If using F16/Alpha/RC4/live for install to harddisk, (I selected an
extended partition for that), the installer fails on writing bootloader
to partititon, so I can't boot that installed F16. See BZ 730915).
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
If using F16/Alpha/RC4/live for install to harddisk, (I selected an
extended partition for that), the installer fails on writing bootloader
to partititon, so I can't boot that installed F16. See BZ 730915).
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
I don't know how Steve's tests behave, but:
1. We can't run destructive tests (uninstalling packages, deleting
system
files, stopping services).
All are read only. I have several more that do stuff like start each
servoce and scan
the audit logs for AVCS, then stop all services. But
Also, need a tag for 16-Alpha in bugzilla,
for auto reporting of tracebacks.
Not sure what you mean by that.
That's this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730887
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
should be alpha blockers.
727966 requires custom layout, which makes it Final, not Alpha. 723167
is supposed to be
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:06, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
should be alpha blockers.
727966
Compose started at Tue Aug 16 13:15:36 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
On 08/16/2011 11:12 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:06, Clyde E. Kunkelclydekunkel7...@cox.net
wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167
I've just tried F16 alpha rc4. Installation went without a hitch but
unfortunately the system still hangs when grub tries to boot. BZ#
730124.
Any pointer how to get past this would be appreciated.
Jurgen
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 10:06 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
should be alpha blockers.
727966 requires custom
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:28 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
I'm not saying everything is a blocker--only the inability to install
the DVD. Heck, you can't even boot a desktop spin that has been
installed due to grub2 errors and since there is a good workaround for
that it isn't a blocker.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Tim Flink wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:10:27 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote:
snip
It is my understanding that the majority of desktop machines run
Nvidia or ATI graphics cards.
It is a fact of life that Gnome 3 in its present incarnation will
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.9.6. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.9
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.1, the 389-ds-base package is included in the base
OS. It is the same as the
On 08/16/2011 01:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 10:06 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
should be
Hi,
booting the 32 Bit Gnome Live CD drops to textmode.
blockdev
invalid format on line 1 of table on stdin
command failes
Usage: blockdev -v -q .
invalid format on line 1 of table on stdin
command failes
ln: failes to create symbolic link '/dev/root': File exists
dracut Wanung:
On 08/16/2011 01:16 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
I've just tried F16 alpha rc4. Installation went without a hitch but
unfortunately the system still hangs when grub tries to boot. BZ#
730124.
Any pointer how to get past this would be appreciated.
Jurgen
If you have another installation you
Ahead of an RC5 release, I created an unofficial netinstall iso with
the new libreport and anaconda builds.
* http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso
* http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso.sha256
If anyone has the time and inclination to test that boot.iso and,
assuming
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:38:35 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
Ahead of an RC5 release, I created an unofficial netinstall iso with
the new libreport and anaconda builds.
* http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso
* http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso.sha256
I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
I hope it is packaged and updated totally differently
from the version in ubuntu, because the ubuntu
version is a nightmare.
Do we still have to edit random files then run
update-grub to build the actual
Hey, folks. Just a quick heads-up to expect F16 Alpha RC5 within the
next hour or two. We have the go/no-go meeting (again) tomorrow so we're
really squeezed for time in validating this, if people could help out
with testing that'd be great. The official announcement on test-announce
will have all
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 15:50, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
This is widely off-topic and not written in a manner that really
allows for either a conversation or a poor response. Here is a
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
I hope it is packaged and updated totally differently
from the version in ubuntu, because the ubuntu
version is a nightmare.
#232: Virtualization Test Day
--+-
Reporter: jforbes | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Yeah. That's right. I'm psyched to have this in fedora.
This will hopefully allow fedora to deal with GPT in a saner and
more-up-to-date way, thus resolving many bugzilla reports.
Including some of the interoperability issues with fedora/mac dual boot.
Yay.
-benjamin
--
test mailing list
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Are there any new grub2-related kickstart settings for the bootloader
line in kickstart?
For example, I installed F16 through kickstart yesterday with
vga=794, which adds it to the linux ... line. I get correct
resolution but I also get a boot message that using vga=... is
deprecated and that
**IMPORTANT** : The next Fedora 16 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting is in less
than 24 hours - Wednesday, August 17, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00
PDT) so the Alpha test cases (see below) would need to be done by then.
Thanks.
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5
(RC5)
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:09:20 -0400
Tom H wrote:
(In defense of Ubuntu, it's just using the upstream way, just as
Debian - and even Fedora - does when you use
grub-mkconfig/grub2-mkconfig.)
I know, that's why I suspect that same horror will be
perpetrated in fedora 16.
--
test mailing list
On 2011/08/16 19:21 (GMT-0400) Benjamin Kosnik composed:
Yeah. That's right. I'm psyched to have this in fedora.
Not me.
This will hopefully allow fedora to deal with GPT in a saner and
more-up-to-date way, thus resolving many bugzilla reports.
But you get a vastly larger set of bugs with
Thanks Andre! So far RC5 works fine for me, it fixes the selinux issue
on x86_64[1] and saving traceback to bugzilla problem[2]. So anyone
wants to try it, go ahead and help testing!
Thanks!
Hurry
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730863
[2]
Hello everyone,
I saw Fedora 16 Alpha RC5 LXDE and XFCE live isos don't have
libreport-plugin-bugzilla and libreort-plugin-logger so that you cannot select
report methods in the SELinux Alert Browser.
It would be nice to be installed by default in both live images.
# Gnome and KDE live isos
**IMPORTANT** : The next Fedora 16 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting is in less
than 24 hours - Wednesday, August 17, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00
PDT) so the Alpha test cases (see below) would need to be done by then.
Thanks.
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5
(RC5)
32 matches
Mail list logo
