so does choosing one format affect your rating on the web? For popularity sake?
If I choose 640 x 480 quicktime alone, is this better than choosing multiple
sizes and
extentions. .move, flv, tec, etc.
Will my rating be better on the web using only one size and file extention.
Daryl
--- In
if I chose .QuickTime what primary directories would I limit myself from?
if I chose .swf what primary directories would I limit myself from?
Daryl
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, I thought this was a brilliant post, Gena.
We should save cool
IMHO, don't listen to Apple or Microsoft or Adobe when picking your
format. They want you to believe there is a standard format, that's
how they make money, but it isn't the case.
There is no one holy grail video format on the web. There is no MP3 of
video presently. To reach the most people you
Hi everyone:
On 4/14/07, Daryl Urig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the sound track, a one minute movie 133 megs.
I am using 16 bit color
44 khz 16 bit sterio.
It is a 640 wide so it can be used with apple tv.
Is this a little large?
Yes. The standard resolution for ANY videoblog should be
I am confused. Can someone read my setting's below in previous question osted?
I am told apple tv is: 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec.,
and I am also told this:
Yes. The standard resolution for ANY videoblog should be 320x240.
Anything else and you're really making it rather difficult for those
of
Ok, Let me take a shot at this. You can have any size you want. If
you want to post postage size video that is fine. The following
pertains to vlogs, web video and video on the Internet.
Back in the day when more folks were on dial-up you had to balance
many factors such as the dimensions, file
this is very helpful.
And I see we have choices because of our history.
But in the apple tv column, something made sence. If you keep your file to one
size fits all,
it will help your rating's verses, splitting it up with different versions for
every different
user.
So what version whould
Wow, I thought this was a brilliant post, Gena.
We should save cool things like this on the Wiki.
http://videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/
Looking at it, there's not an immediately apparent space for How To
stuff like this that I can see. There's resources: links to other
sites, and there's
You have to think about the people who are coming to your site. The
majority will be Windows users. However, you will also have Mac and
Linux users as well. You also have to decide on the video quality and
portability issues, i.e. do you want folks to download/share.
Not all of your viewers will
Den 14.04.2007 kl. 16:40 skrev Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would not consider an .avi which is an older codec, lesser quality
and is a huge honking sized file. The Apple TV format is so new that
there is no bases of users. You can be one of the first but how many
people have an Apple TV?
AVI
thank you,
If I chose to go with .swf would that work for Apple TV, ipod and most
everything
necessary for podcast?
Otherwise, how can I convert a .swf to quicktime?
Daryl
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to think about the people who are coming to your
.swf files are actually flash video or flash animation files, exported
with player code so that it is viewable in the browser using Flash
Player. .swf also allows for some interactivity, with clickable
hyperlinks, jumping around in the video or animation, etc. As an
ouput for video I dislike it
well, you have hit on a couple of my concerns.
When I export out of flash as a quicktime movie I loose the sound track of the
imported
and embeded quicktime movie. Any ideas why this is happening?
Some may not know this, but you can publish quicktime, but the export
quicktime
video is a
I had so many issues with swf, I quit using them altogether, so I'm
pulling this out of ancient history... Quicktime and swf are
intermingled somehow. I think quicktime uses an swf in the quicktime
wrapper when making things clickable in the video. Or something.
Someone, please feel free to
Den 14.04.2007 kl. 19:06 skrev caroosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
intermingled somehow. I think quicktime uses an swf in the quicktime
wrapper when making things clickable in the video. Or something.
No.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
I took the original quicktime movie i had, and stripped out the sound track
using Sound
Studio, a nice cheap sound editing program.
Then I imported the seperate sound track into flash and exported it is a
QuickTime Video.
That worked. The quicktime now has he audio.
With the sound track, a
I took the original quicktime movie i had, and stripped out the sound track
using Sound
Studio, a nice cheap sound editing program.
Then I imported the seperate sound track into flash and exported it is a
QuickTime Video.
That worked. The quicktime now has he audio.
With the sound track, a
17 matches
Mail list logo
