[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2024-05-20 Thread perper
Hello, I used a yml file that is attached to the first message in this thread. That YML used to work with UHD 4.3. Wade’s version has some additional parts in descriptions of radios:\ ctrl_clock: _device_.rfnoc_ctrl\ timebase_clock: _device_.radio and changes in clk_domains (names of clocks

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2024-05-06 Thread Wade Fife
Hi Sebastian, You might be using an old YAML file and tring to apply it to a new version of UHD. Take a look at the YAML file for the version of the FPGA closest to what you want. For example, here's the default X410 image in UHD 4.6:

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2024-05-06 Thread ettus
Hello Piotr, hello everybody, i am working with the USRP X410 as well and want to get the FFT Block to work in RFNoC. I have tried to use the yml as it is, but the Plausibility check failed, which i could resolve by editing the line 143 “dram” -> “dram0”. I guess this was a typo. After 2 h

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2023-01-15 Thread perper
Hi, After sending signal to the device and setting a proper carrier frequency (1GHz\ in this case) I can confirm that it works. To summarize I attach the working\ python script and screenshot of a figure that is drawn by the script. Thank you Rob for the idea. It should be very useful for

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2023-01-12 Thread Rob Kossler
Hi Piotr, One method that may be useful to you for debugging is to create an RFNoC graph with just one block, the FFT (no radio or DDC) and then configure a Tx streamer and Rx streamer from the host to send and receive data from this single block. Rob On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:17 PM wrote: >

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2023-01-11 Thread perper
Hi Wade, After applying your trick I get data flowing to the PC! The version of UHD that I used was 4.3. A quick test shown that the received values are all zeros \ \- without any signal at the input and without setting proper carrier frequency.\ I need to dig into that. But having any samples

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2023-01-11 Thread Rob Kossler
Hi Wade, I thought that the recent changes regarding atomic_item_size would eliminate the need for the user to configure spp for the case of the FFT (and perhaps all cases). Is that true? If so, what is the UHD version needed for this functionality - UHD 4.2? Rob On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:15 PM

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC FFT block on X410

2023-01-10 Thread Wade Fife
One trick with the FFT block I think is that the packet size needs to match the FFT size. Try something like: radio = uhd.rfnoc.RadioControl(graph.get_block("0/Radio#0")) radio.set_properties("spp=" + str(fft_size)) Wade On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 12:11 PM Piotr Krysik wrote: > Hello, > > Does