Hi Aaron,
This seems reasonable to me. It might also be worth adding a similar timeline
to 6.1.1.5.(1) so that, under a circumstance in which the Debian-weak-keys repo
is updated, there is some amount of time for CAs to ensure their own systems
are also updated. Since that repo is under the
Yes, I’m under no illusions I got it right on the first try, and alternative
approaches might be better.
-Tim
From: Clint Wilson
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 2:20 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek ; ServerCert CA/BF
Cc: Roman Fischer
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS
Hi Tim,
> On May 10, 2024, at 8:52 AM, Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg
> wrote:
>
> Whether the comparison should be case sensitive or not is not a question of
> how “strict” the linter should be, but what the requirements are. Linters
> MUST NOT make their own determinations as to what the
On 10/5/2024 6:52 μ.μ., Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg wrote:
Whether the comparison should be case sensitive or not is not a
question of how “strict” the linter should be, but what the
requirements are. Linters MUST NOT make their own determinations as
to what the requirements are, and
Whether the comparison should be case sensitive or not is not a question of how
“strict” the linter should be, but what the requirements are. Linters MUST NOT
make their own determinations as to what the requirements are, and SHOULD
highlight cases like this where ambiguity may be present.
Hi Wendy,
I would definitely go for c) because the documents are overall not standardized
enough to do any kind of automatic parsing where a) or b) would maybe help.
Rgds
Roman
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Wendy
Brown - QT3LB-C via Servercert-wg
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2024 16:58
To:
GDCA votes NO on Ballot SC-74.
Thanks.
From: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Date: 2024-05-05 16:24
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS
structure according to RFC 3647
Voting begins
Kamu SM votes "No" on Ballot SC-74.
Tuğba ÖZCAN
Head Of e-Signature Technologies Department
TÜBİTAK/BİLGEM/Kamu SM
Çamlıca Mahallesi 408. Cadde No: 136
C Blok 5. Kat Yenimahalle/Ankara
Dahili:8543
tugba.oz...@tubitak.gov.tr
Kimden: "CA"
Kime: "Dimitris Zacharopoulos,
JPRS votes NO to Ballot SC-74.
On 2024/05/05 17:24, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg wrote:
Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:
/"The Certificate
