Hi Eelco, Nino, > I'm not even sure whether I agree :) Wicket can be hard for people > that are not comfortable with OO programming... > > I did not have a very small learning curve, nor did the two other consultants > working here. > I guess 'very small learning curve' is off then. I must confess I have to unlearn myself as well even though I have plenty of pure OO experiences and even though I have never ever liked PHP, JSP and even rhtml. (Shameless plug for RoR and html template fans: see project Persia http://blog.finalist.com/2006/09/25/finalist_project_persia/.)
How about: - No need to learn new languages, Java and HTML is sufficient. About the experienced developer: there should be an experienced developer an any non trivial project. So this should not be a problem. >> Good support for modern web pages (AJAX), while ... FireFox 1.0 is not >> supported. >> > This is not inherently true for the framework though.... True, but that is not good enough for this very biased list :) Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user