On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 12:27 -0800, you wrote:
> we could just point at our CI? That'd be Dockerfiles for anything > Linux and prepare.sh for FreeBSD and macOS. The benefit would be > that we'd maintain this in one place only. We could invest a bit of > time in documenting the Dockerfiles/prepare.sh scripts so they > explain these? Yeah, agree, that sounds better than maintaining the information separately. > :) -- yes, I mislabeled that one. I actually meant to say > "Maintenance Updates". Fixed in the wiki page. Perfect. :). > I'm definitely not the expert here but it all looks like Catalina > with varying additions: Yeah, I saw that, but not sure if that means they are actively removing older images. I'll see if I can find out. > Btw I didn't include anything about architectures ... for Debian 9 > we currently have a 32-bit container, for some other platforms those > are still available too. Do we still care about 32-bit? Limiting to 64-bit seems fine to me for our current CI platforms. I'm wondering about supporting ARM (32- & 64-bit for Linux, 64bit for future macOS), but looks like CI doesn't support that yet either way: https://github.com/cirruslabs/cirrus-ci-docs/issues/218 Robin -- Robin Sommer * Corelight, Inc. * ro...@corelight.com * www.corelight.com
_______________________________________________ zeek-dev mailing list -- zeek-dev@lists.zeek.org To unsubscribe send an email to zeek-dev-le...@lists.zeek.org
