration
command to avert having to maintain a separate version. Didn't even
think of that!
As regards size, I do think that it would be an important factor. I am
much
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
currently in use) file
Hi Lucio,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Lucio Lastra luciolas...@gmail.com wrote:
I finally got your point. Sincerely I didn't know that such thing as
requesting
a particular feature in the LiveCD was possible, that's why I built mine.
I also want to make clear that my intention is not
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:02 AM, bourbabis bourba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello SAGE people.
Everything is in the title. Several attempts with make leading to
the exact same point of failure.
The install log file :
http://download206.mediafire.com/nzjxxh0x9jmg/4ljzjnh2mdd/install.log
That
Hi folks,
It seems like I can't ping sage.math at all. My previous connections
have timed out and I can't even get the site
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on?
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
It seems like I can't ping sage.math at all. My previous connections
have timed out and I can't even get the site
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on?
Same here:
$ ping sage.math.washington.edu
PING
I'm in favor of making some of these LaTeX choices configurable.
William's example of the grouping symbols for matrices (e.g. square
brackets or large parentheses) is the first thing I thought of. I
never liked Mathematica's choice and was always just cutting out the
rows of a matrix to use
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
It seems like I can't ping sage.math at all. My previous connections
have timed out and I can't even get the site
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on?
The
Hi,
I just noticed ipython doing:
In [4]: print f.series(x)
-- print(f.series(x))
1 - a*x + a**2*x**2 - a**3*x**3 + a**4*x**4 - a**5*x**5 + O(x**6)
and I like it, so it may be a nice idea for sage to be able to
optionally turn this on, so that it shows what the preparser is doing
to the
21 matches
Mail list logo
