2015-02-19 12:35 GMT+01:00 dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com>: > On 15.02.2015 13:39, Laurent Bourgès wrote: >> >> Mario & andrews, >> >> Thanks for your prompt answers. >> >> > I agree with Andrew, getting the JEP proposed is the minimum >> > requirement to get this work unstuck. >> >> Ok, so it is the way to go. >> > > I don't think that filing JEPs for code that isn't part of an OpenJDK > Project makes a lot of sense. > > The first step would be to find a suitable home for such code within an > existing OpenJDK Project, or to form a new one. A potentially suitable home > could be [0], for example, if (and only if) everyone involved agrees. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > [0] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/graphics-rasterizer/
The code is part of an OpenJDK project, though, it's already the existing Java rasterizer. Of course I'm fine with giving it a formal home in the Graphics Rasterizer project (where it naturally belongs), but let's also try to be a bit more pragmatic, this code is in hold since more than one year now, the JEP process can be started before giving a formal home, or at least concurrently to that. It would be a shame if the process overhead kills the project again. Cheers, Mario -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/
