ha ha ha

that phone service is mental

Ive had people at my house with mixes on whilst we
chat/drink etc and only find out at the end of a mix
that someone has used it to id about 6 tracks from a
mix - only for me to tell them that

1: I have all the tracks if they had asked
2: I can get a tracklist
3: its a bought mix and the cover is next to the CD
player

the amount of money that people must waste on that
service, but if it keeps it there for when its needed
then I guess its not wasted.

To get this back on topic someone used it to id that
Divina track that was bootlegged recently when I was
playing the record

Cheers
BT
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ah ha Thor!
> 
> This is most interesting (to me anyway).  Insofar as
> I was asking about something that searched for the
> titles of tracks on albums
> etc. - which is what I need right now to help me ID
> a track (I think) was called "Congo Square" - not
> the actual musical (or not)
> content.
> But, just like you it seems, even as I was typing
> it, I started thinking about what you're talking
> about.  And specifically does
> such a thing already exist?  In that we have this
> phone service here in the UK where you can ring a
> number, play the music to the
> phone and it texts you the artist and track title
> back.  Or it mostly does anyway, sometime you catch
> it out but I know people who
> stayed up late one night playing obscure AE tracks
> etc. to it and it got them all, sometimes I've tried
> it from a gig and it hasn't
> worked (you don't have to pay if it doesn't do the
> ID) but that may well be due to the distortion /
> background noise.  So I was
> wondering if that was an automated search with a set
> up that I bet took some tweaking or do this outfit
> just have a bunch of captive
> muso nerds that ID the tracks?
> 
> F
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thor Teague [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: 19 July 2007 15:43
> > To: 313@hyperreal.org
> > Subject: Re: (313) track identifier future gadget
> machine
> > 
> > There was a copyright protection tool developed by
> this guy 
> > in California recently that uses pixel
> identification to 
> > troll through internet sites like youtube and
> myspace and 
> > finds copyrighted films--its identification is
> sophisticated 
> > enough that it can find copyright films ripped
> from DVD 
> > (OBVIOUSLY) but it can also find cam rips, even
> with a shaky 
> > camera, even with people walking in front of the
> screen. I 
> > hear it does well regardless of compression and
> pixel 
> > size/aspect ratio.
> > 
> > I don't know how related they are, but on the
> level of 1's 
> > and 0's it almost seems like it could be reverse
> engineered. 
> > You could feed a snippet into a search engine
> (discogs) which 
> > it uses to search its library and find a match. If
> it were 
> > engineered well enough, maybe it could handle
> input files 
> > that were pristine or recorded with a handheld
> device like a 
> > microcassette or a cell phone. So if you had a
> recording off 
> > the radio or some other waveform source, and there
> were a 
> > database with this engine and a lot of waveform
> data to 
> > attempt to match it up to, you could theoretically
> get 
> > anything ID'd, limited only by how comprehensive
> the database is.
> > 
> > That's a Goliath-size order of a 'ware, but who
> knows. Just 
> > daydreaming here... ;)
> > 
> > On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Afternoon (well it is here) all.  I've been
> quiet as I'm 
> > moving PCs at 
> > > the mo.  Got mail on one and everything else on
> another and 
> > unable to finish off (long story).
> > > Anyway want I want to know is does anyone know
> of a site on the 
> > > Discogs tip but where you can search by the
> names of tracks - even 
> > > those that weren't a release in their own right
> but are just album 
> > > tracks?  A lot to ask I know and maybe the huge
> amount of 
> > data concerned (imagine searching on a title like
> "I Love 
> > You"!) means it hasn't come along yet (though I
> guess it 
> > will, maybe Discogs II is just around the corner).
>  Be bl00dy 
> > useful though.
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to