Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Dear Martin, Le vendredi 28 décembre 2018 14:07:51 UTC+1, Martin R a écrit : > > Just in case it was overlooked: > It *has* *been* overlooked, indeed. I just discovered thiqs post. Can't reasonably test it before 2019, but will try to do so first thing text year.. With abject apologies, --

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

At least, the GAP upgrade is in 8.6.beta0 464c9142ab Trac #22626: Upgrade to GAP 4.10 I am also concerned about the Debian freeze and would be happy to see a 8.6 soon enough... Volker, can you clarify the situation? Le 28/12/2018 à 12:17, E. Madison Bray a écrit : Okay, so 8.5 has been

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Just in case it was overlooked: I fixed the bug reported by Emmanuel above in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26929, no review yet, (and no comments either) though. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Okay, so 8.5 has been released. What's the plan for 8.6? On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > I'm inclined to release 8.5 this weekend... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

I narrowed it down to a single commit (which turns out to be a single ticket), see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26929#comment:9 I am unable to debug this further though. Martin Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2018 20:57:27 UTC+1 schrieb John H Palmieri: > > What is the extent of the bug? Does

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

What is the extent of the bug? Does it require forming a polynomial ring whose coefficients are a BooleanPolynomialRing? That's pretty specific. If the problem arises more generally, with other rings as coefficients, then it could be a blocker. On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 11:49:30 AM

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Even considering the pivotal rôle of polynomials and fraction fields thereof ? Le jeudi 20 décembre 2018 20:47:03 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > Critical but it's not a blocker, in my opinion. > > > On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: >> >>

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Critical but it's not a blocker, in my opinion. On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > This seems > seems to be a showstopper, enough to trump the best laid out plans of mice, > men

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

This seems seems to be a showstopper, enough to trump the best laid out plans of mice, men and mathematicians. No ticket yet, but I agree that this seems critical. Le mardi 18 décembre 2018 12:50:44 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Hi Seeing as the freezes are coming up on the buster side, https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html , I have added two (amd64 and i386) buster buildbots. (I mailed Volker and his ssh keys are added.) Regards, Jan On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 11:17, E. Madison Bray wrote: > On Thu, Dec

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:10 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-12-20 00:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > How about trying to get this into 8.5? (or perhaps 8.5.1?) > > Rushing GAP 4.10 in Sage 8.5 doesn't sound like a good idea to me. > Ideally, it should be sufficiently tested in betas.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:01 AM Antonio Rojas wrote: > > > > El martes, 18 de diciembre de 2018, 12:50:44 (UTC+1), E. Madison Bray > escribió: >> >> As pointed out by Samuel last month [1] the transition freeze (i.e. >> new package versions) for the next major Debian release (buster) is >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

On 2018-12-20 00:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote: How about trying to get this into 8.5? (or perhaps 8.5.1?) Rushing GAP 4.10 in Sage 8.5 doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Ideally, it should be sufficiently tested in betas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

El martes, 18 de diciembre de 2018, 12:50:44 (UTC+1), E. Madison Bray escribió: > > As pointed out by Samuel last month [1] the transition freeze (i.e. > new package versions) for the next major Debian release (buster) is > coming up January 12 [2]. This is important for Sage and those >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:56 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > I`ve just given #22626 (port gap/libgap to GAP 4.10) a positive > > review (Erik deserves a round of applause for this great work!) > > And the associated #26856

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I`ve just given #22626 (port gap/libgap to GAP 4.10) a positive > review (Erik deserves a round of applause for this great work!) > And the associated #26856 (gap_packages/database) will be up for > reviewing very soon, > I`m just running

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Same here * 'Martin R' via sage-devel [2018-12-20 00:36:35]: I have very little time, but if someone posts very precise compilation instructions to upgrade from current develop, I would let my computer play with it in the background. (currently compiling 8.5.rc1) In particular: was gap 4.10

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

I have very little time, but if someone posts very precise compilation instructions to upgrade from current develop, I would let my computer play with it in the background. (currently compiling 8.5.rc1) In particular: was gap 4.10 already tested with optional packages like coxeter3 and the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

Well... Gap 4.10 and associated packages are a large change. I can't see it going straight from positive_review to release. Including it would entail at least a 8.5.rc2, and a decent shakedown period. This argues strongly in favor of Volker's suggestion of releasing 8.5 "as is" from 8.5.rc1.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

I`ve just given #22626 (port gap/libgap to GAP 4.10) a positive review (Erik deserves a round of applause for this great work!) And the associated #26856 (gap_packages/database) will be up for reviewing very soon, I`m just running one last round of tests; that is, it should be possible to get GAP

[sage-devel] Re: Delaying 8.5 or fast-tracking 8.6?

I'm inclined to release 8.5 this weekend... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send