Am Montag, den 10.07.2017, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 10.07.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >
> >
> > The "nobody" user has special semantics on Linux: it's where things
> > are mapped to that can't be mapped otherwise. It's used by user
> > namspacing, by NFS and others. It's really not a good idea, to permit
> > random services to create and access files under that ID
>
> and run it as root is a better idea?
> seriously?
This is moot. If you specify a user that is considered wrong for whatever
reason the service must fail. Whether we disagree about who decide what is
a valid user name also does not matter. You cannot substitute users for
any reason.
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
