Re: [Wikidata] Help needed for Freebase to Wikidata migration

Dear Thomas, I am personally interested in the chemistry bits, and checked the list, but did not see the chemistry domain from Freebase: https://www.freebase.com/chemistry/chemical_compound?schema= Is that just a matter of timing, or is it left out because WP/WD already has a good coverage?

Re: [Wikidata] Help needed for Freebase to Wikidata migration

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: On 16 June 2015 at 19:43, Thomas Pellissier-Tanon thoma...@google.com wrote: I've just added to the page properties for chemistry: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Freebase/Mapping#Chemistry It

Re: [Wikidata] Units are live! \o/

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Michael Peel wrote: > It seems to assume a default uncertainty on values, though: I just added > the elevation above sea level to: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1513315 > just specifying the central value, and it assumes that this value is

[Wikidata] query.wikidata.org and wikibase:Statement ?

Hi all, after a tweet from Magnus [0] we talked a bit about entries without statements (about 2.5M) and on the question if SPARQL could list all entries in Wikidata that do not have statements. I played a bit with combinations of OPTIONAL and FILTER-BOUND and FILTER NOT EXIST... something like:

Re: [Wikidata] query.wikidata.org and wikibase:Statement ?

Dear Stas, thanks for your reply! On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> statements (about 2.5M) and on the question if SPARQL could list all >> entries in Wikidata that do not have statements. I played a bit with > > Technically, it could, but since

[Wikidata] property value max lenght? (aka: why doesn't this InChI fit??)

Hi all, I just discovered that there seems to be a limit on the length of property values... some properties for compounds, however, are longer, the InChI being a good example... 400 chars is not enough for some compounds in Wikipedia, like teixobactin (Q18720369) This length is not defined

Re: [Wikidata] SQID evolved again: references

Super! Egon On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Markus Kroetzsch wrote: > Dear all, > > By popular demand, SQID now also shows references for most statements > (collapsed by default, of course). You can see it, e.g., here: > >

Re: [Wikidata] Op-ed on Wikipedia Signpost regarding Wikidata licensing

All, first, thanks for your reply blog, Gerard. On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Markus Kroetzsch wrote: >> I have written my opinion on the licensing of Wikidata data.. [1] > > I agree with your position there. So do I. The original article ends with: "Among

Re: [Wikidata] Help with SPARQL queries

Daniel, On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Daniel Mietchen wrote: > What I want now is a list of (ideally) statements (or - less ideally - > items with such statements) that have references of one of the types > given in (1) and (2). It would look something like:

Re: [Wikidata] WDQS stability

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Markus Kroetzsch wrote: > Thanks for the update. Maybe this is a good opportunity to say that you and > everybody involved in WDQS are doing a tremendous job in maintaining this > service. Even with the small glitches in the last

Re: [Wikidata] Status and ETA External ID conversion

I think the predicate may need depend on the type of thing we're linking, and on what is being linked. A strong predicate, like owl:sameAs, requires a (very) strong similarity between concepts... this is often not the case... mind you, this applies also to the things being linked... there are

Re: [Wikidata] Status and ETA External ID conversion

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > Ok. I think we're making this much more complicated than necessary. The > question you should ask yourself is: Does this identify a concept in another > database/website/...? Nice to have: a website to link to.

Re: [Wikidata] Status and ETA External ID conversion

Hi Lydia, all, On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On 05.03.2016 14:45, Lydia Pintscher wrote: >> Give it another 2 to 3 weeks and it'll get there. More and more editors >> are exposed to the separation in the UI now and start noticing the ones

Re: [Wikidata] Status and ETA External ID conversion

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> >> What is the exact process? Do you just plan to wait longer to see if >> anyone supports/contradicts my

Re: [Wikidata] Status and ETA External ID conversion

Mmm... I previously added a few chemical identifiers, like KEGG, ChEBI, DrugBank, but I cannot find them anymore... :/ Egon On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Lydia, all, > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch >

Re: [Wikidata] Status and ETA External ID conversion

Never mind. I found these in already done. Egon On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mmm... I previously added a few chemical identifiers, like KEGG, > ChEBI, DrugBank, but I cannot find them anymore... :/ > > Egon > > On

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata to search chemical compound names

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Sebastian Burgstaller wrote: > A way to achieve this could be to fetch all labels and aliases for all > chemical compounds in one query and store them locally in your web > application. This certainly is only feasible if the number

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 > says it is not. There is a huge problem. How is DSM-5 not an ontology itself? Why is this a huge problem? Isn't this just two sources

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > We are talking DSM. When the DSM had never called something a disease and > never had a consistent presentation. When there is a lot of literature > showing how that something is NOT a disease, why persist on

Re: [Wikidata] Multiple properties/identifiers for the same resource

Hi Jerven, all On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Jerven Tjalling Bolleman wrote: > Could I be so bold to suggest that in Wikidata we should strive > to use external URI's for identifiers not Strings. > > For example in Wikidata, there are a lot of UniProt accessions. >

Re: [Wikidata] signing license declarations

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Benjamin Good wrote: > How do you plan to handle updates ? Bug the upstream author when they make a release... like in the other part of the thread, it's upstream should make it clearly available under CCZero from their site... but we

Re: [Wikidata] signing license declarations

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Benjamin Good wrote: > When negotiating the import of data from resources that are not CC0, it > would be very valuable to have a somewhat formal process to allow them to > declare that some portions of their databases may be imported into

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Lydia Pintscher < lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > > Based on this my proposal is to increase string and URL and > potentially external identifier if you request it. One open question > is still what the new limit should be. > For small compounds this is

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

> > 2016-10-08 11:33 GMT+02:00 Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com>: > >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Lydia Pintscher < >> lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Egon Willighagen >&g

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Lydia Pintscher < lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Egon Willighagen > <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For small compounds this is answered by Sebastian's analysis... 5K would > > c

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Lydia Pintscher < lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Egon Willighagen > <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ah, those numbers are for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P234 > ... > &g

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

Hi all, sorry for joining the party late... On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Sebastian Burgstaller wrote: > I think this topic might have been discussed many months ago. For > certain data types in the chemical compound space (P233, canonical > smiles, P2017

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

rall > slightly shorter. > > Best, > Sebastian > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Can you figure out what a good limit would be for these two use cases? > I.e. > > what would support 99%, 99.9%, and 10

Re: [Wikidata] Greater than 400 char limit for Wikidata string data types

e information here: http://jcheminf.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/1758-2946-5-7 Egon > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:27 AM Egon Willighagen < > egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Sebastian, great you found time for it! I didn't :/ (Stats are worth a >> tweet, IMHO :) >

Re: [Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

doing few competitions on Kaggle : > https://www.kaggle.com/amitkumarjaiswal. > > Please let me know how can I join/participate in this meeting. > > Regards > > Thank you > Amit Kumar Jaiswal > > On 4/23/17, Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Wiki

Re: [Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

Maarten > > > > On 23-04-17 12:34, Egon Willighagen wrote: >> >> Dear Amit, >> >> you make me painfully aware of something I should have mentioned (my >> apologies for haven forgotten that; still tired from the science march >> yesterday): it is not

[Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

Hi Wikidata community, on May 29 in Delft, The Netherlands, the first national meeting is planned for researchers (at a various stage of their career) about the Dutch National Plan Open Science. There will be a large session where organisations and individuals can present their experiences with

Re: [Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

t; Feel free to add the event on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Events > :) > > On 23 April 2017 at 11:24, Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Wikidata community, >> >> on May 29 in Delft, The Netherlands, the first nation

Re: [Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Arne Wossink wrote: > Interesting opportunity! I would be interested in attending and/or helping > out as WMNL representative, but I don't have a case study or anything else I > could contribute. Yes, of course, Wikidata is just part of

Re: [Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Arne Wossink wrote: > Sounds good. How do we proceed from here? Are you going to propose a session > for this day and invite attendees? Do we need to sign up anywhere? Yes, we need to register. But we don't need a proposal: 1. it will be an

Re: [Wikidata] Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

Dear Arne, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Arne Wossink wrote: > Thank you for taking on the role of coordinator! I'm happy to present > anything if necessary, but that depends on the format of the day, I guess. This Friday we will likely finalize the program of the full

Re: [Wikidata] Improve Wikidata links to Dutch municipalities

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Wouter Beek wrote: > Wikidata currently includes links to the Kadaster, but these do not point to > the proper IRIs. For example, Dutch municipalities in Wikidata currently > link to an HTML viewer of Kadaster [1], but they should point to our >

[Wikidata] [update] Re: Joining May 29, National Plan Open Science meeting in Delft, The Netherlands

Hi all, here's a quick update below... (in case you missed it: there is this event page: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Events/NPOS2017) On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Léa Lacroix wrote: > Thanks Egon for letting us know. > Feel free to add the event on

Re: [Wikidata] Improve Wikidata links to Dutch municipalities

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > I'm ambivalent as to which is the ideal solution; but using both, > inconsistently, and on an arbitrary basis, is certainly not it. I agree, but we're in a mixed world right now... semantic web is being picked up,

Re: [Wikidata] Improve Wikidata links to Dutch municipalities

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > On 19 May 2017 at 11:49, Egon Willighagen <egon.willigha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I am not sure I see how you want to achieve that beyond Wikidata at > > this moment? > &g

Re: [Wikidata] An answer to Lydia Pintscher regarding its considerations on Wikidata and CC-0

Dear Mathieu, On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Mathieu Stumpf Guntz < psychosl...@culture-libre.org> wrote: > I forward here the message I initially posted on the Meta Tremendous > Wiktionary User Group talk page >

Re: [Wikidata] An answer to Lydia Pintscher regarding its considerations on Wikidata and CC-0

Dear Mathieu, On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM, mathieu stumpf guntz <psychosl...@culture-libre.org> wrote: > Le 30/11/2017 à 10:13, Egon Willighagen a écrit : >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Mathieu Stumpf Guntz >> <psychosl...@culture-libre.org> wrote: >&

Re: [Wikidata] Recoin2: New version of relative completeness status indicator for all entities

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Simon Razniewski wrote: > More information can be found on the tools page at > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ls1g/Recoin2. > > Interesting! At the moment the colored indicator refers to

Re: [Wikidata] Please support risk factor Wikidata property

Dear Houcemeddine, interesting proposal, indeed. I left a comment on the page, which basically says we need qualifiers and references. The references because some claims will be controversial (even if backed up by literature), while I also see these links as likely time bound, due to changing

Re: [Wikidata] You can now query the constraint violations with the Query Service

Nice, I put it to use [0,1]. Question, what if the WDQS has a wikisource export format, allowing me to copy/paste output easily as table in a Wikidata page? Is something like that already possible? (Alternatively, maybe the Listeria bot can handle this much better, but I still have to learn how

Re: [Wikidata] On traceability and reliability of data we publish [was Re: [Wikimedia-l] Solve legal uncertainty of Wikidata]

On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 5:59 PM mathieu lovato stumpf guntz < psychosl...@culture-libre.org> wrote: > I agree this is misconception that a copyright license make any direct > change to data reliability. But attribution requirement does somewhat > indirectly have an impact on it, as it legally

Re: [Wikidata] Query on scholarly article fails

The approach I use is the following, see this (Bioclipse/Groovy) script: https://gist.github.com/egonw/ca4c348b9a2d1116efcdb55fa85dd158 It takes advantage of a combination Blazegraph SPARQL trick and breaking up thing in batches of a certain size: SELECT ?art ?artLabel WITH { SELECT ?art WHERE {

Re: [Wikidata] Query on scholarly article fails

the next days but I already have a > question: the number of iterations is based on the total number of > articles, how do you know that ? > > --- > Fabrizio > > Il giorno sab 15 dic 2018 alle ore 10:18 Egon Willighagen < > egon.willigha...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >

Re: [Wikidata] Useful resources for Scholia

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:10 AM Houcemeddine A. Turki < turkiabdelwa...@hotmail.fr> wrote: > I thank you for your efforts. I invite you to use several useful resources > available in https://shubhanshu.com/awesome-scholarly-data-analysis/ to > enrich Scholia project. > Many of the linked

Re: [Wikidata] Virtuoso hosted Wikidata Instance

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:10 AM Kingsley Idehen wrote: > We have loaded Wikidata into a Virtuoso instance accessible via SPARQL [1]. > One benefit is helping to understand Wikidata using our Faceted Browsing > Interface for Entity Relationship Types [2][3]. Awesome! I've started seeing how

Re: [Wikidata] Important, Critical issues related to Wikidata

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:44 PM Houcemeddine A. Turki wrote: > > I thank you for your efforts. It was an honour for me to meet you in > Stockholm. Concerning the points you raised, I > 1. Concerning the problematic use of Instance of and SubClass of, I invite > you to see

Re: [Wikidata] ShEx to validate Medical Wikidata

Dear Houcemeddine, On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:57 PM Houcemeddine A. Turki wrote: > I ask if someone is interested in creating shape expressions of Medical > Wikidata classes. Cool, please do! > As well, I tried to access http://wikidata-shex.wmflabs.org/w/index.php. > However, it does not

Re: [Wikidata] ShEx to validate Medical Wikidata

On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:07 PM Houcemeddine A. Turki wrote: > However, it does not include many schemas. We should develop schemas for > medical classes before using ShEx to validate Medical Wikidata statements. Yes, please do. I have been working on ShEx for other domains. It's a fairly new

Re: [Wikidata] Important, Critical issues related to Wikidata

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:20 PM Houcemeddine A. Turki wrote: > I thank you for your efforts. I tried to contact Ms. Léa Lacroix and Ms. > Lydia. However, I failed due to my participation to many sessions. I saw Ms. > Lydia when returning to the hotel on the third day. But, I had to go for the

Re: [Wikidata] Personal news: a new role

Dear Houcemeddine, do you happen to have a preprint for that online? Egon -- Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are available available for innovative new uses. Join me in asking the American Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too.

Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #384

Hi Houcemeddine, you can just add your article yourself to the "Next" page: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Status_updates/Next With kind regards, Egon On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM Houcemeddine A. Turki wrote: > > Dear Ms., > I thank you for your answer. You did not mention our work

[Wikidata] formatter URL that requires encoding the statement value?

Hi all, for the SMILES (line representation for chemical structures; [0]) there are currently two properties (P233 and P2017). Each one of them has a formatter URL to link out to an open source depiction tool (CDKDepict). But statement values for both properties can have characters that need to

Re: [Wikidata] WDQS and SPARQL Endpoint Compatibility

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:15 PM Maarten Dammers wrote: > Since Stas left last year, unfortunately nobody from the WMF has done > anything with > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:SPARQL_federation_input . I don't > know if the new SPARQL people are even aware of this page. > That's my

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

I'll have a go at it. Egon On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 3:51 PM Lydia Pintscher < lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 3:46 PM Lydia Pintscher > wrote: > > Hey :) > > > > Adam got the current numbers for us at > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P12190 > > Anyone up for

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

Proposed: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Generic#Linked_Open_Data_Cloud_identifier Egon On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:38 AM Egon Willighagen wrote: > > I'll have a go at it. > > Egon > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 3:51 PM Lydia Pintscher < > lydi

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

How will we handle LOD entries for data sets provided by a third party? For example, Bio2RDF released over time quite a few data sets, each having a separate entry in the LOD cloud, e.g. Bio2rdf::DrugBank? Do we create a separate Wikidata item for that? Link it to the Wikidata item for Drugbank,

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

Awesome, thanks! How was it done? I like to learn a bit more about the steps. Egon On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:02 AM Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:53, Lydia Pintscher > wrote: > > > And we now have the Property \o/ > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P8605 > > Now in

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

gt; > > On 16.09.20 15:53, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 9:06 AM Egon Willighagen > > wrote: > >> Proposed: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Generic#Linked_Open_Data_Cloud_identifier > >> > >> Egon >

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

All, On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:54 PM Lydia Pintscher < lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > And we now have the Property \o/ > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P8605 When approved, a fifth example was added, for a Bio2RDF subset in the LOD cloud, linked the Bio2RDF entry in Wikidata

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 9:06 AM Egon Willighagen > wrote: > > Proposed: > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Generic#Linked_Open_Data_Cloud_identifier > > > > Egon > > And we now have the Property \o/ > https://www.wikidata.or

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata in the LOD cloud

Of particular interest is the link counts, based on formatter URI for RDF resource (P1921). There are 167 property - P1921 combinations: https://w.wiki/YsV Calculating the number of links times out when run for all properties: https://w.wiki/Ysk So, an iterative script is likely more practical.

Re: [Wikidata] WDQS status

Dear Guillaume, On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:23 PM Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > Some very preliminary analysis indicates that less then 2% of the queries > on WDQS generate more than 90% of the load. This is definitely something we > need to better understand. > Is the data behind that available? I

Re: [Wikidata] WDQS outage - 2020/07/23

See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T242453 linked on the report page On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 6:55 PM Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 7/24/20 3:18 PM, Ryan Kemper wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We experienced WDQS service disruptions on 2020/07/23. As a result > > there was a full outage (inability

[Wikidata] Re: Challenge of the day (2): ports without located in or next to body of water

Thanks, I found it more difficult for regions I do not know, as I am not familiar with naming conventions, and add them on a map makes it easier to shorten a todo list:

[Wikidata] Re: Wikidata Graph Split update

Hi, thank you for the update. The email writes that "Queries that need federation will need to be rewritten. You can ask for help to rewrite queries". Do you have guidelines on how to do this? It took quite some effort to make some of the (I thought simple) queries work, but later improvements

[Wikidata] Re: Wikidata Graph Split update

ls for other graph dbs on how they handle federation? > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:39 AM Egon Willighagen < > egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, thank you for the update. >> >> The email writes that "Queries that need federation will need

[Wikidata-l] Wikidata-Toolkit NullPointerException

Hi all, I have been trying today to get the Java library Wikidata-Toolkit going, but about to give up... I keep running with both 0.3.0 and current master into a NullPointerException... I thought it was how I called the code, and did add several System.out calls, and in the end just tried to get

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata-Toolkit NullPointerException

since its release and it won't read the files anyway). Could you try if the problem occurs with the current development code at github? Cheers, Markus On 17.01.2015 16:59, Egon Willighagen wrote: Hi all, I have been trying today to get the Java library Wikidata-Toolkit going, but about

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata-Toolkit NullPointerException

OK, thanks! Please let me know if I can test anything on my system. Egon On 17 Jan 2015 22:50, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote: On 17.01.2015 22:43, Egon Willighagen wrote: This last test from the cmd line is already with master from GitHub... Thanks, we

Re: [Wikidata-l] Where did the JSON dumps go?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote: Apparently a small screwup deleted them all. Jan is working on a fix right now. Meanwhile, this torrent of the Jan 12 (last week's) JSON dump is available:

Re: [Wikidata-l] Wikidata-Toolkit NullPointerException

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote: It is easy to fix this (though I will not fix it tonight, but tomorrow) by just adjusting the HTML strings we parse for. Sure! I have subscribed to the bug report. As an intermediate workaround for me, what

Re: [Wikidata-l] next 2 rounds of arbitrary access coming up

Dear Lydia, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote: The rollout of arbitrary access on Dutch Wikipedia Is there an overview of Dutch WP pages where it is being used? The Berlin/Germany use case experienced resistance, needed further discussion and

Re: [Wikidata-l] next 2 rounds of arbitrary access coming up

Lydia, thanks for your insights! Egon On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Egon Willighagen egon.willigha...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Lydia, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc