On 10/03/18 11:17, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/10/2018 03:06 AM, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
On 10/03/18 04:59, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 12:53 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLE
I have an Epson SX-425W all-in-one connected over WiFi that I believe
uses the epson2 backend. I have not looked at the code so can't really
say that it would make a good reference apart from the fact that it
works for me.
Andrew
On 23/01/18 01:27, Jimi Damon wrote:
Hi
sys] sanei_genesys_create_gamma_table: size = 256, maximum =
65535, gamma_max = 65535, gamma = 1
[genesys] sanei_genesys_create_gamma_table: completed
[genesys] sanei_genesys_exposure_time2: ydpi=900, step=1, endpixel=44
led=4432, power=0 => exposure=9166
[genesys] calibration_filename: calibration filename
>/ho
Hi All,
I just picked up one of these portable scanners, it works well in
Windows.
In Linux and either xsane or simple-scan however it always scans a
completely black page.
Thinking it was a calibration issue I ran:-
SANE_DEBUG_GENESYS=255 scanimage -d genesys --calibrate 2>calibrate.log
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
>
> On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 22:50 -0700, Andrew Reginato wrote:
> >
> >
> > No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something
> > different,
> > check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
call to aptitude tells me that I have
Version: 1.0.22-7.4
There's your problem, that is too old. I think you need at least 1.0.24.
Andrew
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send
The D8BE0100.local name suggests that it is using mdns AKA bonjour.
nslookup does not do mdns so no surprise that it fails.
Try
$ avahi-resolve --name D8BE0100.local
But it looks like scanimage manages to resolve the name anyway.
Andrew
On 01/07/15 21:09, Balthasar Nebel wrote:
Hi
and 4800dpi working fine on my LiDE 110,
and producing correct (undistorted) aspect ratio.
Andrew
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~akanaber/lide110/
Let me know if there's something else I can do that might help,
Andrew
M G Berberich wrote:
Hello,
Canon LiDE 210 with sane-backends 1.0.24 (libsane:amd64 1.0.24-1.1+b1
from debian testing) has problems with 600 dpi gray and lineart
.ltdl7.x86_64.rpm
if you use RPMs.
You may well need one of the data packages as well from that same
download page.
Andrew
On 04/03/13 22:51, Oliver Schwartz wrote:
Andrew,
What is the current status?
I would call it at least 'Good'. I have used this code to scan over a
hundred negatives. But then only I have used it. Others may want something
else. I am open to adding to it although I would prefer to get
Hi Oliver,
Good to hear from you. I just resent my patch to you.
Andrew
On 25/02/13 08:15, Oliver Schwartz wrote:
Andrew,
I'm sorry, but I haven't received any emails from you lately. The last
message I got from you is from January 26th.
Can you please resent your emails, I'll double
On 25/02/13 08:51, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Andrew, dear Oliver,
why not discuss this publicly on this list too.
1. People having a BenQ ScanWit 2720S might join the discussion and test
the patches too.
2. It is archived too in the case of some hardware failure and missing
backup
On 25/02/13 11:07, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Andrew,
thank you for working on finishing the support.
Am Montag, den 25.02.2013, 10:00 + schrieb Andrew Goodbody:
[?]
What is the current status?
I would call it at least 'Good'. I have used this code to scan over a
hundred negatives
and then possibly
committed. Is anyone in contact with Oliver? Is there someone else who
can look at this patch?
Thanks,
Andrew
or improvement
--Andrew
--
https://launchpad.net/~andymc73
http://blog.oldcomputerjunk.net
Twitter: @andymc73
GPG: http://www.andrewmcdonnell.net/gpg.html
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:48:27 +0930
From: Andrew McDonnell bugs at andrewmcdonnell.net
To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject
at a reduced resolution
* automated negative conversion (this would need to be done in software)
I have been slowly starting to work through the above
hoping I can make a useful contribution,
--Andrew
--
https://launchpad.net/~andymc73
http://blog.oldcomputerjunk.net
Twitter: @andymc73
GPG
developed it against
git://git.debian.org/sane/sane-backends.git and tested on Debian Squeeze using:
./configure --prefix=/home/andrew/opt/sane-1.0.22-git --disable-translations
- - --enable-warnings --disable-avahi --disable-ipv6 --without-snmp
- - --enable-pnm-backend --disable-locking --enable-pthread
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:09 PM, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Le Wednesday 15 September 2010 15:21:06 Andrew Ziem, vous avez ?crit :
...
Hi Stef,
Sorry! I had to do two things to make the shading file
1. I forgot to define DEEP_DEBUG :(
2. I ran the commented-out parts of your shell
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:29 PM, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Le samedi 4 septembre 2010 19:50:48 Andrew Ziem, vous avez ?crit :
I use Fedora 13 (32-bit) with SANE 1.0.21-2 with a Lexmark X1150 (Dell
A920), but I see horizontal bands when scanning with SANE, Xsane, and
GIMP. ?When scanning
I use Fedora 13 (32-bit) with SANE 1.0.21-2 with a Lexmark X1150 (Dell
A920), but I see horizontal bands when scanning with SANE, Xsane, and
GIMP. When scanning in Windows, it looks fine.
Example image (300dpi)
http://a.imageshack.us/img829/943/lexmarkx1150verticalban.png
Andrew
if this code is still available for use and possible
further development? Was some other progress made on this device?
--
Best regards,
Andrew
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc
No windows here, sorry ... Is there any way for dump info from libusb-based
proprietary scanner driver?
Good work, scan at 300 dpi works, scan at 150 dpi just refused to start, will
test 100 dpi after my machine finished some memory-heavy compilation task.
--- On Sun, 2/28/10, stef stef.dev
--- On Sat, 10/3/09, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
From: stef stef.dev at free.fr
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] HP scanjet 2400 question.
To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Saturday, October 3, 2009, 5:02 AM
Le vendredi 2 octobre 2009 23:52:46
Andrew Randrianasulu, vous avez
Hello all!
I just powered up this scanner ( (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard],
product=0x0a01 [hp scanjet scanner], chip=GL646_HP) as detected by
sane-find-scanner). It doesn't work with stock sane (1.0.19), and doesn't work
with genesys backend from http://stef.dev.free.fr/sane/genesys/ (but
sound and flashes some light here,
but it doesn't scan anything)
scanimage: sane_start: Error during device I/O
User defined signal 1
Can anybody provide some help please?
Thank you.
Andrew M. B. Boktor
andrew.botros at gmail.com(Jabber
I've made a British English .po file for the sane-backends package, please
could it be included in the next release? Rather than attaching it to a
mailing list email, it will be hosted for the next few weeks at:
http://cis.strath.ac.uk/~ac/sane-backends.en_GB.po.gz
Thanks,
Andrew
(member
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:20:33PM +0100, Crypto wrote:
What I need is a scanner with a decent ADF and maybe even duplex scanning, so
I thought I should go for the Avision, but I am not completely sure if that
is what I want. I can get a used one for much less ??? than new. I would like
to
that a recent update to autoconf or related tools has removed the
above files.
Has anybody experienced similar problems and, if so, is there an easy
workaround until such time as it can be fixed in a future SANE release?
Thanks,
Andrew
-- next part --
An HTML attachment
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:05:22PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
The behind problem was that the 'groups = yes' option was not
documentation in man saned or the web pages. If this option is not given
xinetd will strip the scanner group and everything seems to be working
but the scaned process
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:51:09AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Hmm. I had something in the back of my head about hpaio...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495005
You're out of luck until the HP folks fix there POS backend.
Why does a backend need saned's open socket fd? Can
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:16:02AM +, Kanito 73 wrote:
Concretely the problem is the device permission, it is set to rw-r--r-- no
matter what permission I set in the udev rules file...
It sounds like your udev rules are wrong somewhere. If your specified
mode is ignored then it may mean
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 04:56:13PM +, Kanito 73 wrote:
Add your username to the 'scanner' group, keep udev and don't touch the
device permissions.
I currently belong to users, root and scanner groups... udev remains
untouched, epson.conf is ok since it works as root, but there's no
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 01:00:02AM +, Kanito 73 wrote:
They only way to recognize the scanner as normal user was setuid to root
scanimage, but it didn't work with xsane throwing an error that GTK does not
allow setuid... so, I want to change permissions by hand and make it
worldwide
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:48:58AM +0200, kid2k4 at email.it wrote:
We need to make a simultaneus scanning job with
2/4 scanners at the same time. How we can make this. It's possible to
make a script (bash?) to automaze all under linux OS.
You need to run the 'scanimage' commands in the
the file, the instructions don't mention this.
--
Andrew.
--
Andrew M. Bishop amb at gedanken.demon.co.uk
http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:08:34AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Nick Andrew nick at nick-andrew.net wrote:
When /dev/null is opened it gets the lowest numbered unopened
file descriptor. If any of the file descriptors 0, 1 or 2 are
closed when the program starts running, the later close
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
why /proc/bus/usb/003/002 is not owned by scanner group?
Because udev only populates /dev, and the udev rules say to make the
group scanner for a scanner device. /proc is populated by the
kernel.
finally, why lsusb does not list
I've got a bit of a problem with saned / sane-net and scanimage
arguments. If I do this on host1 with the scanner attached:
host1$ scanimage -d epson:libusb:002:008 --resolution 150 --mode Color
image.pnm
then it works fine. If I move to host2 and use scanimage to
talk via scand with this
.
Add a test before the close(fd) call to ensure that file
descriptors 0, 1 or 2 are not closed by accident.
Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew nick at nick-andrew.net
---
frontend/saned.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/saned.c b/frontend/saned.c
index
.
Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew nick at nick-andrew.net
---
frontend/saned.c | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/frontend/saned.c b/frontend/saned.c
index 29bf39d..cddd6fa 100644
--- a/frontend/saned.c
+++ b/frontend/saned.c
@@ -2788,8 +2788,20
Andrew andrew2006 at flight.us writes:
The Epson 4490 is not listed on
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-EPSON
Check
http://sane.alioth.debian.org/lists/sane-backends-external.html#S-EPKOWA
instead. It is supported, but on i386 machines only as it requires a
non-free plugin
here know if this model is supported?
If it is not supported, could someone recommend something comparable in price
(this one is $160) AND quality? (I am hearing Epson is the best brand in terms
of linux support and quality)
Thanks
Andrew
PS:
and it seems to
work just as fine as my LiDE 20 did. I didn't see any calibration problems on
sane-backends 1.0.17 (Debian package 1.0.17-1) Nonetheless, I would be
willing to do any testing that would help fix any remaining problems with the
device.
Andrew
.
The traces tend to become very large, so please gzip with highest
compression rate before sending.
Ok; I've got a trace. I'll send it to you off list.
Thanks!
Andrew Walrond
- waiting 3 seconds.
The image is recognisable, but has vertical colour bars all the way across it.
(*For reference, a test scan is attached, so you can see what I mean)
I would dearly love to get this working; Can anyone suggest a way forward?
I'll gladly help/test etc etc.
Thanks!
Andrew
Hello:
I haven't dug too deep, but am I correct that the HP3500c scanjet is
not supported and you require a programmer to contribute?
If so, I will be developing the code on a AMD64, Fedora 4 system.
I may regret this :-), but lets see what I can crank out.
Andrew Allison
, but I don't know if it was that specific instance or the fact
that there were 2 running?
any thoughts?
thanks
Andrew
`canon630u:/dev/usb/scanner0' is a CANON Canoscan FB630U flatbed
scanner
scanimage -d canon630u:/dev/usb/scanner0
scanimage: sane_start: Device busy
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Greg.
Regards,
Andrew Kovacs
that I've
seen nothing on the net about anyone not being able to get one of these
scanners to work, so it must be Mandrake specific.
Regards,
Andrew Kovacs
**
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is
intended
included what I think might help, based on what I've tried and what
I've read in other posts.
Thanks on advance to anyone who's taken the time to go through this, and for
any solutions offered.
Regards,
Andrew Kovacs
I'm using the sane-dmc backend to read from Polaroid DMC cameras
attached to several different machines. Recently one camera can no
longer produce images; scanimage just dies with a Error during device
I/O, and I don't think anything on the machine has changed recently
to trigger this. It fails
Hello! SANE 1.05 and XSANE 0.79 work fine, finally, with one exception. At
the end of a scan, the scan does not end correctly, and waits exactly 10 minutes
to end the scan. After that, the menu functions return. The scan should end
when the physical scan is finished.
Using SCSI Adaptec 2940;
53 matches
Mail list logo
