Hi,
Many thanks. I tried and tested it. It works fine for small chunks of data
(I can see SMS going out of bbox in a sequence they were entered in
send_sms table). However, for large amount of data (e.g. I sent a bulk of
20k SMS via SQLBOX), it does not follow the same rule. Is it bearerbox
which
For priority I'd suggest adding a column called priority (typically
int(3) integer between 0 and 999) and doing ORDER by that column.
Do not forget to add an index as well or it might slow things down!
2013/11/12 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk:
Hi,
Many thanks. I tried and tested it. It works
Dear Khan,
I just tried your insert query and it worked for me.
I got both the dlr-status = 8 and the dlr-status = 1.
Maybe your Trans001 smsc doesn’t support delivery reports to that destination.
=+= Rene
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Willy Mularto
Get a copy of the user guide in the doc directory of opensmppbox.
Maybe you need to do a make docs first.
== Rene
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Alok Srivastava
Sent: donderdag 31 oktober 2013 7:00
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: opensmpp
dear list
plz help,
Yes, it is binfo.
For incoming messages, use %B in your get-url.
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Mohammed Saleem
Sent: dinsdag 29 oktober 2013 20:44
To: Manuel García Cabrera
Cc: kannel-users MailingList
Subject: Re: Manipulating service-type
Sorry it is binfo
It should route automatically.
Could you share your logs?
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Amir Mahmoud
Sent: maandag 28 oktober 2013 20:38
To: users
Subject: Routing DLR to ESME using OpenSMPPBox
Dears,
I have configured my servers to send from ESME to SMSC
On server 1, use group = smsbox-route with smsbox id set to the system-id
(or system-type) of the 1 = 2 connection.l
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of michael osakede
Sent: woensdag 23 oktober 2013 15:18
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Help Routing from Bearerbox to
The system type is case sensitive.
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of michael osakede
Sent: woensdag 23 oktober 2013 13:41
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: OPENSMPP LOGIN ISSUE
Hi,
I am having issues login into my opensmppbox from a remote kannel gateway.
This
Please share your logs.
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Kelechi Micheals
Sent: woensdag 16 oktober 2013 13:00
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Sms reply.
Dear friends,
I have a working system. It recieves sms and processes well. However I
noticed for every sms the
Use binfo=CTEST
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Luis Cavazos
Sent: donderdag 3 oktober 2013 18:26
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Service type parameter on URL
Hello,
Im already working with kannel, but a new Operator has requested to send the
service-type
Sounds like a memory leak somewhere to me. And/or maybe a race condition.
Maybe you can run one time with valgrind running?
== Rene
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Minh Tuan
Sent: zaterdag 28 september 2013 5:22
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: opensmppbox
See group = smsbox-route in the user manual.
-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of iqbal
Sent: maandag 23 september 2013 11:02
To: 'Kannel Users'
Subject: smsbox-id
Hi All,
i got sqlbox that running well, it can return dlr-url by putting
Actually, if my understanding is correct (i.e. SQLBOX is already doing the
right thing by giving messages in FIFO order to bbox, but bbox is shuffling
the outgoing messages from within its buffer), then there is no point of
adding priority column.
What do you say?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:28
There's a 'priority' field in the Msg structure.
I think it serves for the purpose that you want to.
Just it's you cannot set it in the send_sms table. Not sure why, but
probably the field was added later.
It shouldn't be difficult to add though if anyone wants to send in a patch.
== Rene
But having said the below, sms messages are not guaranteed to arrive in a
particular order.
The remote smsc may still send out message 2 first, even when they received
message 1 first.
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen
Sent: dinsdag 12 november 2013 15:35
This is OK if SMSC does the re-ordering for congestion or some other
reasons. But my concern is that messages should at least leave bbox in the
same order by which they left the application.
Since kannel is not giving me a proper method to sequence the messages, I
am forced to use SLEEP method in
Do you see the dlr coming in, in your bearerbox logs?
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen
Sent: dinsdag 12 november 2013 14:58
To: 'Willy Mularto'; 'خان ابو زید'
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: DLR NOT UPDATED
Dear Khan,
I just tried your insert
If you are going to fiddle with your php code anyhow.
A possible solution is to send message 2 whenever the dlr with status = 8
arrives.
You don't need a sleep then and you will be sure that the message has been
sent out before sending the next one.
Just an idea.
== Rene
From:
Yup, I have tried this already. But enabling DLR with remote SMSC comes at
the cost of reducing the overall SMS sending speed by half. Meaning, if I
have a bandwidth of 100 SMS/sec, enabling DLR will actually give me 50
SMS/sec effective speed, with remaining speed being taken by DLRs.
Hi,
In high traffic conditions, I am often getting this error in smsbox logs:
2013-11-12 20:03:18 SMS HTTP-request sender:+X request: 'Service
not found.' url: '' reply: -1 ''
While the service is very much in place and working for small traffic
loads, I need to understand what's going
Just an idea ...
Detach the sms process from the apache or HTTP connections.
In other words, change your php script to a daemon that keeps running on
the background. Then queue your http request into a table and use the
daemon to scan that that table and process the request.
You can easily do
20k SMS will take few seconds then why worry about the sequence since DLR is
not available and operator is not going to obey your sequnce/order at all.
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: ha...@aeon.pk
Date:12/11/2013 8:03 PM (GMT+05:00)
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc:
Hello Rene,
Thanks a lot for you reply.
below is my configuration files followed by sample of the logs, please let
me know for any further details.
*Configuration Files*
*1)**Kannel.conf*
#-
# core setup
group = core
admin-port = 13000
Also: If you are just enabling dlr = 8 and not dlr = 1, then it is not going
to take any bandwidth with your provider.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: Ghulam Mustafa /HQ/NW/Network Engineer [mailto:g.must...@nadra.gov.pk]
Sent: dinsdag 12 november 2013 16:53
To: ha...@aeon.pk; Rene
Are there even any entries in your dlr table? They should have accumulated
by now.
What is the sql type of your ts and destination field? Is it at least 12
characters or more?
== Rene
From: Amir Mahmoud [mailto:amir.mahm...@egyptlinx.com]
Sent: dinsdag 12 november 2013 17:25
To: Rene
20k is just an example batch I am trying to play around in order to find
the solution. My actual bulk is in millions.
As for sequence, the application logic is such that it should first send an
intro message to the user and then send the actual content message. The
intro message has to go before
Set 'max-messages = 0' in your sms-service group (the one which contains
the keyword mapping to incoming traffic).
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
Please share your logs.
*From:* users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On Behalf Of *Kelechi
Can you explain your scenario with an example please? Would be easier to
understand what you need.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Porter, Kelvin kelvin.por...@h3net.comwrote:
Hi,
I am writing to insure that I have not overlooked an option. In my
application, I have a need to specify
Please check if your VPN with the service provider goes down at the same
time when this issue comes.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Stefan Gromoll ste...@gromoll.org wrote:
Hello,
We're having a problem with one of our Kannel binds. Kannel establishes a
connection to a carrier and sends
Hi,
The scenario is the following...
I have customers that are sending HTTP requests to the SMSBox instance to
initiate the sending of MT messages. Depending on the intended destination of
those messages (i.e., the to/receiver number), I need to direct the message to
one set of SMSC links
The table is empty, and the type of both ts and destination columns is
varchar(40)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
Are there even any entries in your dlr table? They should have accumulated
by now.
What is the sql type of your ts and destination
Have you tried allowed-smsc-id and denied-smsc-id parameters in group=smsc?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Porter, Kelvin kelvin.por...@h3net.comwrote:
Hi,
The scenario is the following…
I have customers that are sending HTTP requests to the SMSBox instance to
initiate the sending
Hi
Can't you split your batchs into intro and content messages? Then you
can send all your intros and once they are gone send the content
message.
Another option can be to concatenate them so the phone will reassemble
the message in the correct order.
Just a couple of ideas.
Regards
Alvaro
Hi,
I did some looking and it appears that I might be able to accomplish what I
want using allowed- and/or denied-prefix. The description is a bit ambiguous
though, these variables determines whether a SMS message can be sent through.
The routing is unclear as to whether the prefix filtering
I am currently doing the same separate bulks thing, i.e. First running
intro bulk and waiting for bbox to clear (painfully manual), and then
triggering the content bulk. It is pretty tedious process where I have to
manually sit and watch when the first batch is cleared and then trigger the
second
I used it long time ago. Cannot recall how exactly I did that. But you need
some sort of REGEX combination to route SMS to certain SMSCs, and then
putting allowed/denied parameters in place as well.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Porter, Kelvin kelvin.por...@h3net.comwrote:
Hi,
I did
*unsubscribe*;
No i don't, how could i troubleshoot the dlr record insertion to know
whether the problem is related to the insertion or not ?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
Then the problem seems to be whilst inserting the messages into the dlr
table.
Do you
Use forced-smsc in group=sendsms-user
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: ha...@aeon.pk
Date:12/11/2013 11:09 PM (GMT+05:00)
To: Porter, Kelvin
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: SMSC-ID routing based on to/from on SMSBox?
I used it long time ago. Cannot recall
Yes, see user-guide, there is allowed-prefix and allowed-prefix-regex
directives, as well as denied-prefix and denied-prefix-regex.
You can define per smsc.
2013/11/6 michael osakede ire...@yahoo.com:
Hi,
is there anyway to set allowed-shortcode or receiver-prefic for an smsc?
Regards,
Connection reset by peer -- usually means connection was abrupted by
either bearerbox or remote side.
It's weird because the only time I saw kannel shutting down smsc
connection if there is login problem (i.e. bad credentials - it won't
reconnect automatically).
Other than that it should try
2013/11/12 ha...@aeon.pk ha...@aeon.pk:
This is OK if SMSC does the re-ordering for congestion or some other
reasons. But my concern is that messages should at least leave bbox in the
same order by which they left the application.
Since kannel is not giving me a proper method to sequence the
Thanks Rene for the reply.
Here is the valgrind running result. Actully i blind with this .
minhtuan@han-vasplatform-02:/etc/kannel$ sudo valgrind --tool=memcheck
--leak-check=full opensmppbox
==29801== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==29801== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian
43 matches
Mail list logo
