Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Jan McLaughlin
At first blush, was thinking that Xacti HD cameras that record to SD memory cards would prove an interesting solution. Mailing you the SD cards shouldn't be too much of a problem. Very small. Perhaps TOO small? Problem with all of this - regardless of what camera you choose - will be getting

Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Deirdre Straughan
Could someone send or (better) let me download a small sample of Xacti MP4 video so I can see whether I can work with it with my current software? On Dec 10, 2007 1:43 PM, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At first blush, was thinking that Xacti HD cameras that record to SD memory

Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Deirdre Straughan
Do the Xactis also fall into the category of does not perform well in low light? cause our lighting situations tend to pretty much suck... (people want the room lights low so they can see the presentation slides better - http://blogs.sun.com/storage/en_US/entry/what_we_re_watching_brian is fairly

Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Sull
here is a music video that supposedly was shot solely with the xacti hd1000: http://www.sanyohd1000.com/ here are some hd700 samples that someone posted up: http://gallery.mac.com/crosby007#gallery This is someone else who posted a few low-light samples from HD1000:

Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Sull
The xacti cameras vary in their ability to shoot in low-light but generally speaking they are not ideal for this. You can get good results by changing white balance and iso but it sounds like you need something that can more consistently handle low-light well so a larger quality lens should be

Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Brian Richardson - WhatTheCast?
I'm always very biased towards tapes ... Less compression than flash/DVD camcorders, easier to archive footage than hard disks, cheaper media than DVD camcorders, easy to trade footage, fewer strange file formats to confound your editing software. A tape camcorder can be converted to a hard

Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Deirdre Straughan
My instinct is to agree with you, but in a spirit of correct spending of the company budget, I'm looking at the alternatives. Raymond, the footage you sent that you said is at the highest possible quality setting, how many minutes per GB can you record at that setting? The reviews also talk

RE: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD?

2007-12-10 Thread Kfir Pravda
*sent from handheld Kfir Pravda -Original Message- From: Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: 11-Dec-07 4:34 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] your thoughts on tapes vs HD? My instinct is to agree with you, but in a spirit of correct spending