>>
> >>>> my newborn interest is already over.
> >>>
> >>> Well, we do try to support a few of them in the Mobility SIG
> >>>
> >>>>>> I'm also interested to find a tablet where I can install
> >>>&
in the Mobility SIG
I'm also interested to find a tablet where I can install
Fedora,but that tablet should be based on ARM.
https://pine64.com/product-category/tablets/
We will try to support these, when they start sending them out.
Allan.
Hi Allen,
Awesome!
The pine64 is an ARM tablet
do try to support a few of them in the Mobility SIG
> >
> >>>> I'm also interested to find a tablet where I can install
> >>>> Fedora,but that tablet should be based on ARM.
> >
> > https://pine64.com/product-category/tablets/
> >
> >
On 5/11/23 15:35, Allan via users wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2023 18:51:54 +0200
Mario Marietto wrote:
"We don't directly support devices such as phones and tablets, but
it's not to say that without the required kernel/bootloader they
don't work; it's just not our primary focus"
On Mon, 8 May 2023 18:51:54 +0200
Mario Marietto wrote:
> "We don't directly support devices such as phones and tablets, but
> it's not to say that without the required kernel/bootloader they
> don't work; it's just not our primary focus"
>
> my newborn interest is a
On May 8, 2023, at 01:52, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:Hi All,I ask this every so often.Anyone know of any x86_64 Fedora Tablets out there?I’ve test-driven a Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga, which can be folded into a tablet mode as well as a more traditional laptop mode. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mario Marietto wrote:
>
> I dont hide my interest for the installation of fedora on the jetson nano. I
> would like to see what will work and what not. If I can have a fully and more
> modern os than ubuntu 18.04.
You should join fedora-arm. The jetson nano has
/23 09:51, Mario Marietto wrote:
> > "We don't directly support devices such as phones and tablets, but it's
> > not to say that without the required kernel/bootloader they don't work;
> > it's just not our primary focus"
> >
> > my newborn interest
On 5/8/23 09:51, Mario Marietto wrote:
"We don't directly support devices such as phones and tablets, but it's
not to say that without the required kernel/bootloader they don't work;
it's just not our primary focus"
my newborn interest is already over.
U. I see
"We don't directly support devices such as phones and tablets, but it's not
to say that without the required kernel/bootloader they don't work; it's
just not our primary focus"
my newborn interest is already over.
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:35 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, May
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 8:34 AM Mario Marietto wrote:
>
> I'm also interested to find a tablet where I can install Fedora,but that
> tablet should be based on ARM.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM#Supported_Hardware_and_Devices
You might also join the fedora-arm mailing list.
>
>> I ask this every so often.
>>
>> Anyone know of any x86_64 Fedora Tablets out there?
>>
>
> I have Fedora installed on a MS Surface GO 2 (now obsolete, the 3 is out)
> but it "mostly works fine".
>
> It runs faster than Windows 10 on the G
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 12:52 AM ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I ask this every so often.
>
> Anyone know of any x86_64 Fedora Tablets out there?
>
I have Fedora installed on a MS Surface GO 2 (now obsolete, the 3 is out)
b
Hi All,
I ask this every so often.
Anyone know of any x86_64 Fedora Tablets out there?
Many thanks,
-T
--
~~
When you say, "I wrote a program that
crashed Windows," people just stare at
you blankly and say, "Hey, I got those
with the s
On 7/26/19 1:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 7/26/19 1:07 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/25/19 3:50 AM, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo via users wrote:
I am looking for drawing / graphic tablets that works well with
Linux, specifically Fedora, and not expensive. So far I am looking
into some models
On 7/26/19 1:07 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/25/19 3:50 AM, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo via users wrote:
I am looking for drawing / graphic tablets that works well with
Linux, specifically Fedora, and not expensive. So far I am looking
into some models:
- Parblo A640
- GAOMON S620
- VEIKK S640
On 7/25/19 3:50 AM, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo via users wrote:
I am looking for drawing / graphic tablets that works well with Linux,
specifically Fedora, and not expensive. So far I am looking into some
models:
- Parblo A640
- GAOMON S620
- VEIKK S640
- XP-Pen StarG640
- Huion H640P
I
-screen laptops. However, the question is
about pen drawing tablets anyway, not touch screens.
Maybe it is just the arm images. Repeatedly told no support for the
various armv7 based tablets. Only case where I have been looking at
tablets. So I just got a couple wires crossed, as the reason I
is about pen
drawing tablets anyway, not touch screens.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code
My understanding is that there is no touch screen support in Fedora.
You will have to go to a different distro.
I don't know what they are doing right now in Rawhide.
On 7/25/19 3:50 AM, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo via users wrote:
Hi!
I am looking for drawing / graphic tablets that works well
Hi!
I am looking for drawing / graphic tablets that works well with
Linux, specifically Fedora, and not expensive. So far I am
looking into some models:
- Parblo A640
- GAOMON S620
- VEIKK S640
- XP-Pen StarG640
- Huion H640P
Any thought?
Thanks!
--
(stephan paul
Mike Wright writes:
On 5/5/19 9:54 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm tasked with finding a drawing tablet. From what I found, Wacom tablets
seem to have best support, but all references I found were for the gnome-
control-center's wacom settings.
What about XFCE. Are there any Wacom tablet
On 5/5/19 9:54 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm tasked with finding a drawing tablet. From what I found, Wacom
tablets seem to have best support, but all references I found were for
the gnome-control-center's wacom settings.
What about XFCE. Are there any Wacom tablet models that do not require
Allegedly, on or about 5 May 2019, Sam Varshavchik sent:
> Are there any Wacom tablet models that do not require
> configuring under Gnome, and will work on a stock XFCE desktop.
Quite some time ago I'd played with a couple of old Wacom USB drawing
tablets. They all worked without any d
I'm tasked with finding a drawing tablet. From what I found, Wacom tablets
seem to have best support, but all references I found were for the
gnome-control-center's wacom settings.
What about XFCE. Are there any Wacom tablet models that do not require
configuring under Gnome, and will work
Additionally, my daily driver is a Lenovo X200 Tablet. It's a really nice
machine in my opinion, perhaps you'd like it as well.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 3:18 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:54:18 PM EST ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Any sign of Fedora on a tablet?
>
Not really a tablet, but I run Fedora 29 silverblue on a Lenovo Yoga and
the touchscreen is working
Hi,
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:54:18 PM EST ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Any sign of Fedora on a tablet?
I've been working on Linux/Fedora Bay- and Cherry-Trail based
hardware support for the last year or so.
The current state of this is pretty good. If you are interested
in
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:54:18 PM EST ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any sign of Fedora on a tablet?
>
> -T
Yes, but it depends on what you're going for. For example, I toyed around with
Fedora on a Bay Trail tablet a few years ago, and it was fine after a few
patches. Not
I had once seen a YouTube video of someone running Fedora using the
GNome interface, but that was a while ago, I don't know if anyone's
tried getting it on there recently.
EGO II
On 1/22/19 10:54 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Any sign of Fedora on a tablet?
-T
Hi All,
Any sign of Fedora on a tablet?
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
I myself would be happier with a real community-developed tablet OS than the
current somewat open source Andoid. And of course I'm curious to see wether
the new ideas from Gnome 3 actually work (or not) on a real tablet, instead
of a touch-enabled PC.
me too!!
Now im trying to install linux
-enabled PC.
Now that ARM is a primary architecture for Fedora, maybe the developers
could think about a tablet spin or even an installer on Google Play.
Nowadays there a lot of very cheap tablets, cheaper than a Kindle Fire
or a Google Nexus, but with nice specs for hacking. I m positively
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with using graphics tablets
in Fedora?? How is the hardware support? What programs do you use them
in and how well does it work? I use Fedora 14 myself, and do quite a lot
of sketching, so I am considering buying one.
Note that I am
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:01:34 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk christopher.svanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with using graphics tablets
in Fedora?? How is the hardware support? What programs do you use them
in and how well does it work? I use
On 06/14/2011 04:38 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:01:34 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk christopher.svanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with using graphics tablets
in Fedora?? How is the hardware support? What programs do you use them
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Christopher Svanefalk
christopher.svanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with using graphics tablets
in Fedora?? How is the hardware support? What programs do you use them
in and how well does it work?
A friend
On 3/29/11, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
Or not. People who make decisions in IT departments on which OS to run
on their servers are hopefully not basing those decisions on who's
supplying the OS for their
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you checked the financial health of Novell and Red Hat recently?
I'm not sure Red Hat would like to be anywhere near where Novell is...
Andras, you must have reading problems. I was citing Novell not as an
example of
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
Novell has a sever OS lead,
Sorry I meant had.
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 3/29/11, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you checked the financial health of Novell and Red Hat recently?
I'm not sure Red Hat would like to be anywhere near where Novell is...
Andras, you must have reading
the work would be mostly
packaging and buying one of each of these popular tablets and find
what devices-features might need tweaking or drivers (say, for
accelerometers).
Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 15:20 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
What is the commercial reason to do this then? I understand what -you-
want - but redhat needs to have a business reason to leverage this -
like RHEL derives from fedora ...
Unless there's a rational business plan it makes no sense
as you'll probably need a lot of
one off driver/kernel bits and customisation per board).
The Debian folks run on one of the tablets already.
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is a huge
opportunity for Redhat to go after the mobile device market. Just look
at the success of Android. A lot of players in the mobile market would
love to partner with someone other than Google.
I
. Fedora should test and build Fedora
based firmware images that can be downloaded and flashed by users on
popular ARM based tablets.
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:15:51 -0600,
Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
Well... given the demise of Meego, more or less, and the pending demise
of Symbian and the fact that Nokia just signed a deal with the software
devil to use Windows on their handsets, I think there is a huge
with Fedora pre-installed.
Not exactly. Re-read what I said. Fedora should test and build Fedora
based firmware images that can be downloaded and flashed by users on
popular ARM based tablets.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F13-ARM-Beta1 by non
other than Redhats Rex Dieter
-installed.
Not exactly. Re-read what I said. Fedora should test and build Fedora
based firmware images that can be downloaded and flashed by users on
popular ARM based tablets.
The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
commercial backing and a business plan
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
commercial backing and a business plan. It is not a market where a
volunteer community can easily thrive in. It requires custom built
kernels
a bit, really) to
start making hardware with Fedora pre-installed.
Not exactly. Re-read what I said. Fedora should test and build Fedora
based firmware images that can be downloaded and flashed by users on
popular ARM based tablets.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F13-ARM-Beta1
On 03/28/2011 11:35 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
commercial backing and a business plan. It is not a market where a
volunteer community can easily
Ubuntu does ARM right now.
Ubuntu has a netbook version.
Ubuntu has Unity.
http://www.canonical.com/engineering-services/oem-services/why-ubuntu/products
If Redhat isn't going to cater to this market, I have a feeling someone
else will.
Its great that Redhat focuses on its markets, but I
.
Fedora is whatever the community makes it - but if you want to make it
something then you have to actually go *do* something rather than talk
about how it should be done.
The Debian ARM port to one of the older Android tablets was I believe a
one person job, a one person *doing* not *talking* job
as far as
tablets are concerned helps Red Hat and its profits exactly HOW?.
Fedora is whatever the community makes it - but if you want to make it
something then you have to actually go *do* something rather than talk about
how it should be done.
Look, this is a mailing list. I can talk about
On 3/28/11, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
In which way can porting Fedora/RH to run on tables contributes to
MAKING A LOSS or NOT generating a profit?.
By having to pay people, infrastructure, whatever.
In fact, having people talk about your brand/name creates mindshare,
and thus
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
Or not. People who make decisions in IT departments on which OS to run
on their servers are hopefully not basing those decisions on who's
supplying the OS for their gadgets.
Exactly, that must be why Novell never lost any
do you think
guys, shall we dance?
Cheers,
Zoltan
Nokia employee
Fedora Ambassador
2011/3/25 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 19:55 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I really, really would like to see RedHat putting some effort into
seeing Fedora running on modern tablets
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 10:06 +0100, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
Hey Guys,
I think we have a bunch of opportunity. We have free different UI's,
we had once the OpenMoko (and the full documentation still exists) -
and even we could try to run a full gnome 3 on mobile UI. After I have
seen many
the Red Hat and Fedora names
associated with bleeding edge stuff namely, tablets.
It doesn´t have to be a commercial product, because if it becomes one
it´ll be immediately subject to the press and the pundits labeling it
a failure or compare it to the established Android OS.
This positioning is key
it to the established Android OS.
..
The way I dream it, a Fedora Tablet Edition would allow downloading
it and reflashing the OS on popular tablets (Samsung´s Galaxy Tab, the
HP TouchPad, or the RIM´s Playbook), and replace it with Fedora
Tablet Edition. As is of course.
What is the commercial
and the windows software ecosystem.
Specially if the required investment is relatively minuscule, compared
to the firm´s overall R+D budget. I´m not talking about porting Fedora
to ARM. That´s been already done, so the work would be mostly
packaging and buying one of each of these popular tablets and find
what
I'm not familiar with modern tablets. I only own a 4 years old Nokia
N800, -which is more like a larger Linux PDA used sideways- before the
tablets market and craze even existed.
So, I'm not sure about what media the OS stored in on modern Android
tablets. Do those feature flash memory chips
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 19:55 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I really, really would like to see RedHat putting some effort into
seeing Fedora running on modern tablets...
+1 on this. Especially now that I have lost all confidence in Meego
and Google seems to share less and less of Android
64 matches
Mail list logo
