Hi Martijn,
The same Punycode algorithm as defined in RFC 3492 is used by IDNA2003, 2008,
and more to convey Unicode code points in domain labels in a way that conforms
to the LDH syntax. The BRs currently require that any labels that are prefixed
with “xn—” contain valid Punycode-encoded
On 19/3/2024 6:31 μ.μ., Ben Wilson wrote:
Hi Dimitris,
You can add me.
Thanks Ben, Ballot SC-73 has been assigned to address this issue.
Best regards,
Dimitris.
Thanks,
Ben
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 9:01 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
Servercert-wg wrote:
On 19/3/2024
Hi Dimitris,
You can add me.
Thanks,
Ben
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 9:01 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
Servercert-wg wrote:
>
>
> On 19/3/2024 5:27 π.μ., Corey Bonnell wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitris,
>
> I’d be happy to endorse and help flesh out the language.
>
>
> Thank you Corey, I added your
Greetings Antti,
Somehow, our group (working on the Subscriber Agreement/Terms of Use
ballot) had selected ballot number 67 on the wiki, but there were two
different wiki pages with ballot numbers that people were unaware of (which
led to a second selection of #67 by Chris and Ryan). So Dustin,
On 19/3/2024 5:27 π.μ., Corey Bonnell wrote:
Hi Dimitris,
I’d be happy to endorse and help flesh out the language.
Thank you Corey, I added your name on the table with future ballots. Is
there anyone else?
Best regards,
Dimitris.
Thanks,
Corey
*From:*Servercert-wg *On Behalf
Of
Hi Chris,
On 18/3/2024 5:32 μ.μ., Chris Clements via Servercert-wg wrote:
Intellectual Property (IP) Disclosure:
- While not a Server Certificate Working Group Member, researchers
from Princeton University presented at Face-to-Face 58, provided
academic expertise, and highlighted
Hi Antti,
The ballot number seems to be ok.
Check out
https://wiki.cabforum.org/books/server-certificate-wg/page/scwg-ballots-wuG
It looks like Ben and Dustin need to get a new number and add a row to
the corresponding table.
Thanks,
Dimitris.
On 19/3/2024 7:19 π.μ., Backman, Antti
All,
We’ve recently become aware that some CAs have issued certificates containing
punycode encoded domain labels compatible with IDNA2008, that are not
compatible with IDNA2003.
Our own interpretation is that IDNA2008 is currently not permitted. While the
LDH, Non-Reserved LDH and XN
