Phil, Just a short comment:
> pisces was originally written for the "ME" environment so I suspect that > it was very conservative in allocating new heap space. That clearly does not > matter so much on desktop so the proportional approach rather than > the fixed size approach seems better. 1/8th seems conservative and > since the results look good so I don't object. I think Path2D is part of the java2d api and seems not related to pisces ? > I think a new bug id would be required as this is another thing that > might be backported to pisces in 8u60. Agreed. Laurent
