Question for humans: I'm planning on merging this into sage so that
other developers can help grow it and it's not just me working on it. Would
it be better to first wait for any bugs that people might notice and then
add it into sage? Or should I just go ahead and start merging it in and any
The next step of integration could be to add this package as an optional
package to Sage, see https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31164
On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 12:04:16 PM UTC-8 Aram Dermenjian wrote:
> As a follow up to this email thread: Everything should be working now. If
>
As a follow up to this email thread: Everything should be working now. If
people want to test it out and/or see if there are any bugs/issues, feel
free to have at it and add any issues into the github.
Question for humans: I'm planning on merging this into sage so that
other developers can help
The master branch has bugs in it and don't produce "correct" oriented
matroids. These have been fixed in the current development branch, but the
development branch needs documentation to be updated and also to be double
checked to ensure there are no bugs/errors. (There's also additional things
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:29 AM Aram Dermenjian
wrote:
>
> There is currently a project that is in progress for getting (usual) oriented
> matroids into sage. It's still a work in progress, but an initial version is
> close to done. (See https://github.com/thecaligarmo/oriented_matroids for the
There is currently a project that is in progress for getting (usual)
oriented matroids into sage. It's still a work in progress, but an initial
version is close to done. (See
https://github.com/thecaligarmo/oriented_matroids for the project) Due to
external time commitments, it hasn't finished as
This is about a recent (2018?) generalisation of oriented matroids. Do we have
anything about the usual oriented matroids?
On 22 November 2023 04:25:34 GMT, 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
wrote:
>Hi John,
> None of the above. I think maintaining good programming practices is
>important
Hi John,
None of the above. I think maintaining good programming practices is
important for the codebase and it is a good thing to teach contributors who
might not understand. Hence, we should spend the time having them get it
into a format that is acceptable for Sage. In the end, it should
