Shouldn't it be more logic to log only status changes ? I mean, if you are in a degraded state, you will log the same thing each minute else if you have fixed the issue.
Le mer. 12 févr. 2020 à 11:43, Tellier Benoit <btell...@apache.org> a écrit : > +1 > > We should make this happen. > > On 12/02/2020 17:29, Matthieu Baechler wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:27 +0700, Tellier Benoit wrote: > > > >> - Through grafana, the admin will have the information directly > >> available. Nowaday, health-checks requires her to execute the > >> healthcheck via webadmin. More actions is generally the best way of > >> having none of them taken. > >> > > > > I just want to add, on that matter, that I already proposed to have a > > timer that logs health state to WARN when status is `degraded` and > > ERROR when status is `down` on a sensible time interval (like once a > > minute) and that would be enabled in our default configuration. > > > > That way the logs, which are the first and most basic tool any admin is > > looking at, would give you that very important information. > > > > Cheers, > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > >
