[whatwg] Interactive Content

2008-11-25 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] usemap= and related issues

2008-11-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
in the bug you mentioned no longer suffers from the bug. Therefore, it doesn't appear to be necessary that we should require that behaviour. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] usemap= and related issues

2008-12-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
it in quirks mode? As I already said above, neither Opera, Safari or IE8 have the same behaviour. I tested both quirks and standards mode. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] video tag: pixel aspect ratio

2008-12-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
behaved in the same way. What is the use case for wanting a video to be stretched? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] video tag: pixel aspect ratio

2008-12-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
such annoyances upon end users if it avoidable; at least not by default. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented

2009-01-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
...? There won't be any implementation considered to be the reference implementation. But the hope is that all implementations will eventually converge on implementing things in the same way, and that the spec will match. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented

2009-01-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Mike Wilson wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: There will not be, at least in Opera, Firefox or Safari, new modes added beyond the existing no quirks, limited quirks and quirks modes. Do you reckon all, or only some of, these modes will implement the HTML5 spec? (and differ only in css/rendering

Re: [whatwg] Extracted content element.

2009-01-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, or determine that it's not worth addressing. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] embedding meta data for copy/paste usages - possible use case for RDF-in-HTML?

2009-01-19 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to this requires a copy and paste operation. However, I'm not sure what problem you're trying to solve. Why would a user want to do this? Why can't users who want to access their email using a mail client use POP or IMAP? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] embedding meta data for copy/paste usages - possible use case for RDF-in-HTML?

2009-01-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. The problem is getting them to support an import from clipboard feature. However, other use cases, like pasting a quote into a word processor complete with bibliographic information, would need an entirely different format. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] Semi-transparent content models

2009-02-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Hi, The spec defines the semi-transparent content model, but this is no longer used for any elements. Please remove this from the spec. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#transparent-content-models -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] List Headers

2009-02-04 Thread Lachlan Hunt
legendA header for the list/legend ul liList item/li liList item/li liList item/li /ul /figure Since figure is a sectioning root, a heading element could also be used here and it wouldn't affect the outline. Please add an example of this use case to the spec. -- Lachlan

Re: [whatwg] List Headers

2009-02-04 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Garrett Smith wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote: As an example of this, consider the element summaries in the HTML 5 Reference, the attribute list has the heading Attributes, but that heading is not meant to affect the document's outline

Re: [whatwg] Captions, Subtitles and the Video Element

2009-02-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
style associated with them (uncommon). So they can be tweaked via CSS. Whether by the author or overridden by useragent. I do not understand what you mean here. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Dates and coordinates in HTML5

2009-02-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the use case? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Dates and coordinates in HTML5

2009-02-25 Thread Lachlan Hunt
they are use cases for the features that you are asking for. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] section element example

2009-03-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#headings-and-sections -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Historic dates in HTML5

2009-03-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
would make use of the time element and I couldn't find any use of microformats on that page. Could you please elaborate on the relevance of that page in regards to this issue? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] time

2009-03-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/html-design-principles/#solve-real-problems [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/DesignPrinciplesReview#head-98fea741b3ace0c8da87029864ec4a5db4b2358e -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] time

2009-03-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Bruce Lawson wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:05:38 +0530, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote: I think the design principles that are applicable here include Solve Real Problems [2], Real problems to be solved: 1) microformats have accessibility problems with abbr; time element

Re: [whatwg] C:\fakepath\ in HTML5

2009-03-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
.); document.fileupload.UploadFileData.focus(); return false; } -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] A New Way Forward for HTML5

2009-07-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. There is also a set of controls at the top of the specification that does that using JavaScript, and it also sets a cookie so the choice is remembered. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Date/time field types - min, max, popup UI.

2009-09-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
that shows the whole calander for a month or two instead of a drop down. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] article/section/details naming/definition problems

2009-09-17 Thread Lachlan Hunt
comment mean?) We couldn't use a comment element anyway for backwards compatibility reasons. IE does some weird stuff when parsing it. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Use cases for the time element

2009-11-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-11-27 That would allow, for example, user scripts to automatically convert times in the chat log to local times. It could also be used for styling purposes, so it can be styled differently to distingish it from the rest of the line. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http

Re: [whatwg] figureimg* caption

2009-12-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
issues are resolved. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] figureimg* caption

2009-12-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
around the issue, such as using !important or finding ways to increase the specificity of the latter selector, but the point is that introducing unnecessary element clashes creates needless complexities that should be avoided. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http

Re: [whatwg] Question about header and footer

2010-01-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
anyway. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] some thoughts on sandboxed IFRAMEs

2010-02-05 Thread Lachlan Hunt
: $token:sandbox xmlns:$token=…/$token:sandbox No, you couldn't use a namespace like that, because then the sandbox element would not be in the HTML namespace, and thus would not have any known semantics. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] some thoughts on sandboxed IFRAMEs

2010-02-05 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: Kornel Lesinski wrote: However, if we're going to introduce token-based sandbox anyway, I suggest putting token in tag name: sandbox-$token.../sandbox-$token where $token is the random part. This avoids oddity of attributes in closing tag, and is compatible with XML

Re: [whatwg] Two propositions for the autofocus attribute

2010-04-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the last such control that is inserted. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with Stereoscopic displays

2010-04-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Enhancements to the DOM API and markup can be considered later if necessary, such as figuring out how to deal with drawing an HTMLVideoElement playing a 3D video onto a 2D canvas. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Installable web apps

2010-05-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
this extra information into the existing cache manifest file, or into the HTML with meta and link elements, rather than creating a whole new manifest file format. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] On implementing videos with multiple tracks in HTML5

2010-05-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
they don't need may not be worth it. with no embedded subtitles, Timed text tracks within WebM (most likely WebSRT) will eventually be supported. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] audio and video: volume and muted as content attributes?

2010-06-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Why there is no wrap=off, intentional or forgotten?

2010-06-02 Thread Lachlan Hunt
of that defaulted to that wrap=off behaviour. I believe every other mainstream browser I'm aware of since then wraps by default. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] input type=upload (not just files) proposal

2010-06-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
your proposal correctly? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] More YouTube response

2010-07-02 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] More YouTube response

2010-07-02 Thread Lachlan Hunt
that benefits the subscribers in some tangible way. Do whatever you do to find a business model that works; just say no to DRM. It's not needed. The big content industry knows that, they just won't admit it. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 (including next generation additions still in development) - Mozilla Firefox (Not Responding)

2010-07-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, you can use AdBlock in Firefox to block the offending script. Just manually add this URL to your block list. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/status.js -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 (including next generation additions still in development) - Mozilla Firefox (Not Responding)

2010-07-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/status.js The problem is not only with Firefox and it happens I am not only using Firefox. Is there a similar blocking feature of Opera that you can suggest ? Opera includes a Content Blocker feature by default. See Block Content... in the context menu. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http

[whatwg] Stream API Feedback

2011-03-14 Thread Lachlan Hunt
about whether the camera orientation should be relative to the device itself, or relative to fixed Earth coordinates (North, East, Up), like the existing device orientation API. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Stream API Feedback

2011-03-15 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-14 17:59, Lachlan Hunt wrote: There are a few issues with the recently added media streaming API. In addition to what I sent previously, there are some additional use cases that do not appear to be addressed adequately by the current spec for streaming media. In chat clients

Re: [whatwg] device use cases

2011-03-15 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to address these use cases using an API based approach in the future, which will be better than the element based approach of device, but at this stage it is better to keep things simple and focus on just audio and video for now. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http

Re: [whatwg] Stream API Feedback

2011-03-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
echo or, worse, feedback loops. That would only be useful if the audio data were being analysed and output, for example, to an audio spectrum visualisation (like with Mozilla's experimental audio data API). -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on the media stream bootstrap mechanism

2011-03-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
ondisconnect event in the event model could be handled as an error event with an appropriate code, though I'm not sure if that's better or worse than separate event.) -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Stream API Feedback

2011-03-17 Thread Lachlan Hunt
in our initial device implementation and seeking is not possible. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Stream API Feedback

2011-03-17 Thread Lachlan Hunt
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0169.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, device, and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
about what the use cases are for knowing if the camera is either user-view or environment-view. It seems the more useful information to know is the orientation of the camera. If the user switches cameras, that could also be handled by firing orientation events. Lachlan Hunt wrote

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, device, and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-18 15:14, Olli Pettay wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:02 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: This is basically what Philip and I were discussing in the other thread yesterday, where we avoid the unnecessary overhead of creating a magic URL, and instead just assign the object directly to the src property

[whatwg] Video and Audio Tracks API

2011-03-22 Thread Lachlan Hunt
(), and enable() and disable() functions have also been replaced with a single mutable boolean .enabled property. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picture-in-picture -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, device, and related topics

2011-03-23 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-18 15:02, Lachlan Hunt wrote: On 2011-03-18 05:45, Ian Hickson wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: ... audio.src = blob (The src content attribute would then be something like about:objecturl.) Could you elaborate on this plan? ... we avoid the unnecessary

[whatwg] Time Parsing

2011-03-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/C#parse-a-time-component -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] Submitting datetime values should more clearly specify required timezone syntax

2011-03-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-state -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] Invoking getUserMedia() with Unknown Options

2011-03-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, that if the author requests audio,foo, and the user grants access to audio, then the success callback would be invoked, despite the unknown option for foo. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] details for long description of image/ video etc

2011-04-04 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. No, the implementation should not do that. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] Styling details

2011-04-05 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-0 [3] http://images.whatwg.org/sample-details-2.png [4] http://lachy.id.au/dev/2011/details.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Styling details

2011-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, though I do prefer the more elegant display:transparent; approach. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Can we make checkboxes readonly?

2011-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
with using disabled? input type=checkbox disabled input type=checkbox disabled checked -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Can we make checkboxes readonly?

2011-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, but if the controls are readonly, then the user can't change the value and so why does that matter? Could you clarify the use case for having a readonly checkbox value submitted? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Styling details

2011-04-07 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-04-06 02:56, Lachlan Hunt wrote: To render this, the following CSS should be applied by the UA stylesheet. detailssummary:first-of-type { display: list-item; margin-left: 1em; /* LTR-specific: use 'margin-right' for rtl elements */ list-style-type: -o-disclosure-closed; } details

Re: [whatwg] Styling details

2011-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-image: url(...); } [open] summary { list-style-image: url(...); } [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-lists/#glyph-counters -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Styling details

2011-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
'. If the spec can make that permissible, then I think that will be acceptable. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Styling details

2011-04-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, as defined in published CSS recommendations, isn’t bound to any ”::marker”. It certainly is, in the Lists spec. Please cite the recommendation by its official name and/or URL. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-lists/#marker-pseudoelement -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http

[whatwg] Blacklist for regsiterProtocolHandler()

2011-04-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to worry about. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Blacklist for regsiterProtocolHandler()

2011-04-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-04-12 16:18, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Hi, We are investigating registerProtocolHandler and have been discussing the need for a blacklist of protocols to forbid. Our list currently includes: * http: * https: * ftp: * file: Also, blob: Ancient Netscape scripting schemes. some were

Re: [whatwg] Blacklist for regsiterProtocolHandler()

2011-04-19 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-04-19 19:33, Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Lachlan Hunt wrote: We are investigating registerProtocolHandler and have been discussing the need for a blacklist of protocols to forbid. [...] We'd like to know if we've missed any important schemes that must be blocked, and we

Re: [whatwg] Blacklist for regsiterProtocolHandler()

2011-04-19 Thread Lachlan Hunt
://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xml -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Time Parsing

2011-06-15 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-06-15 07:55, Ian Hickson wrote: On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Lachlan Hunt wrote: This should also only allow up to 3 digits representing milliseconds. If there are 4 or more digits (microseconds or beyond), the spec should state that the remaining digits should be truncated. Why? Because

Re: [whatwg] Selectors within style scoped

2011-06-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
will only match elements within the div. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/#the-scope-pseudo-class -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Submitting datetime values should more clearly specify required timezone syntax

2011-06-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-06-16 00:00, Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Lachlan Hunt wrote: The spec states for submission of datetime controls that the value must be expressed in the UTC time-zone. It's not clear whether this requires the formatted string to state the timezone as an uppercase Z or +00

Re: [whatwg] Selectors within style scoped

2011-06-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
, like JQuery does, such as allowing selectors to begin with combinators and creates other unintended side affects. I don't have time to write up a full explanation now, but most of the rationale is somewhere in the public-webapps archives. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au

Re: [whatwg] Selectors within style scoped

2011-06-17 Thread Lachlan Hunt
parameter of the querySelector* methods explicitly allows there to be more than one in that context. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] Delivery reports about your e-mail

2015-11-28 Thread lachlan . hunt

Re: [whatwg] [WF2] Objection to autocomplete Attribute

2005-03-21 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Ian Hickson wrote: On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Lachlan Hunt wrote: I realise I may be a little late with this issue, since WF2 seems to be fairly stable, but never the less I would like to note my objection to the inclusion of the autocomplete attribute [1]. The autocomplete attribute is already

Re: [whatwg] [WF2] Objection to autocomplete Attribute

2005-03-23 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] [WF2] Objection to autocomplete Attribute

2005-03-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
(or equivalent), so they're not prompted each time. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] [WF2] Objection to autocomplete Attribute

2005-03-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
UI when I get prompted on some sites, but not on others. Hmmm... I wonder if adding this to my user stylesheet could be useful for giving me some notification. [autocomplete] { ... } -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com

Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

2005-04-05 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to be implied by Mozilla and IE. Opera and OpenSP correctly don't imply the missing head element. [1] http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/html/parsing/compat/viewer.html [2] http://www.is-thought.co.uk/book/sgml-9.htm#Omitting -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover

Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

2005-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: HTML5 will most likely stop the pretense of HTML being an SGML application. +1. -1 and the mostly undefined error handling, what about HTML 5 will be so incompatible with SGML to warrant such a decision? One example: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi

Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

2005-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Olav Junker Kjr wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: see no problem with defining error handling for broken documents, but no need to break conformance with SGML in the process. HTML is an application of SGML, regardless of all the broken implementations and documents we currently have, and I don't want

Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

2005-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Olav Junker Kjr wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Validators should not be non-conformant simply because they only do their job to validate a document and nothing else. I don't see any reason why such a statement needs to be included at all. I don't see

Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

2005-04-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: | Conformance checkers that only perform validation are non-conformant, So? That doesn't make it a validator. What is a validator, if it is not a form of conformance checker that only peforms validation then? Or, the other way around, what

Re: [whatwg] p elements containing other block-level elements

2005-04-07 Thread Lachlan Hunt
elements within the spec. ol, ul { display: block } li { display: list-item; } p ol, p ul, p li { display: inline } -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] p elements containing other block-level elements

2005-04-07 Thread Lachlan Hunt
be used in HTML because there are no namespaces. Whereas, the only reason pol//p can't be used in HTML is for bugwards compatibility. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

2005-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Henri Sivonen wrote: On Apr 7, 2005, at 09:58, Lachlan Hunt wrote: There's no reason why a full conformance checker couldn't be based on OpenSP. It would be prudent not to use OpenSP in order to avoid accidentally allowing SGMLisms that are alien to real-world tag soup. If I ever get around

Re: [whatwg] p elements containing other block-level elements

2005-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
] http://www.is-thought.co.uk/book/home.htm -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] p elements containing other block-level elements

2005-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
being too restrictive. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

[whatwg] [WF2] Fixing Repetition Template Degradation in IE without Scripting

2005-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-hyphens -- ensures that the enitire comment remains valid in SGML. [1] I called it a pseudo comment because it's not really a full comment in SGML terms, it only looks like one. The real SGML comment is the full thing including: !-- ... -- -- -- -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http

[whatwg] [WA1] Title Element Content Model

2005-04-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2004/09/15/when-blog-software-attacks/ -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

[whatwg] [WA1] Specifying Character Encoding

2005-04-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
or UTF-16, as described in the XML recommendation. [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#charset [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/#xml-media-types -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim

Re: [whatwg] [WA1] Title Element Content Model

2005-04-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: | In HTML (as opposed to XHTML), the title element must not contain | content other than text and entities; user agents must parse the | element so that entities are recognised and processed, but all other | markup is interpreted as literal text. I

Re: [whatwg] [WA1] Specifying Character Encoding

2005-04-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: | In XHTML, the XML declaration should be used for inline character | encoding information. | | Authors should avoid including inline character encoding information. | Character encoding information should instead be included at the | transport level

Re: [whatwg] [WA1] Specifying Character Encoding

2005-04-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
one. The current wording provides application/xhtml+xml and application/xml as examples only, which I think is acceptable. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] p elements containing other block-level elements

2005-04-11 Thread Lachlan Hunt
are the odds of that? :-) I've made the spec not restrict the content models per se, just say this element can contain this category of elements and made sure the elements are in the right categories. That seems like the most appropriate way to handle it. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http

Re: [whatwg] Image maps: should we drop a coords=?

2005-04-11 Thread Lachlan Hunt
title=Close up photo of the swing set area coords=... shape=poly href=tree alt=Old Willow Tree title=Close up photo of the old, gnarled willow tree /map -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] p elements containing other block-level elements

2005-04-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Matthew Thomas wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: ... I don't understand what's wrong with the XML error handling. I think it's great because errors should be caught and handled during the authoring process and by the CMS, which XML essentially forces. http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/01/14

Re: [whatwg] HTML5: New link-types regarding guideline 2.4 in WCAG 2.0

2005-04-14 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Could some of these be improved and included within web apps? http://lachy.id.au/dev/markup/specs/wclr/ I haven't read it completely, but this sentence sounds incorrect: # Designates a resource containing user contributed comments. May be # used

Re: [whatwg] [WF2] Conformance Requirements Issues

2005-04-14 Thread Lachlan Hunt
*. Fair point. Done. I also made it (as you suggested, I think) only the forms-related parts. Yes, that looks good. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox

Re: [whatwg] [web-apps] 2.7.8 The i element

2005-04-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Ian Hickson wrote: On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Perhaps. it's been argued many times before that i is the most suitable element to use for such purposes; but then again, italics for ship names is merely a typographical convention and the i element is as meaningless as span

<    1   2   3   4   >