Then an admin might miss the original log, if out of it's browsing window.

However I agree the log could be done at a lower pace:
 - Check every minute, log directly upon status change
 - Otherwise re-log current status every 30 minutes

On 12/02/2020 17:48, Antoine Duprat wrote:
> Shouldn't it be more logic to log only status changes ?
> 
> I mean, if you are in a degraded state, you will log the same thing each
> minute else if you have fixed the issue.
> 
> Le mer. 12 févr. 2020 à 11:43, Tellier Benoit <btell...@apache.org> a
> écrit :
> 
>> +1
>>
>> We should make this happen.
>>
>> On 12/02/2020 17:29, Matthieu Baechler wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:27 +0700, Tellier Benoit wrote:
>>>
>>>>  - Through grafana, the admin will have the information directly
>>>> available. Nowaday, health-checks requires her to execute the
>>>> healthcheck via webadmin. More actions is generally the best way of
>>>> having none of them taken.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just want to add, on that matter, that I already proposed to have a
>>> timer that logs health state to WARN when status is `degraded` and
>>> ERROR when status is `down` on a sensible time interval (like once a
>>> minute) and that would be enabled in our default configuration.
>>>
>>> That way the logs, which are the first and most basic tool any admin is
>>> looking at, would give you that very important information.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to