Okay, so we've got:
Irrefutable arguments for using wicket in big slow companies:
* Very small learning curve.
Comment: Agreed. But I still think you need at least one more
experienced Wicket developers for more advanced things like
manipulating html generated by other components. Of course, books
like 'Pro Wicket' help a lot but are not for every programmer.
* Natural programming paradigm familiar to Java developers
Comment: Changed that to _Java_ developers.
* Excellent feedback messages of the framework when something goes
wrong.
* Robustness, no weird or unexpected behavior.
* Limited knowledge required of web technologies (HTML, javascript)
and still do advanced stuff in a fraction of the time it takes you
with other frameworks (just consider e.g. something as tabs and
paging).
Comment: I am not sure so sure about this one. Do you mean that
you only need limited knowledge of HTML and Javascript? And what
do you mean by 'advanced stuff'?
May I add:
* Excellent clustering support.
Rationale: even though you can discuss about this to death (as on
the thread on JavaLobby), I think we agree that Wicket currently
has sufficient knobs to make this is a problem solved.
* Excellent mailing list support.
I also thought about: * Good support for modern web pages (AJAX), while
being compatible with older browsers. But this one is I am afraid not
good enough. For example FireFox 1.0 is not supported.
Anyone else?
Thanks Erik,
Erik.
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
