Hi, I was also looking into this test case under https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224969 I will close it as duplicate of this bug. I saw that in case of Ubuntu and Mac we are throwing "java.awt.print.PrinterException: No print service found. " but I in case of Windows test just timesout.
Since there was difference in behavior between different platforms I created product bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224961 . If difference in behavior is expected then we can close this issue. Changes of adding @key printer under JDK-8225007 looks good to me. Thanks, Jay -----Original Message----- From: Sergey Bylokhov Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 7:07 AM To: Philip Race Cc: 2d-dev Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8225007: java/awt/print/PrinterJob/LandscapeStackOverflow.java may hang On 29/05/2019 18:06, Philip Race wrote: > This test does not check. Nor does (IIRC) the implementation, [1] I guess it is checked in the RasterPrintJob.print() where the code call the getPrintService(). And getPrintService() returns null if there are no printers installed, as a result "new PrinterException("No print service found.") is thrown. I checked this test on win10 w/o printers installed and it pass but throw the next exception to the log[1]. But if I tries to print from the notepad it really suggest to install the printer. > because you want an experience like what you would get if you tried to > print from notepad, word, IE, whatever. > Which was to prompt you to install a printer if there is none. > That was the idea "back in the day" and is what happened on XP for > sure.>> - When the test is executed the printer promts the location > to where store the pdf file(probably this location can be set to some > default and we will able to test printing as well at someday) > > Even on a system with physical printers configured, if a pdf printer > is the default you could get prompted, but there is no API that I know of > that can tell you this. I guess we need to documents this, since such "additional" windows from printers/onenotes etc may affect other tests. > > -phil >> >> BTW this windows system was soooo slow so I was not able to move the mouse >> to select the file location, and have to reboot it.... >> >>> >>> -Phil. >>> >>>> On May 29, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> If you try to print when there is no printer the behavior is not strictly >>>> specified. >>>> >>>> -Phil. >>>> >>>>>> On May 29, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov >>>>>> <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29/05/2019 15:16, Philip Race wrote: >>>>>> It doesn't hang there. It hangs in print(). >>>>> >>>>> I guess it is even more strange, it hangs when tries to print to >>>>> non-existent printer. I guess in this case the "new PrinterException("No >>>>> print service found.")" should be thrown. It looks like a bug, no? >>>>> >>>>>> -phil. >>>>>>>> On 5/29/19, 3:17 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: >>>>>>>> On 29/05/2019 14:09, Phil Race wrote: >>>>>>>> think the mystery is not why it times out now, but why it did not do >>>>>>>> so earlier. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But I assume it if the system does not have the printer then >>>>>>> PrinterJob.getPrinterJob() should not hang? >>>>>>> It looks like the test correctly assume that .getPrinterJob() should >>>>>>> returns something even if there are no printers, and also tries to >>>>>>> catch any exceptions in the print(); I guess its expectation are >>>>>>> according the specification, isn't? >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, Sergey. >>>> >>> >> >> -- Best regards, Sergey.
