On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 1:44 PM seb@gmail.com
wrote:
> Personally I don't mind if a maintainer would correct my typos in the PR
> description (or something else according to Volker's white list). However,
> since this is a privileged action and we cannot be sure that everyone feels
> this
Personally I don't mind if a maintainer would correct my typos in the PR
description (or something else according to Volker's white list). However,
since this is a privileged action and we cannot be sure that everyone feels
this way, I think this point should be addressed generally. Perhaps the
I agree with both Tobias and Matthias that we should have a discussion
about the roles of maintainers (since they have defined privileges on
github) and changes to Sage's governance model more generally. Martin and
Tobias have commented on trying to include some additional principles into
the
I think it's important to point out that a "Code of Conduct" is merely one
document, of limited scope and purpose.
In particular it does not touch matters of *governance* of a project.
Open source projects with very different governance structures can share
the same Code of Conduct.
Questions
Thanks for working on this, John!
I like that they are aspirational goals, being nice to each other shouldn't
be that hard.
There are always going to be questions "what exactly is now allowed", but
its impossible to enumerate everything. Is it OK to push to somebody else's
branch, or change
I think Martin raises important points and agree that 0-4 should be added
to the code of conduct (more in spirit than in this particular formulation;
for example, I like the proposed reformulations of David). Point 5 is
important as well, but I would say it's enough to spell out the rules
There are suggestions along maybe similar lines at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36844, and I am trying to think of
how we might incorporate your suggestions and the other ones. I've had the
thought before about other documents (like our department's by-laws) that
there should be two
Thank you for the thoughtful reply! You gave me a lot to think about, and
I'll do so over the weekend, rather than rushing.
Best,
Martin
On Friday 1 March 2024 at 18:21:59 UTC+1 David Roe wrote:
> Thank you for starting the conversation Martin. I certainly think that
> all of these
Thank you for starting the conversation Martin. I certainly think that all
of these suggestions are appropriate to discuss, and that sage-devel is
probably a better venue for discussion like this than the PR.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:49 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com>
I would like to ask whether we might want to add some of the following to
the code of conduct, I could not find it covered there.
I admit that it is unclear to me whether the discussion should be on pull
requests only. I don't want to add the following to John's pull request,
because it
10 matches
Mail list logo
