Theoretically we've been going to fix this fragile test for weeks.
It tests something important or else I'd ditch it completely ..
Prasanta ?
-phil.
On 10/30/19, 7:14 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Matthias,
looks good, I definitely second that. Let's wait what 2d folks (Phil?)
have to say.
Best regards
Christoph
*From:* Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>
*Sent:* Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2019 14:59
*To:* 2d-dev@openjdk.java.net
*Cc:* Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>
*Subject:* RFR [XS] : 8233202: exclude
javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicGraphicsUtils/8132119/bug8132119.java
Please review the following small change .
It excludes
javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicGraphicsUtils/8132119/bug8132119.java ;
the test seems to be fragile on various Linux distros ,
for instance on our Ubuntu 18 .
The issues are already described in detail here :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229935
"All in all this test looks really fragile. It is a miracle it has
passed as much as it has .. I think Linux
may expose this because the font being used is more or less "fixed" on
the other platforms but
on Linux the font being used varies."
As long as 8229935 is notfixed, the test should be excluded at
least on Linux .
Bug/webrev :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233202
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8233202.0/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embaesken/webrevs/8233202.0/>
Thanks, Matthias
